PUBLICATION: The Daily Telegraph
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 11
BYLINE: William Heath
DATELINE: Surrey, United Kingdom
The Daily Telegraph prints a legal column, including a question from a new Surrey, U.K. homeowner wants to know if the people who sold the house -- who didn't tell him about a traffic noise problem -- can be sued. Although the columnist says decreased property value can't be claimed, damages can be sought if the homeowner would not have otherwise bought the home.
The legal column includes a question from a new Surrey, U.K. homeowner wants to know if the people who sold the house -- who didn't tell him about a traffic noise problem -- can be sued. The homeowner notes that the seller had received at least two compensation payments due to road noise.
The columnist says that the homeowner can not sue due to a decreased value of the home, since the road has been in operation for awhile and since the compensation payments were supposed to reflect any loss. If the new homeowner can prove the home would not have been bought if the noise problem had been properly disclosed, damages can be sought on those grounds.
PUBLICATION: Central Maine Morning Sentinel
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Betty Jespersen
DATELINE: Farmington, Maine
The Central Maine Morning Sentinel reports that a Farmington, Maine resident believes that logging equipment may have been used to steal a very large sign -- protesting the expansion of a neighboring log yard -- from the lawn. Officials say they didn't know who could have done it. They say that "the 6 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. operating hours would be enforced, wood slashing would be delayed until 6:30 a.m., and quieter equipment would be installed" if the expansion were approved.
The article reports that a Farmington, Maine resident believes that logging equipment may have been used to steal a very large sign -- protesting the expansion of a neighboring log yard -- from the lawn. The original location of the sign, which was mounted on six-inch cedar posts planted deep into the ground which were also taken, had no tire tracks near it, suggesting that a grappling hook -- which could have been used from the road -- may have been used to lift the very heavy sign out of the ground.
The article goes on to say that officials at the log yard -- who want to double its size and "include unloading, sorting, loading and unloading logs from tractor trailers." They say they didn't know who could have done it, since local logging contractors have little to lose even if the expansion does not go through, though they hadn't asked any of the logging contractors. They also say that "the 6 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. operating hours would be enforced, wood slashing would be delayed until 6:30 a.m., and quieter equipment would be installed." Truck traffic, which now consists of about 12 trucks, would double.
PUBLICATION: Evening Herald
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Supplement: Your Weekend, Pg.37
BYLINE: Vicky Maud
DATELINE: Plymouth, United Kingdom
The Evening Herald prints a question about neighbors who create noise. The columnists suggests that the resident keep a month-long diary of the noisy incidents. Then, send the diary to the local council asking what can be done. Also, the Environmental Health Department may be able to investigate the noise.
The columnist notes the possibility that the writer's house is not adequately insulated and may irritate the neighbors as well. She also says that settling things between neighbors is always preferable. She also notes a booklet, called "Bothered By Noise - What you can do about it", that she offers to other readers with similar problems.
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Triad/State, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Charles Frago
DATELINE: Archdale, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that a resident who fought against the expansion of an adhesive company in an industrial zone near his home several weeks ago also wanted to rezone another of his properties for business. The resident said an industrial zone will usually lower property values, while a property values near a business zone will usually rise. A 400-foot buffer was built to ease noise and pollution from the adhesive company's proposed expansion due to the resident's campaigning, only a few small portions of his property were approved for commercial zoning.
The article reports that a resident who fought against the expansion of an adhesive company in an industrial zone near his home several weeks ago also wanted to rezone another of his properties for business. Seniors living near the second property call him a hypocrite -- saying his rezoning will cause "the same concerns about noise, pollution and lower property values" that he fought against near his home -- but he says that the two situations are completely different.
The article notes that the resident said an industrial zone will usually lower property values, while a property values near a business zone will usually rise. He also pointed out that the seniors in the area would also likely benefit because the business zone would cause the city to run its water and sewer out to their area. The proposed business zone is located near two major highways and would likely be zones commercial soon anyway.
The article goes on to say that while a 400-foot buffer was built to ease noise and pollution from the adhesive company's proposed expansion due to the resident's campaigning, only a few small portions of his property were approved for commercial zoning.
PUBLICATION: The Orlando Sentinel
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Osceola Sentinel; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Pamela Mercer
DATELINE: Kissimmee, Florida
The Orlando Sentinel reports that although the County Commissioners for Kissimmee, Florida approved a 460-megawatt power plant in theory, they denied a requested noise exemption that would have allowed 85 decibels at the plant's perimeter. Neighbors signed a petition about their concerns over water, noise, and pollution problems from the plant. Plant officials are trying to find alternatives to lower the noise at the plant.
The article reports that although the County Commissioners for Kissimmee, Florida approved a 460-megawatt power plant in theory, they denied a requested noise exemption that would have allowed 85 decibels at the plant's perimeter. Commissioners said that the plant must stick to the current limits of 45-50 decibels, depending on the time of day.
The article notes that thirty neighbors signed a petition about their concerns over water, noise, and pollution problems from the plant. Plant officials are trying to find alternatives to lower the noise at the plant; they are pursuing the project since they have already signed a contract to provide electricity to a regional energy distributor.
PUBLICATION: The Patriot Ledger
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 20C
BYLINE: Ray Mceachern
DATELINE: Quincy, Massachusetts
The Patriot Ledger reports that the chairman of the license board -- Mr. Shea -- in Quincy, Massachusetts is voluntarily mediating a long-time dispute between a noisy magazine distribution operation and its neighbors. Mr. Shea has suggested several noise-reduction measures.
The article reports that the chairman of the license board -- Mr. Shea -- in Quincy, Massachusetts is voluntarily mediating a long-time dispute between a noisy magazine distribution operation and its neighbors. The distributor is allowed to operate all night, but is legally required to avoid loud noises at night. Although the police have never ticketed the company, it could be subject to $300 per noisy night.
The article notes that Mr. Shea has suggested several measures such as "utilizing a beeper system (similar to that used by some restaurants) to call drivers [from parking in a less noise-sensitive part of the city] when a delivery bay is open" as opposed to the current system that has trucks noisily idling while they wait. Also, wooden pallets would be handled more quietly and a barrier of poplar trees would reduce noise from the plant property.
PUBLICATION: The Scotsman
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 5
BYLINE: Kay Smith
DATELINE: Scotland
The Scotsman prints an article relating to the health risks of noise exposure. While it talks about stress, high blood pressure, and other problems noted in many articles, it does talk about a few local statistics and specific disorders worth mentioning here.
The paper prints an article relating to the health risks of noise exposure. While it talks about stress, high blood pressure, and other problems noted in many articles, it does talk about a few local statistics and specific disorders worth mentioning here. Noise over 55 decibels have been shown to disrupt sleep and cause aggression if consistent and unwanted. 450 million (65 percent) of Europe's population are regularly exposed to levels that high; ten million of those get around 75 decibels of noise, which generates high stress.
The article notes that "hyperacusis - a condition which most commonly occurs in childhood and which is characterized by a particular sensitivity to sound" is present in about six percent of the population. Also, people with migraines can have headaches spurred by noise. Children's learning and achievement can be affected by exposure to noise.
The article goes on to say that the 100 decibels regularly found in night clubs can cause damage after just fifteen minutes, and the number of young people who subject themselves to such loud music has almost tripled. to 18.8 percent from 1980's levels. Tinnitus -- ringing in the ear -- can occur at as little as 80 decibels; this is experienced by 80 percent of those who frequent nightclubs. Earplugs can help club-goers, and breaks of 10 minutes every hour can as well; breaks of at least sixteen hours after two hours of noise are important for your ear to rest.
