PUBLICATION: The Herald
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Sarah O'Donnell
DATELINE: Rock Hill, South Carolina
The Herald reports that a York County, South Carolina council member wants the council to fund a $4,000 noise study to determine if a ban on future residential development near the Rock Hill airport is necessary. The council member thinks rezoning decisions should not be based on data from a 1994 study, which could be outdated. Residents of Rock Hill were opposed to the idea of industrial zones near their neighborhoods, but were somewhat satisfied when the planning commission agreed to provide green space buffers between residents and any industrial zones.
The article reports that a York County, South Carolina council member wants the council to fund a $4,000 noise study to determine if a ban on future residential development near the Rock Hill airport is necessary. The proposed ban follows the rezoning of 216 acres of residential area within Rock Hill last year; the proposal would similarly rezone the areas near Rock Hill's Airport that are unincorporated.
The article notes that the council member thinks rezoning decisions should not be based on data from a 1994 study, which could be outdated. He believes that the airport's "good neighbor strategy" might have reduced noise since then. His reasons include the believe that there should be a good mix of residential and commercial development.
The article goes on to say that residents of Rock Hill were opposed to the idea of industrial zones near their neighborhoods, but were somewhat satisfied when the planning commission agreed to provide green space buffers between residents and any industrial zones.
PUBLICATION: Lewiston Morning Tribune
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: Local/Regional; Pg. 5A
BYLINE: Sandra Lee
DATELINE: Lewiston, Idaho
The Lewiston Morning Tribune reports that the Idaho Transportation Department is reluctant to approve a noise mitigation project that would use extra funds from a recent road construction in Lewiston. The city considers the noise mitigation a top priority, but the state wants to know how much it will cost before committing to it. Residents are upset, and some have even filed suit against the city.
The article reports that the Idaho Transportation Department is reluctant to approve a noise mitigation project that would use extra funds from the recent Bryden Canyon Road construction in Lewiston. The city considers the noise mitigation a top priority, but the state wants to know how much it will cost before committing to it.
The article notes that several other projects with known costs have been approved. Residents filed a tort claim, which asserts negligence, based on the "lack of a commitment on fixing the sound problem." Residents and council members are upset at the current noise levels, but remain convinced that the state will approve the project once the city's noise consultant finishes evaluation of the costs.
The article goes on to say that residents near the road have measured noise into the 70-decibel range, up from pre-construction levels in the 40-decibel range./P>
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: Local Pg. B-1:7; B-3:1
BYLINE: Anthony Millican
DATELINE: Loma Portal, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that San Diego port officials are offering to soundproof historic homes in Loma Portal, but have yet to decide how best to reduce noise while preserving historic architecture. Some residents don't care much about the historic value, but some do, and the port is currently studying noise-reduction at Minneapolis and Boston airports, as well as consulting with window manufacturers to explore their options.
The article reports that San Diego port officials are offering to soundproof historic homes in Loma Portal, but have yet to decide how best to reduce noise while preserving historic architecture. Nearby Lindbergh Field causes noise disturbance to residents there, but many changes -- especially vinyl-frame windows -- would compromise the historic nature of the homes.
The article notes that some residents don't care much about the historic value, and will leave it up to research that the port is currently conducting to decide what changes will be acceptable in light of preserving historic value; they are studying noise-reduction at Minneapolis and Boston airports, as well as consulting with window manufacturers to explore their options. Other residents will forego noise-reduction measures in order to preserve the character of their homes and neighborhood.
The article goes on to say that in five years up to 700 homes will be soundproofed in the first $25-million phase of the noise-reduction program: funded 80% by the federal government. Not all of the homes have wood-framed windows common in buildings from the early 1900s or before. The program must reduce noise by at least 5 decibels to be considered successful. Each home will cost about $40,000 to remodel.
The article concludes, noting that residents must sign an easement to receive noise-reduction; the easement says they will not seek legal damages for noisy overflights.
PUBLICATION: State-Times/Morning Advocate
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. X;3-B
BYLINE: Jeff Taylor, President of Citizens Association for Responsible Development
DATELINE: Gulfport, Mississippi
The State-Times/Morning Advocate reports that the Citizens Association for Responsible Development in Gulfport, Mississippi may sue to have a nearby gravel plant moved to another part of the county. The company has reduced it's noise, but vibrations are still bothersome. Engineers are studying the low frequency noise, and will report to county officials next month.
The article reports that the Citizens Association for Responsible Development in Gulfport, Mississippi may sue to have a nearby gravel plant moved to another part of the county. Noise and vibrations have bothered residents since it opened in August.
The article notes that the company has built two 100-foot soundwalls to block noise, and has installed rubber pads on a noisy machine. Residents say the noise is better but low-frequency vibrations are still bothersome. Mississippi State University engineers are helping to conduct a study of the low frequency noise; county supervisors will decide whether to move the plant next month when they receive the results.
PUBLICATION: South China Morning Post
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 6
BYLINE: Quinton Chan
DATELINE: China
The South China Morning Post reports that an amendment to the Noise Control Ordinance will make company executives liable for any noise violations that their company creates. While companies say making one person liable is unfair, government officials say that someone has to be made responsible since the current system isn't working well. Fines will range up to $200,000 for each offense, about ten times the current fines.
The article reports that an amendment to the Noise Control Ordinance will make company executives liable for any noise violations that their company creates (the article did not make it clear which part of the country the ordinance covers). The previous system allowed the company to bear responsibility as a whole. The amendment changes enforcement of noise laws to mimic current pollution laws.
The article notes that while companies say making one person liable is unfair, government officials say that someone has to be made responsible since the current system isn't working well. Some companies regularly break noise laws 12 times each year.
The article goes on to say that under the new amendment, fines will range up to $200,000 for each offense; current fines are only about one-tenth of that. Builders are often the worst offenders, and the law will likely impose higher fines for builders. Builders argue that noise offenses are often committed by subcontractors who the construction company has little control over.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 13, 1999
SECTION: City & State; Pg. 1B
BYLINE: David Pedreira
DATELINE: Tampa, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times reports that only six homes in Hillsborough County, Florida qualify for soundproofing that will reduce noise from Tampa International Airport. Last year 336 homes qualified, but now only the six appear to be in the 65 decibel impact area.
The article reports that only six homes in Hillsborough County, Florida qualify for soundproofing that will reduce noise from Tampa International Airport. The large, expensive homes -- which sit directly under a landing path -- will cost about $60,000 each to renovate with thicker windows, solid doors, and other noise reducing insulation.
The article notes that all the homeowners knew they were moving under a flight path, and yet they have not lobbied for soundproofing. Last year 336 homes qualified, but now only the six appear to be in the 65 decibel impact area. Noise-reduction efforts planned by the airport include requiring passenger planes to use Stage III engines, keeping flight paths over water more often, and an enclosure for jet-engine testing.
PUBLICATION: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 3A
BYLINE: W. Thomas Smith Jr.
DATELINE: Columbia, South Carolina
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution reports that a peace organization in Columbia, South Carolina are saying that practice military operations in downtown areas creates too much noise. he operations are designed to train Marines in urban warfare situations such as those that could arise in places like Kosovo.