The article notes that 1.3 million people receive damaging sound levels at work in industrial plants and even call centers which reach 90 decibels. In Scotland, employers must take action to reduce noise exposure for employees when noise reaches 85 decibels.
PUBLICATION: The Tampa Tribune
DATE: November 20, 1999
SECTION: South Tampa, Pg. 1
BYLINE: Cindy Rupert
DATELINE: Ybor City, Florida
The Tampa Tribune reports that against protests from local restaurant owners, Ybor City, Florida has passed an ordinance to forbid excessive noise in several districts.
The article reports that Ybor City, Florida has passed an ordinance to forbid excessive noise in several districts. Restaurant owners who feature outdoor entertainment applied for variances, but were denied. They maintain that their businesses will be "unworkable" and will have to close.
PUBLICATION: The Denver Post
DATE: November 19, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A-36
BYLINE: Dustin Bleizeffer
DATELINE: Gillette, Wyoming
The Denver Post reports that new regulations by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) are being called unfair by mine officials in the Gillette, Wyoming area. The regulations call for a three-tiered "engineering, administration, and hearing protection" strategy, which officials say they are already following. They do say that they will be working on quieter mufflers and exhaust systems.
The article reports that new regulations by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) are being called unfair by mine officials. Currently, the MSHA feels that hearing protection is being relied on too heavily while noise-reduction at the source is ignored. The regulations call for a three-tiered "engineering, administration, and hearing protection" strategy. Engineering refers to the quieting of equipment, while administration refers to the minimization of time that workers must be exposed to harmful noise.
The article notes that mine officials in the Gillette, Wyoming area say they've been following that strategy already, and say that the new regulations will force them to spend money that may not help very much. They do say that they will be working on quieter mufflers and exhaust systems. The new rules also require regular hearing tests, but many mines already perform these tests.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 19, 1999
SECTION: Pg.17
DATELINE: East Devon, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that a new law passed in the United Kingdom bans noisy concrete highways, but the law doesn't apply to the controversial A30 because of a traffic minimum. Residents say that the law should have taken into account bothersome noise that isn't arbitrarily defined by traffic volume.
The article reports that a new law passed in the United Kingdom bans noisy concrete highways, but the law doesn't apply to the controversial A30 because of a traffic minimum. The A30 isn't projected to serve 75,000 cars a day by 2011, but the law only bans concrete for roads that will.
The article notes that quieter surfaces halve the noise. Residents say that the law should have taken into account bothersome noise that isn't arbitrarily defined by traffic volume. "It is clearly not just the number of vehicles along the road which creates this terrible noise." Continental European countries like Holland are further ahead than the U.K. when it comes to quieter highways.
PUBLICATION: Herald Express
DATE: November 19, 1999
SECTION: News;Ents;Music, Pg.5
DATELINE: Torquay, United Kingdom
The Herald Express reports that a pub in Torquay, U.K. was denied the renewal of its entertainment license because it has not lowered its noise output since it was first warned in March. Pub operators said they had done all that needed to be done, but noise officials disagreed.
The article reports that a pub in Torquay, U.K. was denied the renewal of its entertainment license because it has not lowered its noise output since it was first warned in March. The pub operators wrote the council last month -- after several warnings -- saying that bathroom windows and outside doors had been soundproofed, and that speakers had been quieted; noise inspectors found the noise problems were still present. Residents' complaints first prompted the noise warning.
PUBLICATION: The Morning Call
DATE: November 19, 1999
SECTION: Local/Region, Pg. B6
BYLINE: Jeff Gelman
DATELINE: Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania
The Morning Call reports that town supervisors in Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania have refused to move forward on an ordinance proposed to stop night-construction at a new Wal-Mart. A skeptical supervisor said he had gone to the site and said "I didn't really mind the noise that I heard."
The article reports that town supervisors in Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania have refused to move forward on an ordinance proposed by one of its members. Residents living near the construction site for a new Wal-Mart complained that night-construction as late as midnight was keeping them up, but construction crews said they couldn't stop because they were under a deadline.
The article notes that one supervisor said emergency utility crews would be hampered by the ordinance, and when asked why they couldn't just receive a special permit he said that permits couldn't be granted for an instantaneous emergency such as a storm. That skeptical supervisor said he had gone to the site and said "I didn't really mind the noise that I heard."
PUBLICATION: Business Wire
DATE: November 18, 1999
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
Business Wire reports that at a hearing, attended by at least 200 residents, the noise consultant for the Seattle-Tacoma Airport has proposed the use of split flight paths for north and south departures that would share noise more evenly between communities. CANE (full-name unspecified) was concerned that the proposal had fizzled out in 1990 when it was first proposed, but were optimistic that it would now be taken seriously by the Port Authority. The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) seemed interested in examining the consultant's proposal more closely.
The article reports that at a hearing, attended by at least 200 residents, the noise consultant for the Seattle-Tacoma Airport has proposed the use of split flight paths for north and south departures that would share noise more evenly between communities. CANE, part of the non-profit Seattle Council on Airport Affairs and a prominent voice at the hearing, is primarily concerned with the Part 150 study that "evaluate[s] present and proposed programs to reduce the impact of airport noise according to FAA guidelines."
The article notes that CANE was concerned that the proposal had fizzled out in 1990 when it was first proposed, but were optimistic that it would now be taken seriously by the Port Authority. Also, they said that CANE had been pushing for the use of an industrial flight corridor since June.
The article goes on to say that the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) seemed interested in examining the consultant's proposal more closely.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 18, 1999
SECTION: Pg.1
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that after official noise tests by the Highways Agency, Exeter, U.K.'s A30 has been proven to be 1.5 decibels higher than officials had predicted the noise would be fifteen years from now. The tests were forced by 2,000 residents of East Devon who say the road has been unbearably loud since its opening in August. Activists plan to begin working more closely with the agency in deciding what can be done now.
The article reports that after official noise tests by the Highways Agency, Exeter, U.K.'s A30 has been proven to be 1.5 decibels higher than officials had predicted the noise would be fifteen years from now. The tests were done as measured from 300 meters away. Based on the new data, predictions will be recalculated based on "the actual road surface used and its texture depth, the updated traffic forecasts and the landscaping as constructed."
The article goes on to say that the tests were forced by 2,000 residents of East Devon who say the road has been unbearably loud since its opening in August. "Resurface the A30" activists want it resurfaced in asphalt. The head of the highways agency has said that activists should begin working more closely with the agency in deciding what should be done now.
PUBLICATION: The Gloucester Citizen
DATE: November 18, 1999
SECTION: News: 999, Pg.2
DATELINE: Gloucester, United Kingdom
The Gloucester Citizen reports that the owner of a Gloucester pub which received numerous noise complaints recently has said he will cooperate with environmental health officers who want to test the venue.
The article reports that the owner of a Gloucester pub which received numerous noise complaints recently has said he will cooperate with environmental health officers who want to test the venue. Residents were kept awake until just before midnight, but the pub owner said he has already reduced the noise somewhat; he is open to suggestions from the officers upon examination of the premises.
PUBLICATION: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
DATE: November 18, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. B7
BYLINE: Kevin Chapman
DATELINE: St. Louis, Missouri
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch prints an editorial which claims that Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) projects always result in destruction of communities. The writer asserts that MoDOT answers to no-one but a poorly defined independent council, and is not concerned with the noisy, environmentally-insensitive aftermath it leaves in a community because it doesn't have to be. The writer urges residents to sit down with their representatives to demand more accountability.
The article prints an editorial which claims that Missouri Department of Transportation projects always result in destruction of communities. The writer warns residents near the planned expansion of Highway 40 that in his neighborhood, "landscaping" efforts left bare rock rubble where mature trees used to be. Construction noise and light will be generated throughout the night, and increased traffic noise will be left in its wake. Soundwalls will be few, since guidelines for justifying walls are strict. Property values will fall.
The editorial writer notes that MoDOT answers to no-one but a poorly defined independent council, and is not concerned with the aftermath it leaves in a community because it doesn't have to be. The writer urges residents to sit down with their representatives to demand more accountability.
PUBLICATION: The Straits Times
DATE: November 18, 1999
SECTION: Home; Pg. 60
DATELINE: Singapore
The Straits Times reports that the consolidation of 17 trade unions in the engineering and finance industries in Singapore has resulted in two, stronger union groups. Proponents of the consolidation point to reductions in occupational noise hazards through the strength of the new groups.
The article reports that the consolidation of 17 trade unions in the engineering and finance industries in Singapore has resulted in two, stronger union groups. The original unions retain their identify, but gain bargaining power in the form of the larger group. Proponents of the consolidation point to reductions in occupational noise hazards through the strength of the new groups.
The article notes that noise-induced deafness is the largest occupational health risk in Singapore, especially for those in "manufacturing, transport equipment and metal fabrication companies using high-speed equipment to grind, saw and drill." At least 65,000 workers are effected. The program "helps firms identify hazardous work areas, monitor and cut excessive noise. Workers will be taught to wear proper ear protection and react quickly to early signs of impaired hearing."
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: November 18, 1999
SECTION: Virginia Beach Beacon, Pg. 13
BYLINE: Denise Montini
DATELINE: Virginia Beach, Virginia
The Virginian-Pilot prints several letters to the editor, one of which asserts that jet noise around Virginia Beach's Oceana Naval Base is simply the price we pay for freedom.
"Jet noise is the price we pay for our freedom
I grew up across the street from Oceana Naval Air Station and have lived in Virginia Beach for over 20 years now. I am appalled at how spoiled and ungrateful some citizens of this community can be. I feel compelled to issue a few "news flashes" to my complaining neighbors.
Oceana is the largest naval base in the entire country. It is foolish to think you can live less than 20 miles, or even in the same city, and not hear jet noise.
This base was here long before most of us lived here; it is not likely they built the base around your house. It is the other way around.
We don't fight wars from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Last time I checked, we bombed the Middle East in the dead of night. It is unjust and insane to send our pilots into a nighttime war zone without ever training them at night!
I don't care if every pilot on the base has to train at 3 a.m. every night. If that is what it takes to make sure they are competent and efficient and subsequently stay alive in combat, then fly, baby fly! Fly over my house all night if you need to! I would much rather hear the roar of Navy planes over my home than those of a foreign country!
Freedom isn't free. There is a price to pay for it. Men and women have died to secure our freedom. For Americans to complain about jet noise is unthinkable. So, you say you don't like the jet noise? I'll help you pack your bags."
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Oklahoma City
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that Oklahoma City Council is considering support of a buyout of a community near Tinker Air Force Base now that research has linked volatile organic compounds from years of aircraft refurbishing to average birth weights two-ounces lower than normal. At least one representative believes a buyout should occur on the basis of noise alone.
The article reports that Oklahoma City Council is considering support of a buyout of the Kimsey Addition. Research has linked volatile organic compounds from years of aircraft refurbishing at the nearby Tinker Air Force Base to average birth weights two-ounces lower than normal.
The article notes that water pollution could cause the low birth weights, and air pollution could complicate the survival of already underweight babies. At least one representative believes a buyout should occur on the basis of noise alone; noise can also be harmful to unborn babies. It was not clear from the article, but it appeared that any buyout may be federally funded.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 10
BYLINE: Chris Clair
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that a Chicago tax lawyer has proposed a property tax exemption for residents who deal with 65 decibels of noise from airports. Residents support the idea, which would be equal to the current general homestead exemption: about $300-$500.
The article reports that at a recent meeting of an anti-noise group near Chicago's O'Hare Airport, a Chicago tax lawyer named Pat Quinn proposed a property tax exemption for residents who deal with 65 decibels of noise from airports. No one from the state legislature has come forward to sponsor the bill, and local officials don't seem confident that the idea will make it.
The article notes that Quinn is a former state treasurer, and initiated several recent governmental changes such as the shrinking of the state House and the creation of the Citizens Utility Board. Residents at the meeting supported the idea, which would be equal to the current general homestead exemption: about $300-$500.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Neighbor; The Local Beat; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Shamus Toomey
DATELINE: Palwaukee, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that at a recent meeting on an airport noise study, a Palwaukee resident suggested instituting a noise hot line for Palwaukee Municipal Airport. Officials noted that the current answering machine does take noise complaints, but it has been seldom used and ineffective since complainers rarely leave their names. Also, an alderman made it clear that noise-abatement funds should not be counted on as a definite result of the study.
The article reports that at a recent meeting on airport noise, a Palwaukee resident suggested instituting a noise hot line for Palwaukee Municipal Airport. The hot line could be used to keep track of pilots who regularly flew over particularly noise sensitive areas for unclear reasons. Officials noted that the current answering machine does take noise complaints, but it has been seldom used and ineffective since complainers rarely leave their names.
The article notes that at the same meeting -- which centered around a two-year study of noise abatement at the airport -- an alderman made it clear that noise-abatement funds should not be counted on. The study may result in $400,000 in funding, but since the study will be impartially evaluated it can't be counted on.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. To3
BYLINE: Paul O'donoghue
DATELINE: Moorpark, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that a Moorpark, California botanical nursery operation will now be able to use a city-owned dirt road between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays, and will also pay $300 each month for use of the road. The owner of the business accepts that most of the stipulations are very fair, but had hoped for more extended hours.
The article reports that a Moorpark, California botanical nursery operation will now be able to use a city-owned dirt road -- one it has been using for a long time for free -- between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays. The operation will also pay $300 each month for use of the road.
The article notes that the restriction came after residents complained about the noise. Many residents nearby say the business is a good neighbor, and the owner of the business accepts that most of the stipulations are very fair. He had hoped for more extended hours, but says that his business is not in danger because of the new restrictions.
PUBLICATION: The Denver Post
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Denver & The West; Pg. B-10
DATELINE: Arapahoe County, Colorado
The Denver Post prints an editorial that praises Arapahoe County, Colorado Commissioners for placing a moratorium on development near airports until a two-year, $400,000 noise study is completed.
The article prints an editorial that praises Arapahoe County, Colorado Commissioners for placing a moratorium on development near airports until a two-year, $400,000 noise study is completed. The study, which is soon to be finished, will help commissioners decide whether stricter development rules are needed around the airport.
The article notes that restrictions are being considered for development in areas with more than an average of 65 decibels of noise during each day and night; the commission may be more strict and restrict development in 60 decibel zones. The restrictions will serve to reduce lawsuits and to protect residents from excess noise. Currently, 8,000 noise complaints are made each year.
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Environment: Noise, Pg.05
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that a group of residents who have been campaigning to have the noisy M1 highway near Long Eaton, U.K. resurfaced for fifteen years are planning to go to London to be heard.
The article reports that a group of residents who have been campaigning to have the M1 highway near Long Eaton, U.K. resurfaced for fifteen years are planning to go to London to be heard. The trip comes after a recent Highways Agency ruling that the M1 will not be resurfaced before regular maintenance requires it. The noise from the highway regularly disrupts the lives of those who live along it, and campaigners expect to tell the transport ministers just that.
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Environment: Noise, Pg.07
DATELINE: Burton, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that a Burton, U.K. man was fined 2,596 pounds for loud music and voices that came from his home.