The article reports that a peace organization in Columbia, South Carolina are saying that practice military operations in downtown areas creates too much noise. They cite noise complaints from residents, as well as concerns of weapons on helicopters pointed to near to civilians nearby.
The article notes that the operations are designed to train Marines in urban warfare situations such as those that could arise in places like Kosovo. Marines are using live explosives, but are using only blank ammunition. Other cities that have been used for similar operations since 1985 are Memphis, New Orleans, Richmond, Birmingham and Atlanta.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. N28
BYLINE: Editorial Staff
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that the Los Angeles City Council finally seems to be taking a strong stance on airport-noise reduction and fairness. It has finally said that it will sue if the Airport blocks takeoffs over Glendale and Pasadena, which would force flights over Los Angeles communities. In the past, the council has largely ignored noise concerns from residents near Van Nuys Airport and Los Angeles International Airport.
The article reports that the Los Angeles City Council finally seems to be taking a strong stance on airport-noise reduction and fairness. The Council stayed out of recent debates at Burbank Airport, but has finally said that it will sue if the Airport blocks takeoffs over Glendale and Pasadena, which would force flights over Los Angeles communities.
The article notes that the city council has also ignored concerns from residents near Van Nuys Airport who complain about noise: largely from private jets owned by celebrities and CEOs. Also, the council has not come considered noise problems seriously enough in the plan for expansion of Los Angeles International Airport which could worsen noise, pollution, and traffic problems.
The article concludes, noting that the city council should pull together all involved, and establish a long-term plan that considers economic AND social aspects of airports.
PUBLICATION: Daily News
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Suburban; Pg. 9
BYLINE: Robert Gearty
DATELINE: New York City
The Daily News reports that Long Island Railroad has agreed to replace the horns on a fleet of 46 new locomotives for a total cost of $125,000. The new horns will be just as loud, but will be less perceptible and annoying.
The article reports that Long Island Railroad has agreed to replace the horns on a fleet of 46 new locomotives for a total cost of $125,000. The horns were originally too shrill, and the company received many complaints from politicians and residents.
The article notes that the new horns will be just as loud, but will be less perceptible and annoying. They will also be positioned in front of the train instead of in the middle, and will allow conductors to have more control over the duration of the sound. Conductors must sound their horns at every grade crossing by law.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Chronicle
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Local News, Pg. 25
BYLINE: Peter Young
DATELINE: Newcastle, United Kingdom
The Evening Chronicle reports that residents of Newcastle, U.K. are opposing a proposal to revive stock car racing at a community speedway. Stock car racing was first proposed in 1981, and was subsequently stopped by the council for being too noisy
The article reports that residents of Newcastle, U.K. are opposing a proposal to revive stock car racing at a community speedway. The stadium currently hosts greyhound races and speedway events, and residents think that noise is bad enough.
The article notes that stock car racing was first proposed in 1981, and was subsequently stopped by the council for being too noisy, as a result of legal action.
PUBLICATION: The Hartford Courant
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. A16
DATELINE: Suffield, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant asserts that in addition to testing quieter alternative flight paths at Bradley International Airport in Suffield, realtors should be forced to tell home buyers about noise impacts.
The article reports that Connecticut's Department of Transportation is testing alternative flight paths at Bradley International Airport in Suffield to reduce the number of people who experience noise. Another idea is to force realtors to tell prospective home buyers about noise impacts in a particular neighborhood.
PUBLICATION: The Indianapolis Star
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Metro West; Pg. W01
BYLINE: Linda Balough
DATELINE: Brownsburg, Indiana
The Indianapolis Star reports that a resident living near a trap-shooting club in Brownsburg, Indiana urged the town not to convert the facility into a police firing range. She came with substantial evidence, including maps and guidelines for the creation of firing ranges. The town is currently conducting a study that will look at noise and safety issues.
The article reports that a resident living near a trap-shooting club in Brownsburg, Indiana urged the town council not to go through with converting the facility into a police firing range that would operate between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. She came prepared with substantial supporting evidence, including maps and guidelines developed by the National Rifle Association for the creation of firing ranges.
The article notes that she showed how there were over 100 residents within a quarter mile of the facility, while guidelines say that noise complaints will become a problem within a half mile of residences. She noted that police weapons can have a range of up to one-mile, raising safety questions.
The article goes on to say that the resident questioned cost effectiveness of the facility, since paying overtime for officers to go to another facility cost $3,000 per year while maintenance of the range would cost $10,000. The town has not committed to buying the property, and is conducting a study that will look at noise and safety issues. They thanked the resident for the information.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: November 12, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. 3B
DATELINE: Independence, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that a noise ordinance has been approved in Independence, Ohio that addresses excessive amplified noise and construction noise.
The article reports that a noise ordinance has been approved in Independence, Ohio that addresses excessive amplified noise and construction noise. The ordinance would allow fines of up to $500 and a jail-term of up to 60 days for those who played stereos, TVs, or instruments loud enough to be heard fifty feet away between 11 p.m. and a.m. The source could also be taken by police.
The article notes that loud construction equipment, such as "earth-moving, ditch-digging, grading, loading or excavating equipment, or compressed-air hammers, drills and similar road equipment" will not be allowed between 6:30 p.m. and 9 a.m. Those violations can include a fine of up to $750 fine or 60 day jail term.
PUBLICATION: Bristol Evening Post
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.37
BYLINE: Suzannah Marsh
DATELINE: Bishopsworth, United Kingdom
The Bristol Evening Post reports that a Bishopsworth, U.K. businessman -- who runs a roofing business and a trucking business off of one site in the area -- is being told it will have to move within six months because of noise problems. The businessman asserts that the noise is coming from other businesses around the area, and not from his own. He may appeal the decision.
The article reports that a Bishopsworth, U.K. businessman -- who runs a roofing business and a trucking business off of one site in the area -- is being told it will have to move within six months because of noise problems. The businessman asserts that the noise is coming from other businesses around the area, and not from his own.
The article notes that although the firm is supposed to be out in February, the business owner complained that he has not had time to explain his case to planners. He says he may appeal the decision. He says "I turn up at half past seven in the morning and my men turn up at quarter to eight and they are all gone for the day out on their jobs by quarter past eight. So I can't see that we are doing anything wrong."
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 6
BYLINE: Kate Clements
DATELINE: West Dundee, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that West Dundee, Illinois is considering a noise ordinance that would restrict amplified noise, construction noise, and trash collection. Fines will range from $5 to $500, and maintenance of public property will be exempted.
The article reports that West Dundee, Illinois is considering a noise ordinance that would prohibit amplified noise from being heard 50 feet away between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., and would prohibit trash collection between 7 p.m. and 6 a.m. Lawn/garden and construction equipment can not be used after 1:30 p.m and before 7 a.m.
The article notes that before the ordinance is passed, officials may make the start-times one hour later on weekends and holidays. Fines will range from $5 to $500. Exempted activities will include maintenance of public property by the town and emergency situations.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 12
BYLINE: Chris Fusco
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Jack Saporito, Head of the Alliance of Residents Concerning O'Hare
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that a proposal to double the property tax exemption for homeowners affected by Chicago-area airports has gained support from the Alliance of Residents Concerning O'Hare. Officials worry that other tax districts would have to pick up the tab, but some say that "previous court decisions require airports to reimburse taxing districts for lost tax revenue."
The article reports that a proposal to double the property tax exemption for homeowners affected by Chicago-area airports has gained support from activist Jack Saporito, head of the Alliance of Residents Concerning O'Hare. The exemption would be increased to $300-500, and city and school officials worry that other tax districts would have to pick up the tab. Another group, the Suburban O'Hare Commission says that it believes "previous court decisions require airports to reimburse taxing districts for lost tax revenue."
The article notes that homeowners would be judged eligible for the exemption if noise levels reached an average of 65 decibels. A sponsor must be found to initiate the bill in the general assembly.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N1
BYLINE: Beth Barrett
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that the California Department of Transportation has redesigned a highway interchange project to keep the road further from a mall. The mall protested that noise from a road as close as the original plans called for would be too noisy; Warner Brothers plans to move hundreds of employees into a facility there.
The article notes that the original plans brought the road within 22 feet of the mall, while the new plan is 36 feet away at its closest point. The highway was redesigned without compromising lane width or any other feature that would compromise its transportation function. One major change was the "pitch of ramps, which affect how much total space is required." The 101-405 interchange as it stands is seen as the largest impediment to smooth transportation around the Los Angeles area.
The article goes on to say that barriers and grooved pavement will also help reduce noise from the highway. If the highway had not been redesigned so quickly, the delay could have cost the project its funding for another three years.
The article notes that in the past the entertainment industry was moving out of the city, and this commitment by Warner Brothers symbolizes increasing city-based jobs in the entertainment industry.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N3
BYLINE: Rick Orlov
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that Los Angeles officials are putting together a negotiating team that will pressure the Burbank Airport Authority to consider alternative flight paths. Burbank Airport says it will consider L.A.'s comments, but also say that several alternative flight paths have already been deemed ineffective at reducing noise.
The article reports that Los Angeles officials are putting together a negotiating team that will pressure the Burbank Airport Authority to consider alternative flight paths. Officials say that currently, Burbank is disregarding Los Angeles completely in favor of catering only to their citizens.
The article notes that L.A. plans to file a suit against the airport unless a new environmental study is done that includes consideration of L.A. Burbank Airport says it will consider L.A.'s comments. They also say that several alternative flight paths -- including one that would circle south but not reduce jet noise, and another that is banned by the FAA for interfering with Los Angeles International Airport -- have already been deemed ineffective.
The article goes on to say that some L.A. councilmen believe the city should have bought part of the airport twenty years ago when they had the chance. Others noted that the city "would have had only three of seven votes,... [ending] up with none of the power and all of the liability."
PUBLICATION: The Denver Post
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Denver & The West; Pg. B-02
BYLINE: Ginny McKibben
DATELINE: Denver, Colorado
The Denver Post reports that County Commissioners in Arapahoe County, Colorado -- which includes Denver -- have suspended development on a total of 30.7 square miles surrounding four airports in the region. New rules could include sound insulation, and a larger minimum distance between houses and the airport. By February, results should be available from a noise study being conducted at Centennial Airport that can help make decision-making easier.
The article reports that County Commissioners in Arapahoe County, Colorado -- which includes Denver -- have suspended development on a total of 30.7 square miles surrounding four airports in the region. One of the airports is Centennial airport, which draws about 8,000 noise complaints each year. In four months, the commissioners will consider whether stricter rules should be imposed on developments in the area.
The article notes that new rules could include sound insulation, and a larger minimum distance between houses and the airport. Already, 6,226 residential units are located in the affected areas, and 1,040 building permits are currently active. Centennial Airport recently turned down several development requests that placed buildings under the departing flightpath, but Greenwood village overrode another county decision and placed homes 7,000 feet from the airport "right on the extended center line of the runway.'
The article notes that by February, results should be available from a noise study being conducted at Centennial Airport that can help make decision-making easier.
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Transport: Airports - East Midlands Airport, Pg.17
DATELINE: North West Leicestershire, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that an anti-noise group in the U.K. called People Against Intrusive Noise (PAIN) has issued a list of demands to officials at East Midlands Airport and North West Leicestershire Council. Demands include installation of a noise monitoring system, restricted flying at night, and designated flight paths that disturb fewer residents. The airport plans to extend their runway soon, which has spurred the residents to action.
The article reports that an anti-noise group in the U.K. called People Against Intrusive Noise (PAIN) has issued a list of demands to officials at East Midlands Airport and North West Leicestershire Council. Residents have felt ignored by officials, and say that noise at the airport is worsening.
The article notes that the demands include installation of a noise monitoring system and the establishment of specific decibel limits. They also want restricted flying between 10 p.m and 7 a.m., enclosures for engine-testing, and designated flight paths that disturb fewer residents.
The article goes on to say that the airport plans to extend their runway soon, which has spurred the residents to action. The runway was first proposed in April, but a more detailed environmental assessment was needed. Residents believe that this new assessment will be provided soon, and worry that they will have to endure even more noise.
PUBLICATION: Evening Herald
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Boxfile: Community News, Pg.14
DATELINE: Mutley Plain, United Kingdom
The Evening Herald reports that a Mutley Plain, U.K. sports bar has been granted a license to hold karaoke nights on Thursdays. The owner said that even though noise levels will be relatively low, neighbors might be able to hear sound. Neighbors were concerned about the noise, and the license rests on the promise that "noise could not be heard by the closest residents."
The article reports that a Mutley Plain, U.K. sports bar has been granted a license to hold karaoke nights on Thursdays. Six neighbors complained, saying they were worried about noise.
The article notes that the owner believes noise will not be much of a problem since the bar is located next to a noisy intersection. He does say that even though noise levels will be relatively low, neighbors might be able to hear sound. That admission seemed strange, since the license rests on the promise that "noise could not be heard by the closest residents."
PUBLICATION: The Morning Call
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Bethlehem, Pg. B5
BYLINE: Tracy Jordan
DATELINE: Nazareth, Pennsylvania
The Morning Call reports that a 1.7-mile, $10- to $15-million conveyor proposed by a limestone company in Nazareth, Pennsylvania shouldn't add much noise to the area. The company claims the conveyor will not be louder than 50 decibels. In fact, it will eliminate the need for the 250 daily truck trips that the company now needs to transport limestone along an already congested road.
The article reports that a 1.7-mile, $10- to $15-million conveyor proposed by a limestone company in Nazareth, Pennsylvania shouldn't add much noise to the area. A city-commissioned noise study -- designed to verify a previous study conducted by the company -- showed that noise won't increase by very much in the area. The study cost $8,900, but the company is reimbursing the city.
The article goes on to say that the company claims the conveyor will not be louder than 50 decibels. The local decibel limit is 65 decibels. In fact, many officials favor the plan because it will eliminate the need for the 250 daily truck trips that the company now needs to transport limestone; the road they use is heavily congested.
The article goes on to say that decibels don't add together in a logical way. For example, "a 90 decibel device [added] to an area with sounds at 100 decibels only increases the decibel level to 100.4."
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. A14
BYLINE: Ted Crichton
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News and Record prints a letter to the editor from a Greensboro, North Carolina resident who questions why the switch from Stage 2 to Stage 3 noise levels -- required by the federal government after December 31, 1999 -- was given such cursory consideration in a recent article about FedEx's proposed hub.