The article reports that a Burton, U.K. man was fined 2,596 pounds for loud music and voices that came from his home in January of this year. He was charged under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Pg.11
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that a window company in Exeter, U.K. will build a sound-wall around a loud trash compactor that has drawn numerous complaints from residents. The company agreed to use the compactor only between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. during the week and 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays.
The article reports that a window company in Exeter, U.K. will build a sound-wall around a loud trash compactor that has drawn numerous complaints form residents. The company makes about 250 windows each week. The council had agreed to serve the company with a notice about the noise, but took almost three months to do so; some questioned if the council was playing favorites with the company.
The article notes that the company agreed to use the compactor only between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. during the week and 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays. Despite complaints, the company did not exceed local noise limits.
PUBLICATION: The Orange County Register
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional News
BYLINE: Peter Larsen and Jim Radcliffe
DATELINE: Orange County, California
The Orange County Register reports that after FAA e-mails were released in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, it is clear that the FAA has serious concerns about safety and efficiency of any airport that was approved at Orange County's El Toro site. A largely ignored alternative plan, called the V-plan, was praised in the e-mails; the plan would use north and south runways to send planes over the least populated areas.
The article reports that after FAA e-mails were released in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, it is clear that the FAA has serious concerns about any airport that was approved at Orange County's El Toro site. Officials noted that the establishment of an airport was a local decision, while safety was the FAA's main concern. Despite this fact, FAA officials said that El Toro, which would be within seven nautical miles of the existing John Wayne airport, would be inefficient and air space issues would be complicated.
The article goes on to say that a largely ignored alternative plan, called the V-plan, was praised in the e-mails. The plan would have banned 747s and used the north and south runways to send planes over the least populated areas, minimizing noise problems.
PUBLICATION: The Patriot Ledger
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 20S
BYLINE: L.j. Griffin
DATELINE: Hanson, Massachusetts
The Patriot Ledger reports that Hanson, Massachusetts residents have complained that a commuter rail engine stops its loudly idling engine near their homes and disturbing their sleep.
The article reports that Hanson, Massachusetts residents have complained that a commuter rail engine makes regular rest-stop breaks at night, stopping the loudly idling engine near their homes and disturbing their sleep. They say that if the train was stopped just one train length ahead, woods would provide a noise buffer, protecting their health and hearing. A local selectman noted that the track being used was for passing, not resting. The board will contact the state and discuss solutions at a later meeting.
PUBLICATION: PR Newswire
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Financial News
DATELINE: Toledo, Ohio
PR Newswire reports that two building companies -- Owens Corning and Trus Joist MacMillan -- have formed an alliance to produce new technologies for noise-reduction in the home. The first product is an easily installed solution to the traditional multi-step process used to keep vibration form passing easily from one side of a wall to the other.
The article reports that two building companies -- Owens Corning and Trus Joist MacMillan -- have formed an alliance to produce new technologies for noise-reduction in the home. The first jointly developed product is called QuietZone Acoustic Wall Framing, and replaces a commonly-used multi-step technique used "to break the direct vibrational path through the stud system from one side of the wall to the other" with the one-step installation of"two pieces of engineered lumber... that are isolated from one another by acoustically resilient metal clips."
PUBLICATION: Riverfront Times
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: News Shorts
BYLINE: D.j. Wilson
DATELINE: St. Louis, Missouri
The Riverfront Times reports that a physics professor at the University of Missouri -- St. Louis is saying that a planned campus performing arts center will be plagued with noise from jets flying overhead. The professor says the site should be moved to south campus and should be built with a thicker roof and walls that would block 10 additional decibels of outside noise.
The article reports that a physics professor at the University of Missouri -- St. Louis is saying that a planned campus performing arts center will be plagued with noise from jets flying overhead. Noise from the hundreds of jets that fly over the site daily will produce approximately 65 decibels in the lobby and 45 decibels in the hall, as judged by a noise test at a similar facility in Florida.
The article notes that the professor's 19 page report, sent to the head of the university, has been ignored. He believes the noise problem should be made public since tax dollars will be used to build the center. The professor says the site should be moved to south campus and should be built with a thicker roof and walls that would block 10 additional decibels of outside noise.
PUBLICATION: The Santa Fe New Mexica
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B-1
BYLINE: Sharyn Obsatz
DATELINE: Santa Fe, New Mexico
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Les Blomberg, NPC
The Santa Fe New Mexica reports that Santa Fe, New Mexico is close to passing a proposed ordinance which would fine operators of loud stereos as much as $500 if they can be heard from 25 feet away. Car-stereo clubs say that their members will be restricted more than necessary, and even city officials from Albuquerque says that 25 feet will mean that even reasonable music volumes will be subject to fines.
The article reports that Santa Fe, New Mexico is close to passing a proposed ordinance which would fine operators of loud stereos as much as $500 if they can be heard from 25 feet away. Even first time offenders will be asked to pay $200. The ordinance is in response to residents' complaints, and to discourage drivers from playing their music so loud that they couldn't hear an emergency vehicle.
The article notes that several car-stereo clubs in the area, sponsored by local stereo shops, say that their members will be restricted more than necessary. They say that loud music can be played while on large highways so no one will be bothered.
The article goes on to say that Albuquerque sets the audible distance at 50 feet,and the city's attorney notes that 25 feet will mean that even reasonable music volumes will be subject to fines. Santa Fe officials say the distance is appropriate because of their narrower streets and densely-packed houses.
PUBLICATION: The Sentinel
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Business: Restaurants & Take Aways, Pg.5
DATELINE: Werrington, United Kingdom
The Sentinel reports that a license to host musical events until 11:30 p.m. Thursday through Sunday was granted to a bar in Werrington, U.K. despite residents' concerns about potential noise.
The article reports that a license to host musical events until 11:30 p.m. Thursday through Sunday was granted to a bar in Werrington, U.K. despite residents' concerns about potential noise. Residents say that already, loud patrons leaving the establishment disturb their sleep. The owners said that they keep the noise under local limits, and will be installing double-glazed windows to help even more.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Citrus TIMES; Guest Column; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Mary Ann Williams; A.D. Williams
DATELINE: Ozello, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times prints a letter to the editor on the problem of airboat noise in Ozello, Florida.
"Airboating in Citrus County is becoming more and more popular. Here in Ozello, where we only occasionally heard an airboat passing by, their numbers have increased to the point of becoming a serious nuisance. In addition to the local residents who own airboats, others are trailering boats here from elsewhere. Some may have found the lakes and rivers they previously frequented too crowded and dangerous, whereas the coastal waters offer a lot more room to play.
Before continuing, let me say some airboaters have relatively quiet motors and are safe and courteous boaters that we welcome on the water near our homes. Most, however, are guilty of one or more of the following:
Inadequately muffled engines.
Revving their engines up and down, over and over again.
Driving too fast along shorelines, between islands that are close together and up narrow creeks, all without regard for the safety of other individuals who may be nearby in small boats, canoes or kayaks.
Cutting corners too close and sliding sideways partly out of control.
Driving through and over environmentally sensitive marshes, mangroves and swampy areas.
Driving around at all hours of the day and night, disturbing residents when near homes, disturbing other boaters on the water and disturbing wildlife when near islands, marshes and wooded areas.
Driving at night without using navigation lights.
Driving at night past the 11 p.m. curfew for airboats.
Drinking and driving, sometimes hanging out at the local bars before going out on the water.
Laws must be enacted that limit the amount of noise any boat can make. Loud noises are very annoying, frustrating and disruptive. Some airboaters can be heard while they are still 2 or 3 miles away. It is not unusual for an airboat a quarter-mile away to be so noisy that one cannot even hear conversation or a television that is only a few feet away. If you can imagine the noise a large diesel transport truck would make driving through your living room, that is what it is sometimes like when a noisy airboat is near. It is not unusual to be awakened from a sound sleep at midnight, 3 a.m. or any time during the late night or early morning hours and be kept awake while some irresponsible, inconsiderate individual drives his airboat back and forth near your house or up a nearby creek.