"Noisy FedEx?
Your Nov. 7 front-page article about noise from the proposed FedEx operation at Piedmont Triad International Airport made a forceful case against that operation. But, I noticed you gave very little discussion to the Federal Stage 3 noise requirements. (One short paragraph).
These requirements mandate that all commercial airlines and cargo carriers either replace their fleets with Stage 3 aircraft or retrofit their aircraft to meet the new Stage 3 levels by the year 2000.
This is a big change. It means that noise levels must be reduced by 10 decibels (that's more than half). Do the noise footprints shown in your article show Stage 3 or the existing Stage 2? You should explain so the public knows exactly what to expect. The 727s shown on the front page are Stage 2 aircraft and are not representative of what will happen here. Stage 3 will happen, and noise levels will be significantly less.
Editor's note: The jet noise maps of both Piedmont Triad and Indianapolis airports were based on Stage 3 projections."
PUBLICATION: The Record
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: News; One Star B, Also In, Three Star B; Pg. L1
BYLINE: Pia Sarkar
DATELINE: Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
The Record reports that New York's Susquehanna and Western Railway has been given another month by a municipal judge to address noise complaints. The railroad has been given seven summonses for train noise from engines that idle at night. The company is looking into adding additional track to form a spur in a more isolated section of town, but asked for more time to determine feasibility
The article reports that New York's Susquehanna and Western Railway has been given another month by a municipal judge to address noise complaints. The complaints come from residents who live as close as 150 feet to the tracks where diesel engines idling at night. Train operators say it is very difficult to shut down a diesel engine simply to turn it on again in several hours.
The article notes that the railroad has been given seven summonses for train noise. The company is looking into adding additional track to form a spur in a more isolated section of town, but asked for more time to determine feasibility.
The article goes on to say that the company believes it is "well within [their] rights to continue operating," but also says they will move the tracks if a study of feasibility supports the idea. The company has asked the judge to dismiss the summonses.
PUBLICATION: The San Francisco Chronicle
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. A36; Letters To The Editor
BYLINE: Carol Rooney
DATELINE: San Francisco, California
The San Francisco Chronicle prints several letters to the editor, one of which criticizes a recent letter that discounted noise problems from San Francisco International Airport.
"AIRPORT NOISE
Editor -- Airport Director John Martin's attempt to quell the harsh words of Foster City Mayor Deborah Wilder (Letters, November 3) fell on deaf ears. Everyone who lives in the flight path of San Francisco International Airport knows the noise has increased dramatically in the last five years. John Martin's noise abatement program has done nothing to abate the noise in my neighborhood.
And all this talk of "airfield reconfiguration" really means is "fill in the bay to add more runway footage" to accommodate the expected growth of airport traffic in the next century. You said so yourself, John. Remember? That was before you learned how to say what you don't want people to understand. Keep talking, John, because we can't hear you anymore. But we still know who's zooming who."
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Opinion Pg. B-13:7,8; B-15:2,3
BYLINE: Cheryl Hays, Tom Burke
DATELINE: San Diego, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune prints several letters to the editor, two of which pertain to helicopter noise from Miramar military base. The first writer suggests consideration of an alternative flight path, while the second says there are bigger problems to complain about than noise.
"Helicopter routes and more noise about noise
Re: "Choose helicopter route on safety and cost" (Letters, Nov. 7):
Could Don MacNeill please explain how flying an additional 15 to 20 miles inland over I-15, as the Miramar helicopters do now, is more cost effective than flying a direct path to Pendleton? Anyone with a map can determine that the direct path would be over I-5.
Flying over the ocean is the best-case scenario for safety, since no homes or schools would be in the flight path. It also would be only a couple miles out of the way.
We must keep in mind that the Marine helicopters are merely commuting to work like the rest of us. They are leaving their "garages" at Miramar to train elsewhere. CHERYL HAYS Escondido
The Nov. 4 letter by Jerry Hargarten of MARCH arguing that the quieter Marine V-22 Osprey helicopters will not solve the noise problem in the future is the last straw. This guy is just too much. When is he going to admit defeat?
The Marines have spent more than $134 million at Miramar and have brought a lot of employment to San Diego. Anyone who has been to Miramar lately can easily see the Corps will be there for some time to come. If Hargarten must have a "cause," why not attack the city and mayor for not providing more economical housing for the Navy and Marine personnel who have to live here? What they have to pay for rent is a real crime. TOM BURKE Rancho Bernardo"
PUBLICATION: Seattle Weekly
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Mail; Pg. 4
BYLINE: Ethan Devinatz
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
The Seattle Weekly prints several letters to the editor, one of which questions a recent article that criticized a recently vetoed noise ordinance.
"SHHHHHH!
Roger Downey's article "Shut up, Seattle!" (10/21) on the recently vetoed new noise ordinance is a morass of misleading and incorrect statements. Let me cite just a few. Mr. Downey makes fun of what he sees as the vagueness of the ordinance's section on public disturbance noise, not realizing that in fact this section makes more specific the corresponding section in the old (current) noise ordinance. Moreover, the term "plainly audible" is defined in the new noise ordinance, and although there will always be borderline cases, this standard is, for the most part, quite clear. Those who claim that it is too vague really mean that they don't like it.
Mr. Downey also refers to the council's proposed time, place, and manner restrictions on the noise exemption given for picketing, marches, rallies, or parades as on "thin ice legally"; here again he doesn't know what he's talking about. I am not aware of any other city--including Seattle under the current law--which grants such exemptions to its noise ordinance; furthermore, it is well accepted by the courts that cities have the right to place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on such events.
Finally, Mr. Downey's description of Margaret Pageler as "zealous to secure the sleep of the righteous from voices of dissent" is just plain stupid; Ms. Pageler was concerned that a blanket exemption could be abused in very egregious ways--ways which really have little to do with freedom of expression.
The salient points regarding the new noise ordinance are really these: 1) All residents--including those living in the central city--of Seattle have the right to a reasonable degree of peace and quiet in their own home. There will certainly be more traffic and street noise in the central city, but it is not reasonable to have music from a neighboring club set your windows vibrating, nor is it reasonable to have an outdoor party under your windows at 2am. It is astonishing how many noise ordinance opponents do not accept these obvious statements. 2) Unwanted unnecessary noise is not trivial. As a victim of noise from a club with an outdoor bar area, my life has been disrupted, my career has been damaged, and I may, quite possibly, be forced from my own home, at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars. Had Mr. Downey attended any of the public hearings, he would have learned of the damage noise can do and would not have been so smug. 3) Many club and bar owners have treated their neighbors with contempt for years, refusing to acknowledge that they have any right at all to peace and quiet. These owners keep whining about how the proposed ordinance would shut down night life, yet they refuse to install soundproofing, refuse to keep their doors and windows closed, refuse to encourage patrons to leave quietly, and refuse to close down outdoor bar areas early. (It is in fact the law in Chicago--a city where some bars serve drinks until 5am--that all outdoor eating/drinking establishments must move inside at midnight."
PUBLICATION: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: West Post, Pg. 3
BYLINE: Phil Sutin
DATELINE: Richmond Heights, Missouri
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that a commuter rail system will be expanded through Richmond Heights, near St. Louis Missouri. Each station along the route, a neighborhood committee will be formed to discuss concerns with the developers in charge of the project. Additional noise studies may be performed along the route to determine any problem areas. Noise walls may be placed in some areas.
The article reports that a commuter rail system will be expanded through Richmond Heights, near St. Louis Missouri. A recent public meeting, attended by about 80, revealed that the city's concerns are mainly "sight, sound and safety," and noise will be a consideration in the plans. The project will cost $404-million in total and should be completed by 2005.
The article notes that for each station along the route, a neighborhood committee will be formed to discuss concerns with the developers in charge of the project. Some residents have already asked for a rerouting of the tracks, saying that they are too far from commercial development. A park and ride lane will be installed at Interstate 170, near the proposed line. Fencing will be provided in areas where safety demands it, and landscaping would be used to create safety barriers in some places.
The article goes on to say that additional noise studies may be performed along the route to determine any problem areas. Noise walls may be placed in some areas; some will be low to reduce noise from train wheels on the rails, and others will be full-sized to block all of the noise.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. 1A
BYLINE: Stella M. Chavez
DATELINE: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
The Sun-Sentinel reports that Florida's Department of Transportation plans to install 16 soundwalls at certain places on route 441 in Palm Beach County. Some oppose the noise walls, saying they will attract graffiti and drive property values down. Many of them want an options not included on the survey: a berm with a shorter noise wall on top. Officials say the berm would be too costly and would shrink people's back yards.
The article reports that Florida's Department of Transportation plans to install 16 soundwalls at certain places on route 441 in Palm Beach County. The decision comes after a survey that asked residents whether they'd prefer a noise wall, another visual barrier, or no barrier at all. Federal rules require that noise walls be considered when expanding a federally-funded highway where noise levels reach 67 decibels.
The article notes that some oppose the noise walls, saying they will attract graffiti and drive property values down. Many of them want an options not included on the survey: a berm with a shorter noise wall on top. Officials say the berm would be too costly and would shrink people's back yards because three feet of width is needed to support every foot of height in a berm. In May, 200 people picketed against noise walls.
The article goes on to say that three neighborhoods, originally considered candidates for the soundwalls, agreed that they would prefer areca palm trees which will "help hide the road and traffic but do nothing to reduce noise."
PUBLICATION: Western Morning News
DATE: November 11, 1999
SECTION: Pg.
DATELINE: East Devon, United Kingdom
The Western Morning News reports that those protesting noise from the new A30 in East Devon, U.K. gained the support of the Transport Minister this week; he called for investigation into the noise and cooperation between the noise consultants and residents. The article discusses the history of the problem including a similar successful campaign elsewhere in England, and details about the surface.
The article reports that those protesting noise from the new A30 in East Devon, U.K. gained the support of the Transport Minister this week; he called for investigation into the noise and cooperation between the noise consultants and residents. Residents say that the brushed concrete surface is too loud, and want it resurfaced.
The article notes that the A30 has been prone to congestion problems for years. It was finally upgraded using a "Design, Build, Finance and Operate" plan which calls for private funders to build and maintain the road for 30 years, while the Highways Agency pays them "shadow tolls" for each car using it. Ten days after the new A30 opened, a hearing was held and 200 residents attended.
The article goes on to say that at first, the Highways Agency simply said the road would not be resurfaced for twenty years and noise levels wouldn't even be taken for a year. Pressure from residents and local representatives encouraged the transport minister to launch this early investigation. Pressure tactics included two demonstrations on bridges over the highway and a 2000-signature petition.
The article notes that brushed concrete is one of the loudest surfaces available, but it was used because it provides excellent traction and requires little maintenance. At the pre-construction public inquiry, developers promised noise would get up to 58.9 decibels, but actual levels have been measured at 69.3. Part of this increase is due to the fact that the depth of the brush marks in the concrete are 1.61 millimeters; this doubling from the recommended .87 millimeter depth raises decibel levels by about 2.4, which sounds as loud as a doubling in traffic on the road.
The article notes that 13 miles of the A1 was resurfaced in June after campaigners there were successful in proving that "contractors had ignored the recommendations of a planning inspector for a low noise surface to be used." The chairman of Tarmac, a construction company, said they can add a "noise -retardant substance which makes traveling so quiet that signs have erected telling motorists there is nothing wrong with their vehicles."
PUBLICATION: Aberdeen Press and Journal
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Peterhead: Fishmarket, Pg.3
BYLINE: Leanne Carter
DATELINE: Peterhead, United Kingdom
The Aberdeen Press and Journal reports that approval of a proposed deep-water fish market, proposed for Peterhead Harbour in the U.K., has been delayed by at least three weeks to allow for further investigation into potential noise disturbances there. Harbour trustees are upset, saying they've already waited long enough already, and that they won't know how to best mitigate noise until the market is built.
The article reports that approval of a proposed deep-water fish market, proposed for Peterhead Harbour in the U.K., has been delayed by at least three weeks to allow for further investigation into potential noise disturbances there.
The article notes that merchants and harbour trustees are upset, saying they've already waited long enough already, and asking why noise experts' opinions already solicited by the trustees wasn't enough to assure few problems.
The article says that the council emphasizes noise mitigation, calling for a specific plan to counteract the noise that is projected to slightly breach noise limits. The harbour trustees say that until the market is built, no one knows what noise there will be to mitigate.
The article goes on to say that neighbors are not only concerned about noise but also about traffic, view, and seagull disturbances.
PUBLICATION: The Arizona Republic
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Northeast Phoenix Community; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Michelle Craig
DATELINE: Phoenix, Arizona
The Arizona Republic reports that noise and dust from the Squawk Peak freeway in Arizona has been bothering residents for the five months it has been open. Noise was not originally measured above 65 decibels: the benchmark that requires sound walls. The state says it will reevaluate noise levels there, but residents aren't confident that anything will be done.
The article reports that noise and dust from the Squawk Peak freeway in Arizona has been bothering residents for the five months it has been open. They say that while the state claims many water trucks are on duty to compact dirt and prevent dust, only one such truck is being used in the four-mile stretch nearest their homes.
The article notes that noise was not originally measured above 65 decibels, the benchmark that requires sound walls. The state says it will reevaluate noise levels there, but residents aren't confident; they've been hearing that line for five years. They claim that they were told that walls would be erected. All they've gotten so far is foam padding to put in their windows.
PUBLICATION: Bangor Daily News
DATE: November 10, 1999
BYLINE: Leanne M. Robicheau
DATELINE: Rockland, Maine
The Bangor Daily News reports that the city council of Rockland, Maine has rejected a proposed change to the noise ordinance that would have increased the decibel level that was allowed downtown. The deciding vote came from a council member who changed her mind when she heard that noise was audible up to 1.5 miles away from a downtown nightclub.
The article reports that the city council of Rockland, Maine has rejected a proposed change to the noise ordinance that would have increased the decibel level that was allowed downtown. They had also proposed adding a new time zone that would have different noise limits; the new zones would have been 11 p.m to 7 a.m., 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 9 p.m. to 11 p.m.