Humans are not the only ones affected by excess noise. Florida has spent millions of tax dollars to purchase thousands of acres of coastal lands and marshes along our west coast. In the St. Martin's Marsh Aquatic Preserve, the state's purpose is to protect and preserve environmentally sensitive areas from development and destruction, and to protect wildlife, aquatic life and ecosystems from harm. There currently is a plan being developed that will bring endangered whooping cranes to Citrus County's coastal region. These cranes and other species of birds and animals are easily frightened by loud noises and disruptive human behavior. In the absence of sensible regulations and enforcement of those regulations, all plans, all good intentions and all the money being spent on these projects ultimately will have been in vain.
Now is the time for Citrus County and Florida to address the issues of excessive noise and careless and unsafe boating. There is no legitimate reason or excuse to permit a few individuals to disturb other people or wildlife with noisy engines, and there is no reason or excuse to permit careless, unsafe boating, which is resulting each year in more and more injuries and deaths.
Please address these issues without delay, enact laws that protect and benefit us all, and provide the necessary enforcement."
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: November 17, 1999
SECTION: Metro Northwest; Pg. 7A; Zone: Nw
BYLINE: Kathleen Quirsfeld
DATELINE: West Dundee, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that in response to residents' complaints about noise from leaf blowers and vacuum trucks at a nearby business, West Dundee, Illinois has passed a noise ordinance. Fines will range from $25 to $500.
The article reports that in response to residents' complaints about noise from leaf blowers and vacuum trucks at a nearby business, West Dundee, Illinois has passed a noise ordinance. Fines will range from $25 to $500.
The article notes that noise from musical and electronic equipment can not be heard from further than 50 feet away between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. Construction and commercial maintenance can not be done except "between 7 a.m. and 8:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 8:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. Sunday." Snow removal and street sweeping projects are exempted.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
BYLINE: Nina Rizzo
DATELINE: Washington Township, N.J.
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that members of the Washington, New Jersey Community Against Traffic Sound have convinced the Turnpike Authority to conduct several studies that may lead to noise walls for schools and hospitals near the turnpike.
The article reports that members of the Washington, New Jersey Community Against Traffic Sound have convinced the Turnpike Authority to conduct several studies that may lead to noise walls for schools and hospitals near the turnpike. The group's members have lobbied for noise walls for residences in recent years, although those walls were denied since developers "knew the turnpike was there when they built."
The article notes that noise affects children's education. 19 miles of noise wall at $2.5-million per mile have been built in the last fifteen years. The studies will "identify schools and hospitals nearest to the turnpike's right of way that might be affected by noise, measure noise levels and survey other states' criteria for building sound barriers."
The article goes on to say that the turnpike has become louder in the last five years as truckers have been forced off of local roads and encouraged to use the turnpike.
PUBLICATION: Cox News Service
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Domestic, Non-Washington, General News Item
BYLINE: Jason Spencer
DATELINE: Austin, Texas
The Cox News Service reports that the actor Matthew McConaughey was fined $50 for a night of naked bongo drumming for violating the Austin, Texas noise ordinance.
The article reports that the actor Matthew McConaughey was fined $50 for a night of naked bongo drumming for violating the Austin, Texas noise ordinance. Police dismissed a $4,000 fine for resisting arrest when he pleaded guilty to the noise violation, and after neighbors attested that "he was angry and back-talking the officers but was not physically resisting them."
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Transport: Airports - East Midlands Airport, Pg.19
DATELINE: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that a Member of Parliament (MP) from North West Leicestershire will be speaking on the need to give local councils the power to regulate aircraft noise; currently only the secretary of state has this power.
The article reports that a Member of Parliament (MP) from North West Leicestershire will be speaking on the need to give local councils the power to regulate aircraft noise. Currently only the secretary of state has this power, but the MP called that a loophole that he will attempt to close. "He said "I don't think there has been a conscious decision to free airports from this kind of control, more that it's a case that sometimes legislation is slow to respond to social change."
The article goes on to say that the secretary of state has already imposed restrictions on London airports night operations.
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Entertainment: Festivals - Millennium Celebrations, Pg.09
BYLINE: Claire Graham
DATELINE: Derby, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that in Derby, U.K. at least 23 clubs have asked to stay open later than usual on New Year's Eve. One hotel, located in a residential area, has drawn criticism from residents who say noise is bad enough already.
The article reports that in Derby, U.K. at least 23 clubs have asked to stay open later than usual on New Year's Eve. One hotel, located in a residential area, has drawn criticism from over 20 residents in the area who say noise is bad enough already, without extra operating hours. The hotel is applying to stay open until 6 a.m.
The article goes on to say that the city council may attach noise limiters on many sound systems, assuring that noise will stay below a certain level or the power will be cut.
PUBLICATION: The Des Moines Register
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Main News Pg.1
BYLINE: Kyle Munson
DATELINE: Urbandale, Iowa
The Des Moines Register reports that at least three bars near residences in Urbandale, Iowa have lost their ability to legally host live entertainment after residents complained. Bars in "commercial neighborhood" zoning can't have live entertainment.
The article reports that at least three bars near residences in Urbandale, Iowa have lost their ability to legally host live entertainment after residents complained. City officials say they didn't know that live music was being offered, and say that bars in "commercial neighborhood" zoning can't have live entertainment.
The article notes that many residents were concerned about their young children losing sleep, and about the value of their homes. The clubs note that they have replaced some live music with karaoke, but say that it will be harder to compete now.
PUBLICATION: The Herald
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 4A
BYLINE: by Sarah O'donnell
DATELINE: York County, South Carolina
The Herald reports that York County, South Carolina's tourism councils want to merge, and spend up to $4,000 on a new noise study for the county airport.
The article reports that York County, South Carolina's tourism councils that promote hotel and restaurants, and sports, want to merge. They also want to spend up to $4,000 on a new noise study for the county airport. Most land around the airport is zoned residential, and the airport wants the county to rezone much of it.
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. A8, The Bottom Line
BYLINE: William J. Powers
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News and Record prints an editorial that says FedEx, who wants to build a new runway and hub at the local airport, have not answered some key questions in their public comments to date. Questions relate to property taxes, noise, and pollution.
The editorial says FedEx, who wants to build a new runway and hub at the local airport, have not answered some key questions in their public comments to date. Questions have to do with noise, funding, and pollution.
The article questioned how the new runway will affect the tax system, as far as who will pay property taxes lost when the new facility is built, and how much will property values be affected. Also, why does FedEx spend $200-million to name a football stadium, but require hundreds of millions in public funds for the proposed hub? It questioned how much pollution will get into air and water, how much money it will take to clean up after that pollution, and how much the water pollution that gets through the treatment plant will affect citizens' health.
The article goes on to ask "Why is the Greensboro noise cone smaller than the Indianapolis noise cone? Aren't these the same planes with the same loads flying on the same takeoff schedule over the same geography?" Also, what is being planned for noise mitigation?
PUBLICATION: The Post and Courier
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: B, Pg. 1
BYLINE: Robert Behre;
DATELINE: Charleston, South Carolina
The Post and Courier reports that residents of Charleston, South Carolina have a list of ways that the city could make existing tourism laws more effective. A broad, day-long forum on tourism laws is planned for next week. Major issues include stopping tours after 6 p.m., reducing noise, and regulating large busses.
The article reports that residents of Charleston, South Carolina have a list of ways that the city could make existing tourism laws more effective. The laws are designed to stop tours after 6 p.m., reduce noise, and regulate large busses.
The article notes that a recent special meeting on the subject of enforcement -- which ran ninety minutes and did not have a chance to address the original 16 concerns -- complements a broader, day-long forum on tourism laws. The city has "cross-trained" its parking officials to enforce tourism laws; residents say this has helped some, but not enough, since officers are off the street by 7 p.m. Some tour groups count on small fines as a cost of doing business, but the commission may begin revocation of licenses for repeat offenders.
The article notes that 3.3 million tourists add $2.57-billion to the economy each year in Charleston.
The article notes that the existing noise ordinance "needs work," because the decibel level is low enough that church bells and city trucks violate it.
PUBLICATION: The Salt Lake Tribune
DATE: November 16, 1999
SECTION: Final; Pg. B10
BYLINE: Brandon Loomis
DATELINE: Farmington, Utah
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that alternatives to soundwalls in Farmington, Utah are being explored by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The DOT is examining an alternative to a 17-foot soundwall -- a 10-foot earthen berm with three feet of stylized rock on top -- to satisfy those who want soundwalls but believe they are ugly. The soundwall debate has other sides too; some say soundwalls block views and reflect sound uphill, some say they're critical for quality of life, some demand them to keep up their property values, some say they work but they're too ugly and hurt property values.
The article reports that alternatives to soundwalls in Farmington, Utah are being explored by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The soundwall debate in Utah has many sides; some say soundwalls block views and reflect sound uphill, some say they're critical for quality of life, some demand them to keep up their property values, some say they work but they're too ugly and hurt property values.
The article notes that the DOT is examining an alternative to a 17-foot soundwall -- a 10-foot earthen berm with three feet of stylized rock on top -- to satisfy those who want soundwalls but believe they are ugly. The alternative walls will also cost less: $120 per foot instead of $170. Residents voted by more than 70% against traditional soundwalls, because officials told them that the alternative was possible if deemed as effective as traditional walls. A consultant is working to compare the two methods using computer models.
The article notes that Utah's DOT can never count on public opinion, since elsewhere in the state one region is thankful for finally getting soundwalls, while another is agitating to have them torn down. An environmental psychologist said that people get so upset about noise at their home because "It's the place we think we have the most control over."
PUBLICATION: The Tulsa World
DATE: November 16, 1999
DATELINE: Tulsa, Oklahoma
The Tulsa World reports that a federal funding bill, planned to give the FAA $50-billion in funds between 2001 and 2004 has been abandoned for this year, meaning that among other projects, a noise mitigation program at Tulsa Airport in Oklahoma will be jeopardized. The $20-million program will reduce noise levels at 1,000 homes surrounding the airport using either $15,000 sound insulation per home, monetary flyover easements, or assistance in making up noise-related losses from home sales.
The article reports that a federal funding bill, planned to give the FAA $50-billion in funds between 2001 and 2004 has been abandoned for this year, meaning that many airport projects around the country may be jeopardized. This article discusses the noise mitigation project planned to begin next year at Tulsa Airport in Oklahoma.
The article notes that the project would have applied for $2-million next year, then $8-million, $4-million, and $2-million respectively in the next three years. The $20-million program will receive 80% of its funding from the federal government. The program will attempt to reduce noise levels at 1,000 homes surrounding the airport in its 65-decibel-or-higher noise impact area. Choices will include $15,000 sound insulation per home, monetary flyover easements, or assistance in making up noise-related losses from home sales.
PUBLICATION: Australian General News
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: Australian General News; Australian General News
BYLINE: Janelle Miles
DATELINE: Brisbane, Australia
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Jackie Cann, president of Ban Aircraft over Residential Brisbane (BARB)
The Australian General News reports that a statement from Ban Aircraft over Residential Brisbane (BARB) was presented to a senate inquiry in Brisbane, Australia on problems associated with the proposed parallel runway at Brisbane Airport; potential problems include increased learning difficulties in schoolchildren and health problems.
The article reports that a statement from Ban Aircraft over Residential Brisbane (BARB) was presented to a senate inquiry in Brisbane, Australia on problems associated with the proposed parallel runway at Brisbane Airport. The statement warned of an increase in already present learning difficulties of local school children. Also mentioned were potential health problems.
The article notes that the runway's noise could also increase sleep deprivation, cardiovascular illness, hypertension, and psychiatric problems. Pollution could worsen respiratory diseases, since the "Combustion of fuel in aircraft engines results in a variety of gases, including nitric and nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide."
The article concludes by noting that residents would have to double glaze their windows and confine themselves inside to deal with noise.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 15
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times reports that homeowners near Chicago's Midway Airport launched a campaign to double the property tax relief given to residents state-wide who live near airports.
The article reports that homeowners near Chicago's Midway Airport launched a campaign to double the property tax relief given to residents state-wide who live in airports' 65-decibel-or-higher noise impact area. The measure would provide $350-500 each year in tax relief.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: Neighbor; Neighbor Fencepost; Pg. 1
The Chicago Daily Herald prints several letters to the editor, one of which relates to aircraft noise. The writer says that noise complaints from Roselle residents about Schaumburg, Illinois' Airport are those who are upset that the village missed its chance in the 1970s to benefit economically from the airport by buying it.
"Real issues about airport
Although I am living in South Carolina, I grew up in Schaumburg and learned to fly at the Schaumburg Airport. I have watched the recent articles in the Daily Herald about noise and safety concerns.
I was living in Schaumburg and flying out of the airport in 1975 when the issue of the village buying the airport came up. The same noise issues came up then and were dismissed for several reasons.
The main reason was the noise survey that was taken at the intersection of Roselle and Irving Park Roads. This intersection is significant because it is under the point in the air where single-engine planes turn to the final approach course to Runway 28 (now 29). The survey showed that the noise level of surface traffic at the intersection was higher than that generated by an aircraft on final approach to Schaumburg Airport. In fact, the only air traffic that was louder than the surface traffic was a Boeing 727 on final approach to Runway 9L at O'Hare.
There has always been a railroad track that runs through the middle of Roselle. It is my recent experience that trains make more noise and are more likely to have fatal accidents than General Aviation Airplanes. I currently live about 1 mile from a railroad crossing and hear train whistles and locomotive all night long.
The real issue about Schaumburg Airport is money. In the early '70s, the village of Roselle was given the opportunity to purchase the airport. In fact, it was once called Roselle Airport. The village declined. A portion of the airport lies in DuPage County.
However, since it is owned by a municipal government there are no property taxes levied on the airport. That is revenue that is lost to DuPage County and the village of Roselle.
Additionally, there is probably a significant amount of sales and fuel taxes generated at the airport that Roselle is not able to receive.
The residents and village officials of Roselle are not really upset about safety or noise it is the envy of economic growth that is driving the complaints.
R.G. Fitch II
North Charleston, SC
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: Triad/State, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Alex Wayne
DATELINE: High Point, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that High Point, North Carolina planners admit that their 1997 approval of a housing development located north of Piedmont Triad International Airport was a mistake. They knew the airport would expand but did not know that the noise corridor from a soon-to-be-proposed runway would pass directly over the development. The FAA is conducting an environmental study that should be done early next year which should more specifically explore potential noise problems at the development.
The article reports that High Point, North Carolina planners admit that their 1997 approval of a housing development -- Frazier Downs -- located north of Piedmont Triad International Airport should never have happened. At the time, they knew the airport would expand but did not know that the noise corridor from a soon-to-be-proposed runway would pass directly over the development.
The article notes that the original developer tried to sell the property to the airport once they learned of the runway plan, but the airport wouldn't take it. Another developer bought it and has created 57 lots with beautiful homes, and they continue to say that the pluses of the location -- which is "convenient to Greensboro, Kernersville and High Point and to the airport, highways and shopping districts, as well as being served by... the county's best schools." -- will make the noise worthwhile.