The article notes that the deciding vote came from a council member who changed her mind when she heard that noise was audible up to 1.5 miles away from a downtown nightclub. She was not originally impressed when a next-door neighbor complained about the noise, but the distance it travels caused her to change her vote. The nightclub owner said that this neighbor had complained 17 times in the last year, while he was cited for excessive noise only once.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 18
BYLINE: Tim Novak
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times reports that a noise case against a Cook County, Illinois judge has been reassigned after the first judge said she was a friend of the defendant/judge. The judge plans to carpet his granite floors, though he claims that much of the noise his neighbor complains about is not produced by them.
The article reports that a noise case against a Cook County, Illinois judge has been reassigned after the first judge said she was a friend of the defendant/judge. The plaintiff, who wants to stop the judge's sale of his condo -- which is above his own -- until granite floors are replaced.
The article notes that the judge plans to carpet the floors, though he claims that much of the noise is not produced by them.
PUBLICATION: Coventry Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 5
DATELINE: Coventry, England
The Coventry Evening Telegraph reports that a Labour MP of Rugby and Kenilworth, U.K. is backing a campaign to give local authorities more power to regulate airport noise.
The article reports that a Labour MP of Rugby and Kenilworth is backing a campaign to give local authorities more power to regulate airport noise. The problem has arisen at Coventry and Birmingham airports where constituents feel powerless against noise.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N3
BYLINE: Lee Condon
DATELINE: Burbank, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that three congressmen from the Los Angeles, California area asked the FAA to lift a twenty year ban on eastern takeoffs at Burbank Airport. Los Angeles officials say the ban is unfairly directing flights over Los Angeles, but Burbank officials say eastern takeoffs are more dangerous because of mountains and traffic from Los Angeles International Airport. Also, Burbank residents have come to expect quiet.
The article reports that three congressmen from the Los Angeles, California area asked the FAA to lift a twenty year ban on eastern takeoffs at Burbank Airport. The ban was instituted in part because the terminal was too close to the runway, but a new expansion will mean this is no longer the case. Los Angeles officials say the ban is unfairly directing flights over Los Angeles.
The article notes that Burbank officials say that pilots don't want to takeoff to the east anyway, because of the mountainous terrain and the fact that Los Angeles International Airport uses flight paths in that airspace. They also say that residents in Burbank and Glendale have gotten used to the current situation, and don't want new noise-complaint problems.
The article goes on to say that the FAA will try to stay out of politics, making the decision based on safety.
PUBLICATION: The Denver Post
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Denver & The West; Pg. B-04
BYLINE: Kieran Nicholson
DATELINE: Jefferson County, Colorado
The Denver Post reports that Jefferson County, Colorado commissioners rejected a proposal for a quarry on Scar Top Mountain. According to the company, technology would have reduced water, air, and noise pollution, but commissioners sided with residents, open-space advocates, and water experts that worried about possible environmental repercussions.
The article reports that Jefferson County, Colorado commissioners rejected a proposal for a quarry on Scar Top Mountain. A 1982 proposal for a quarry there was also rejected, but the company had made many changes to its proposal and expected to be approved this time.
The article notes that the quarry would have extracted 1.5-million tons of aggregate rock every year for fifty years. Trains would have been used to remove the rock -- instead of trucks suggested in the 1980s proposal -- and according to the company, technology would have reduced water, air, and noise pollution.
The article goes on to say that open-space advocates and neighbors argued against the quarry, citing noise, pollution, and safety issues. A water expert testified, saying "There is a lot of uncertainty about the (water) system in the area."
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Pg.1
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports the Roads Minister in Exeter, U.K. has initiated the reevaluation of traffic noise along the A30. This article offers little information not covered in other summarized articles on this site, but it does differ in the reported depth of the brushed concrete ridges: an aspect of the surface that makes it noisy.
The article reports the Roads Minister Lord Whitty in Exeter, U.K. has initiated the reevaluation of traffic noise along the A30, where residents have been campaigning for a quieter surface. This article offers little information not covered in other summarized articles on this site, but it does differ in certain 'facts.'
The article notes that in other articles, the brushed concrete surface was said to be 1.6 millimeters deep, as opposed to an originally estimated .78 millimeter depth. This article says that the actual depth is more like 1.02 millimeters. The depth of the brushed ridges increases noise produced when tires drive over it.
PUBLICATION: The Ledger
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. A12
BYLINE: Thomas S. Pletcher, Albert Eskenazi
DATELINE: Lakeland, Florida
The Ledger prints two letters to the editor praising the recent move by a judge to require noise-offenders to listen to classical music as their sentence.
"Noisy Impositions
What a delight to read in the Oct. 30 Ledger about Judge Anne Kaylor's lenient "sentence" of the 15 insensitive, young nitwits who assumed, as do all the others out there, that their preference in the noise pollution they call music, was what anyone else liked. I happen to be a jazz musician and would never expect everyone around me to like my choice of music, including any of my loudest classical works such as Stravinsky's "Rite of Spring" or Copland's "Fanfare For The Common Man." It is regrettable that the mindless ones of Generation X were not told by their parents, peers or teachers about manners, respect for others, etc., not to mention originality. Do these airheads really think they are all being individuals "sharing" this chain saw music with the rest of us?
Thank you, thank you, Judge Kaylor and The Ledger for making my day. If only our local ordinances were enforced or even known about by people who are constantly annoyed by this roadside racket, perhaps there could be some control. A good start might be enforcement by our police departments when they encounter these mobile noisemakers.
THOMAS S. PLETCHER
Winter Haven
Congratulations to Judge Anne Kaylor for her creative sentencing of noise offenders. While I doubt they will come to appreciate Vivaldi's music, it is time they learned their raucous blasts can be disruptive and offensive to others. They need to learn some respect. Fines or jail won't do it.
ALBERT ESKENAZI
Lakeland"
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Part A; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Hugo Martin and Matea Gold
DATELINE: Commerce, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that rail traffic between Los Angeles and Long Beach, California has increased 56 percent in the last ten years. Residents of cities along the way are forced to deal with the noise, pollution, and safety issues that result. Rail officials say they are working on some of the problems, but also say that residents should expect some noise and pollution when living near a rail yard.
The article reports that rail traffic between Los Angeles and Long Beach, California has increased 56 percent in the last ten years. Residents of cities along the way are forced to deal with the noise, pollution, and safety issues that result. Many that moved in years ago say the noise used to be bearable, but has become a major problem.
The article notes that trains also carry heavier loads than they used to: 40-foot containers stacked atop each other, that are loudly removed with cranes onto outgoing trains or trucks. Train whistles, sometimes used playfully, improperly, or excessively, have also become a nuisance.
The article goes on to say that workers on their way to work and children on their way to school have been seen climbing between cars on a stopped train to avoid being late. Also, emergency vehicles may have difficulty getting to a call because a train may be blocking a roadway for as long as 40 minutes. Vernon sued Burlington Northern in court for exceeding the 10 minute maximum allowed for blocking a roadway, and received $1000 for each violation. Rail companies blame passing trains and mechanical problems for causing such delays, and say they are working to reduce those blockages.
The article talks about regional pollution from trains, which includes a half-ton of carcinogenic diesel fumes each day that can cause respiratory problems and nose bleeds. The Air Quality Management District sued Union Pacific over the health problems recently, but a court decision is still pending.