The article goes on to say that the new runway is part of a plan for a FedEx hub, planned for completion in 2004. The runway would send dozens of planes over the development each night. The FAA is conducting an environmental study that should be done early next year which should more specifically explore potential noise problems at the development.
The article notes that developers make home buyers sign a waiver that says they know about the airport's expansion plans, but they don't necessarily know that the corridor will pass directly over the development; the developer says it simply refers them to the airport commission, which is the official 'information' provider. Currently, planes fly at least a mile east of the development, and only fly over the development when unusual weather conditions demand it.
The article goes on to say that the current land use plan, drafted in 1997, still does not note the planned runway; revisions are being made but are still unapproved. Two of nine planning board members voted against the development originally, but cited that at the time their main reason was that the development -- located ten miles from the center of town -- contributed to urban sprawl. They did say that knowing of the airport's general expansion plans, planners still could have realized that development that far north was not a wise idea.
PUBLICATION: Newsday
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: News; Page A19
BYLINE: Annia Ciezadlo
DATELINE: Jamaica, New York City
Newsday reports that a reverend in Jamaica, New York City has asked an old friend -- now influential in the U.S. Congress -- to help reduce aircraft noise from Kennedy Airport by supporting a bill passed by the House and pending in the Senate. The bill would force the heretofore exempt Concorde supersonic jet to comply with noise regulations, and would also strengthen those regulations for all aircraft.
The article reports that a reverend in Jamaica, New York City has asked an old friend -- now influential in the U.S. Congress -- to help reduce aircraft noise from Kennedy Airport. A bill was passed by the House in August that would force the heretofore exempt Concorde supersonic jet to comply with noise regulations, as well as usher in stricter noise reduction rules.
The article notes that the reverend's friend Rodney Slater and Chuck Schumer (NY senator) are important to the passage of the bill through the Senate, and in pressuring the FAA and the airlines.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: November 15, 1999
SECTION: Metro Northwest; Pg. 1; Zone: Nw
BYLINE: Rogers Worthington
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that a proposal to double the property tax break given to those in 65-decibel-or-higher noise zones around Midway and O'Hare International Airports has drawn mixed reactions. Some say it's a good idea and will better protect residents, while others worry where the money would come from.
The article reports that a proposal to double the property tax break given to those in 65-decibel-or-higher noise zones around Midway and O'Hare International Airports has drawn mixed reactions. The idea is the brainchild of a tax lawyer -- Patrick Quinn -- who noticed that many homeowners near airports feel their home value is lower than what they are taxed for: because of noise.
The article notes that Quinn is holding meetings at both airports this week to decide whether there is enough support to pursue the issue. The tax break, called the "homestead exemption," would add $16-million -- assuming about 45,000 homes qualified -- to the existing $423-million in property tax credits.
The article goes on to say that reasons for opposition to the idea vary. One lawyer for residents around O'Hare Airport says that the break would take responsibility away from the airport and airlines that are making the noise in the first place. The Chairman of the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission said that he was concerned who would have to make up the difference in taxes collected.
The article notes that at least one Chicago-area mayor supports the idea, saying that reducing the noise-level designation to 65 from 70 decibels would allow many more residents to receive beneficial soundproofing. Many in the past have questioned how Chicago determines the areas impacted by the high noise levels.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Neighbor; Good Morning, Mount Prospect And Prospect Heights!; Pg. 1
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that students at Clearmont Elementary School in Elk Grove Village, Illinois will be relocated to a nearby school for four months in the 2000-2001 school year while their old school is soundproofed from noise at nearby O'Hare airport.
The article reports that students at Clearmont Elementary School in Elk Grove Village, Illinois will be relocated to a nearby school for four months in the 2000-2001 school year while their old school is soundproofed. The $4.3-million project is being funded mainly by the city of Chicago, which owns the nearby O'Hare International Airport. The upgrade will include upgrades to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems as well as the hot water system.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Neighbor; Good Morning, Buffalo Grove And Wheeling!; Pg. 1
DATELINE: Palwaukee, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that a noise consultant conducting a study for Palwaukee Municipal Airport in Illinois warned that the study didn't guarantee noise-abatement funds.
The article reports that a noise consultant conducting a study for Palwaukee Municipal Airport in Illinois warned that the study didn't guarantee noise-abatement funds. The 18-month study is meant to decide whether the airport is eligible for federal funds to reduce noise.
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Opinion; Pg. B8
BYLINE: Fred Stovel
DATELINE: Portland, Oregon
The Columbian prints several letters to the editor, one of which has to do with aircraft noise. The writer asks whether PDX really has "no authority over aircraft in flight" as it has claimed.
"Can PDX noise be lessened?
The well-researched Oct. 31 article, "Is life under the flight path too loud?" left me confused about what Port of Portland can do about airport noise. The ground run-up noise wasn't the port's problem, but it imposed a curfew and is building a hush house.
Glenn Woodman, the PDX noise abatement program director, says, "An airport has no authority over aircraft in flight." But in 1983, the Port of Portland established the river corridor as the standard flight path. And if airlines control the schedules, routing, frequency and time of day, as Woodman claims, how can the Palm Beach County commissioners vote, and the San Antonio residents "press" the federal government, to do something about noise?
Is there something about airport owners authority that might not be as limited as Woodman suggests? Maybe there's more to this story to uncover."
PUBLICATION: Denver Rocky Mountain News
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Ed. Final; Pg. 8B
BYLINE: Jane Fuller
DATELINE: Denver, Colorado
The Denver Rocky Mountain News prints several letters to the editor, one of which has to do with airport noise. A Denver, Colorado resident writes to disagree with the city attorney who said that Denver International Airport's noise doesn't harm anyone.
"Lakewood Unnecessary noise from DIA disrupts our thoughts and steals our peace.
"Concerning the $4 million in fines imposed on Denver for noise violations at Denver International Airport, I say it's about time. Denver City Attorney Dan Muse had a lot of nerve when he stated that "even if you assume there were technical violations, there was nobody harmed by it."
I feel harmed by the constant unnecessary noise that disrupts my thoughts and steals the peace from my home - noise that could be avoided if the flight plans at DIA took planes away from nearby cities instead of directly over them, as was originally promised.
There were a lot of promises made to the voters of Adams County and we trusted our commissioners to negotiate on our behalf. As far as I can tell most of the promises made were broken. I especially remember the agreement not to fly over Barr Lake State Park and disrupt the eagles and other birds that nest there, and yet DIA has continued to ignore that agreement as well.
I hope these fines will motivate those in charge to reroute flights and protect the quality of life for those of us who ignorantly trusted for Gov. Roy Romer, former Denver Mayor Federico Pena and the many others who have benefited from our loss of peace. I will encourage our county commissioners to keep after this issue as long as it takes."
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Pg.7
DATELINE: South Zeal, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that residents of South Zeal, U.K are urging Exeter campaigners to keep up their fight to resurface the new A30 with a quieter pavement. They say if Exeter campaigners don't keep up their fight, they would be forced to listen to highway noise for the rest of their lives.
The article reports that residents of South Zeal, U.K are urging Exeter campaigners to keep up their fight to resurface the new A30 with a quieter pavement. South Zeal residents say they've suffered in silence for ten years, but now say it was a mistake. They say if Exeter campaigners don't keep up their fight, they would be forced to listen to highway noise for the rest of their lives.
The article notes that Exeter campaigners had a recent victory when an official asked the Highways Agency to work with the campaigners to determine solutions to the noise problem. They've "held two public protests, launched a website and formed a petition with more than 2,000 signatures on it calling for the road to be resurfaced."