The article also says that less-used railroad lines attract those who dump garbage illegally, or who engage in criminal activities.
The article notes that state and local officials are pushing rail companies to mitigate the problems, and are encouraging the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to investigate the problems. Last year, one company in Commerce transferred train-to-truck transfers to another station where noise wasn't as much of an issue.
The article goes on to say that the Alameda high-speed rail corridor to be completed in 2002 will eliminate traffic congestion through the use of underpasses and should replace four current train lines. Officials say that while this project will help, it will certainly not solve the problem. By 2020, the 30 trains that now travel the stretch each day will become 100 trains. Pollution and noise problems will also become more concentrated on neighbors of the new line.
The article says that the railroads defend their business, saying that emissions, costs, and safety hazards are all relatively low compared to a trucking solution. They say that increased safety measures such as newer signals have caused a drop in train accidents to 44 per year from 55 in 1989. They also say that trucking businesses who take materials from rail yards to end users have enjoyed up to a 30 percent increase in business in recent years. They also say that residents should have expected noise and pollution when they moved near a rail yard.
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. A14
BYLINE: Jack E. Coulter
DATELINE: High Point, North Carolina
The News and Record prints a letter to the editor that praises a recent series of articles on the planned FedEx airport hub in Greensboro, North Carolina. The letter also asks for clarification of a noise contour, including how it is determined.
"I read all the articles written by Taft Wireback on the FedEx project (Nov. 7, 8), and I have one criticism. But more importantly I want to say "Thank you" to Wireback and to the newspaper. I have been distantly interested in the project but not very well informed. Wireback fixed that with a great series of articles.
The criticism: Noise contour was not defined. I know what one is but not how this one is determined. Please do a follow-up telling your readers what this contour is and how it is defined. If you use decibels as part of the definition, please equate the contour to everyday noises. I think it will be particularly important to know if the noise contour we are interested in is a peak or an average over time or a combination.
The editorial on FedEx (Nov. 7) was an excellent piece. Now please tell your readers what you are going to do to see that "conservative calculations" are used and how the citizenry can help see that noneconomic considerations get the hearing they should have. If the noise calculations are skewed in favor of the project, the costs - economic and quality of living -will grow at a very rapid rate because the cone approaches a dense residential area. Well done."
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Triad/State, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Charles Frago
DATELINE: Randleman, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that the Randleman, North Carolina Aldermen have promised to rent a small trailer to block disturbing noise coming from a wastewater treatment plant until more permanent solutions -- quieter blowers -- are installed.
The article reports that the Randleman, North Carolina Aldermen have promised to rent a small trailer to block disturbing noise coming from a wastewater treatment plant until a more permanent solution is completed. A resident had asked for a wall to be built, but the aldermen believe that renting a small trailer for $55 each month until spring -- when noisy oil blowers will be replaced with quieter ones -- will be cheaper than a permanent wall.
The article notes that the resident claimed the noise from the plant, which he hears constantly, reaches 55 decibels but the mayor pointed out that most of the data he had collected showed noise in the low 40s. The mayor also said that the resident should have expected noise when he moved in near it.
PUBLICATION: The Press Enterprise
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B05
BYLINE: Imran Ghori
DATELINE: Highland, California
The Press-Enterprise reports that a new ordinance in Highland, California will allow police to bill hosts of loud parties if police must come to the same location within a twelve-hour period because of noise complaints.
The article reports that a new ordinance in Highland, California will allow police to bill hosts of loud parties if police must come to the same location within a twelve-hour period because of noise complaints. The ordinance originally levied a $100 fine, but an amendment allowed police to bill for the actual costs of police time, which would vary from call to call depending on the number of officers and the length of time spent at the call.
The article notes that the city is not trying to make money with the ordinance, but is trying to reduce the 1,000 or so noise complaints that police receive each year. Redlands, California already has a similar ordinance.
PUBLICATION: Star Tribune
DATE: November 10, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 2B
DATELINE: Minneapolis, Minnesota
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: R.T. Rybak, spokesman for Residents Opposed to Airport Racket (ROAR)
The Star Tribune reports that the anti-noise group Residents Opposed to Airport Racket (ROAR) have criticized a recent decision by Minneapolis' mayor to appoint a Northwest Airlines official to the city planning commission. The official, has background in "planning,... economic development and planning issues,", but noise activists say her "expertise [shouldn't] be turned against citizens affected by airport noise."
The article reports that the anti-noise group Residents Opposed to Airport Racket (ROAR) have criticized a recent decision by Minneapolis' mayor to appoint a Northwest Airlines official to the city planning commission. The official, has background in "planning,... economic development and planning issues" from a five-year stint as a mayor's advisor.
The article notes that the official will fill one of five positions that the mayor is allowed to appoint for the council; while four positions require council approval, the fifth does not. The new officials says she will abstain from any decision regarding Northwest airlines, but noise activists say "City Hall shouldn't allow that expertise [gained in working for Northwest Airlines] to be turned against citizens affected by airport noise."
PUBLICATION: Central Maine Morning Sentinel
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Betty Jespersen
DATELINE: Fairbanks, Maine
The Central Maine Morning Sentinel reports that residents are opposed to proposed expansion at a Fairbanks, Maine log yard, worrying about noise, pollution, and dust from an expanded site. The log yard owner has said he would quiet his equipment, limit operating hours, plant ten-foot trees as a buffer and cut down on dust. The planning board will decide on the request after a public hearing and a walk through of the site.
The article reports that residents are opposed to proposed expansion at a Fairbanks, Maine log yard. The expansion would allow log unloading, sorting, and reloading, and would double the size of the three-acre site. An expansion proposed several years ago at a bark-chipping plant was discouraged by resident opposition.
The article notes that the log yard owner has said he would quiet his equipment, limit operating hours to between 6 a.m. and 5 p.m., and wait to slash logs until 6:30 a.m. He would also plant ten-foot trees as a buffer zone and spread calcium chloride to cut down on dust.
The article goes on to say that residents worry that dust, noise, and pollution would worsen if the expansion goes forward. The planning board will walk through the site with the owner, and will talk about the issue with residents at a planned public hearing.
PUBLICATION: Denver Rocky Mountain News
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Local; Ed. Final; Pg. 23A
BYLINE: Charley Able
DATELINE: Jefferson County, Colorado
The Denver Rocky Mountain News reports that the last public hearing on a proposed quarry near Jefferson County, Colorado's Eldorado State Park will be held soon. The county staff's report sides with residents and state legislators in opposing the project based on possible noise problems.
The article reports that the last public hearing on a proposed quarry near Jefferson County, Colorado's Eldorado State Park will be held soon. The quarry would remove 1.5 million tons of rock every year, and residents worry that dust and noise from the quarry could spoil the park that is visited by more than 250,000 annually.
The article notes that the rock would be hauled out by train.
The article goes on to say that the planning commission recommended approval of the proposal in a 4-3 vote, but the county staff report opposed the project because of possible noise problems. Also, 400 residents attended the first public hearing, and state officials have come out against the proposal. Besides noise and dust, residents worry about property values and wells.