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 3; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Sue Fox
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Gerald Silver, president of Homeowners of Encino; Coby King, member of the Van Nuys Airport Citizens Advisory Council
The Los Angeles Times reports that the voluntary "fly-friendly" program -- which aims to reduce noise from Los Angeles' Van Nuys Airport -- causes a difference of opinion between anti-noise activists and airport officials. Airline officials and the airport worry about safety from low-noise take-offs, while noise activists say a handful of private jet owners with no consideration cause most of the problem.
The article reports that the voluntary "fly-friendly" program -- which aims to reduce noise from Los Angeles' Van Nuys Airport -- causes a difference of opinion between anti-noise activists and airport officials. Noise monitors at the ends of runways shows when airplanes exceed target decibel levels for their planes, and officials say only 8% of takeoffs go over these targets. Critics say this is 8% too many, and say that celebrity- and CEO-owned private jets cause much of the problem because there is no way to enforce the program.
The article notes that the target noise levels were set by the city's airport environmental manager, who combined data from manufacturers, aviation associations, and actual tests of engine noise. Each aircraft type has a different target noise level, and pilots can meet them by taking off more slowly, which increases the rate of climb. Some pilots are reluctant to do this because they say a slower-moving plane is more likely to have problems if it loses an engine.
The article goes on to say that limits were set at a level that half of the airport's planes were already meeting, and anti-noise activists say that should be a reasonable goal for the rest of the planes. Airline operators say that certain conditions such as overcast skies can make an otherwise considerate takeoff exceed the threshold. They also say that companies that fly most often may appear to be the worst offenders by the number of citations they receive, even though their violation percentage is well under the airport average.
The article notes that airport officials say that five years ago -- before the program was begun -- noise impacted .24 more square miles of land than the current 1.8 square miles: about 13 percent. The program suggests that Stage 2 aircraft not take off between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., while State 3 aircraft can take off until 11 p.m.
The article goes on to say that the airport receives about 90 complaints each month, but more than forty of those can come from a single activist. The city council is considering a ban on adding any additional stage 2 jets at the airport.
The article concludes by noting that although many would like to make the program mandatory, airport officials say that would increase liability if an airplane were to lose an engine and crash due to lack of speed. Also, the FAA would need to perform a costly environmental study before any mandatory program.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: National; Pg. 1A
BYLINE: James F. Sweeney
DATELINE: Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that residents of Ohio don't hold the same opinions about the 92 miles of walls in the state. Despite many people's praise of the walls, some neighborhoods like Warrensville Heights say that they want their walls torn down. The walls not only reduce noise by up to ten decibels -- an audible halving of the noise -- but help to block dirt from the road.
The article reports that residents of Ohio don't hold the same opinions about the 92 miles of walls in the state. Some say the walls are "an eyesore," and can actually worsen the noise. Most say that they are thankful for the walls, though they are admittedly ugly.
The article notes that the walls not only reduce noise by up to ten decibels -- an audible halving of the noise -- but help to block dirt from the road.
The article notes that despite many people's praise of the walls, some neighborhoods like Warrensville Heights say that they want their walls torn down; although residents have never pushed for something like that in the state, one wall was removed after a car dealership said it blocked their visibility from the road. In that case, the dealership helped to pay for the $80,000 removal of the 400-500 feet of wall, and others nearby were consulted.
The article goes on to say that wooden walls, used in the past, are a poor choice because they age "badly, shrinking to open gaps that greatly reduce their effectiveness."
PUBLICATION: South China Morning Post
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Parke View; Pg. 17
BYLINE: Robin Parke
DATELINE: Hong Kong
The South China Morning Post reports that Hong Kong Stadium is used for international sports events, but promoters have been unwilling to book concerts there since they could be fined up to $300,000 for a noise violation that disturb nearby luxury apartment residents. Promoters were expected to take the chance of paying fines on occasion as a cost of doing business, but tests suggested that there would likely be consistent fines that would be more costly.
The article reports that a Hong Kong legislator made a half-serious comment that the Hong Kong Stadium -- which doesn't make as much money as originally predicted -- should be torn down. The comment re-ignited a debate over which is more important: noise laws or economic benefit.
The article notes that the stadium is used for international sports events, but promoters have been unwilling to book concerts there since they could be fined up to $300,000 for a noise violation. As it is currently used, the stadium is a drain on local finances. The reporter said that Hong Kong's image is damaged when major acts like Celine Dion -- who can draw more than 60,000 in one show -- must perform at an airport instead of at an existing stadium.
The article goes on to say that when the arena was conceived, promoters figured they could take the chance of paying the $300,000 for the chance at revenue that dwarfed that amount. Tests suggested that the fans alone could break the noise limits, resulting in consistent fines that the promoters could not justify. Residents in luxury apartments around the stadium opposed the idea of concerts because of possible noise problems.
The article suggests that officials should designate a limited number of days in the year where concerts could break the noise laws up until 10:45 p.m. That way, most residents would not be disturbed often, but economic benefits could be enjoyed.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: North Of Tampa; Pg. 1
BYLINE: David Pedreira
DATELINE: Tampa, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times reports that noise is still a problem for residents in the area around Florida's Tampa International Airport, but airport officials say that noise has been decreasing and will decrease even further by 2003 thanks to noise-reduction policies.
The article reports that a noise study in progress, conducted at Florida's Tampa International Airport, points to the fact that noise is still a problem for residents in the area. Some residents say the noise has been getting worse in recent years. Airport officials say that it hasn't, and claim that by 2003 it will be even quieter.
The article notes that in the last 16 years, noise has quieted. It also says that by implementing policies that change flight paths and enforce existing federal noise laws, the number of homes in the 65-decibel noise zone will drop from 336 to 6 by 2003. Complaints were down 21 percent in 1998.
The article notes that some people are irritated by noise levels of 50-55 decibels, and at least three communities are subjected to at least 60 decibels. The FAA guidelines for providing noise insulation in homes begins at 65 decibels.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Outlook, Pg. 4H
BYLINE: Lori Kligfeld
DATELINE: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
The Sun-Sentinel prints several personal statements from environmentalists in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. One statement is from a woman who works against noise pollution from Southern Florida airports.
"We want to make sure the airlines are keeping up with phasing out of the noisy aircraft or the increase of the quiet aircraft.
We use the noise -monitoring system to ensure aircraft are following our noise abatement departure and arrival procedures. We've gone from a situation where the fleet mix in 1990 from Stage 3 (quieter airplanes) was 37 percent to most recently in August 1999, we were at nearly 84 percent.
Will it ever be 100 percent quiet out there? With the way South Florida is built up, I don't think there's a situation where it will be. But we're going to do everything we can to minimize the aircraft noise."
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: November 14, 1999
SECTION: Virginia Beach Beacon, Pg. 25
BYLINE: Noelle L. DuBois
DATELINE: Virginia Beach
The Virginian-Pilot prints several letters to the editor, including one from a realtor who says that home buyers must be informed about airport noise and crash zones before they buy.
"Realtors have duty to inform buyers about Oceana jet noise
I am a Realtor in Virginia Beach and just read the letter from the family complaining about jet noise. I noticed that this family got all the studies that weighed all the cost differences stating why Oceana was a better location for the jets than Cherry Point, N.C., and then they decided to move to another area of Virginia Beach.
When this family bought their home, were they not informed about noise and crash zones? If this family bought through a Realtor, we disclose the noise and crash zones and show them to you on a map. Oceana has been here a long time, and we need to be informed about where we purchase our homes if we feel that jet noise will bother us."
Previous week: November 7, 1999
Next week: November 21, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index