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Environment: Noise, Pg.05
DATELINE: Ockbrook and Borrowash, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that a resident near Ockbrook and Borrowash, U.K. has gathered 500 signatures and the support of the parish council in calling for noise control along the A52.
The article reports that a resident near Ockbrook and Borrowash, U.K. has gathered 500 signatures and the support of the parish council in calling for noise control along the A52. Measures could include a quieter surface, speed limits, noise walls, and landscaping.
PUBLICATION: The Nelson Mail
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 10
BYLINE: Neal Tracy
DATELINE: Nelson, New Zealand
The Nelson Mail reports that "The Artery", a community arts center in Nelson, New Zealand claims that it is being singled out in disputes over noise pollution. Artery officials say that the complaints are prejudicial because the music in question is techno music. Officials have spent $145,000 to soundproof the building to be under 45 decibels, but the city is now lowering the noise limits to 40 decibels because the bass notes are still disturbing residents.
The article reports that "The Artery", a community arts center in Nelson, New Zealand claims that it is being singled out in disputes over noise pollution. Officials have spent $145,000 to soundproof the building to be under 45 decibels, but the city is now lowering the noise limits to 40 decibels.
The article notes that the limit is being lowered because bass -- which is not well-muffled by soundproofing -- is still too loud. Artery officials say that the complaints are prejudicial because the music in question is techno music; they say that some complaints have been received when no music was playing at all. They also claimed that noise officers have not advised them how loud they are when cited with violations.
The article goes on to say that Artery officials are looking into whether other clubs in the region are held to the same standards, and threaten to take the city to the Human Rights Commission if necessary.
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A1
BYLINE: Melissa Midgett and Paul Muschick
DATELINE: High Point, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that some residents around Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport are worried that a planned FedEx hub -- of the type that destroyed long-present neighborhoods in Indianapolis -- may threaten neighborhoods here. While some residents worry about noise, others worry a housing shortage could result from recent decisions that zone noisy land as incompatible with residences.
The article reports that some residents around Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport are worried that a planned FedEx hub -- of the type that destroyed long-present neighborhoods in Indianapolis -- may threaten neighborhoods here. As part of the hub plan, scheduled for 2005 completion, some houses will be torn down. The FAA is currently conducting an environmental study that will determine which neighborhoods will be affected.
The article notes that many residents, however say things like "Sometimes they are so loud in the morning, but then it's over. Who cares? You get used to it." A woman who used to live near Chicago O'Hare's Airport says she thinks any noise will pale in comparison to what she used to experience.
The article goes on to say that there could be a housing shortage as the airport expands to block new home construction, and substantial industrial zoning south of High Point pushes the housing market north.
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Triad/State, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Alex Wayne
DATELINE: High Point, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that High Point, North Carolina officials support the planned FedEx hub at Piedmont Triad International Airport. They say that comparisons of noise with a similar hub in Indianapolis is unfair, although they say that economic benefits will be present as they are in Indianapolis.
The article reports that High Point, North Carolina officials support the planned FedEx hub at Piedmont Triad International Airport. They say that comparisons of noise with a similar hub in Indianapolis is unfair, although they say that economic benefits will be present as they are in Indianapolis; they have brought officials from Indianapolis to town twice this year to promote the economic benefits of the hub.
The article notes that although officials are quick to point out economic benefits, they say that noise problems will not be as great as they are in Indianapolis where homes up to five miles from the airport are in a high-noise cone. High Point officials claim that the noise cone there will only be 3.5 miles long, and will affect fewer residents; they say that High Point will see only half the commercial flights that Indianapolis does.
The article says that nevertheless, the zoning commission changed its land use plan to allow residential development on only 30 percent of developable land near the airport, as opposed to an originally proposed 78 percent. Also, some of that land may become industrial instead of residential. The amount of land available for residential zones will be altered if the noise cone is larger than expected.
The article goes on to say that one council member opposes the hub, saying that steeper take-offs and other noise mitigation will be needed, and economic development is understated. He says that although residents in the northern region around the airport have been most vocal in complaining, other residents will begin hearing problems once the hub is operational.
The article notes that city council members are waiting to read the FAA's environmental impact report on the proposal.
PUBLICATION: The Salt Lake Tribune
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Final; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Skip Knowles
DATELINE: Salt Lake City, Utah
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that a shooting range near Salt Lake City, Utah will be closed down within a year or two. Noise complaints have been a problem, but the reasons behind the decision seem to be strictly financial. The planning commission had tried several years ago to close the noisy range, but the state legislature passed a bill preventing noisy establishments from being shut down by complainants who knew the noise was there when they moved.
The article reports that a shooting range near Salt Lake City, Utah will be closed down within a year or two. The land owner plans to lease the land to a gravel mining company, and then to a housing developer. Noise complaints are present, but the reasons behind the decision seem to be strictly financial.
The article notes that housing developments have been steadily increasing around the shooting range, and the planning commission had tried several years ago to close it down because of resident complaints. Before it could, the state legislature passed a bill preventing noisy establishments from being shut down by complainants who knew the noise was there when they moved.
The article goes on to say that the range is used free of charge by local police, and proceeds from the range benefit the local Lion's Club: the current lessor. Range officials insist that shooting ranges are a major resource for the community and are important for teaching safe shooting. They also point to the camaraderie that will be lost when friends and families can no longer meet at the site.
The article also says that the range, ironically, is used as a range for mule deer. They "cross the range in the middle of rifle practices from December through March, take the grounds over every night and even stand down range of the skeet and trap areas, shaking off falling bird shot like flies in the summer."
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 9, 1999
SECTION: Citrus TIMES; Letters; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Lionel B. Martin, Gowanbank
DATELINE: Inverness, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times prints a letter to the editor from a U.K. man -- visiting Inverness, Florida -- who says that the loud speedway in the area should be moved away from residential areas.
"Editor: My wife and I have not long returned home from another visit to my cousin and his wife, who live at Royal Oaks in Inverness: always pleasant people and a pleasant place to visit. I have often thought that if I could afford the bills for medical care, I would consider moving there to live out the remainder of my life.
However, Thursday and Saturday late afternoon and evenings are spoiled by the extremely loud, unpleasant and disturbing noises made by the vehicles using the nearby speedway track, and by the announcers of the races.
In our enlightened age, noise is recognized as being harmful to the hearing and unsettling to the equilibrium and the sanity of normal human beings, and whilst I would not suggest that the enjoyment of those who like noise should be denied them, I would suggest that in a country where open spaces abound, somewhere could be found, far removed from any residential area, where noise could be made without imposing it upon others.
Can anything be done for people who have neither the power, the money, the political clout, nor any of the other influences that would ensure that action would be taken to relocate the Inverness Speedway to outside the hearing distance of residential areas?"
PUBLICATION: Birmingham Post
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 8
DATELINE: United Kingdom
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: HACAN ClearSkies chairman Mr John Stewart; Mr Jim Bailey, director of Strategic Aviation Special Interest Group
The Birmingham Post reports that anti-noise groups in the U.K. are questioning the validity of an aviation-sponsored report on the financial aspects of the aviation industry to the U.K. economy. An anti-noise group says that "The airline sector only accounts for 0.8 per cent of UK gross domestic output."
The article reports that anti-noise groups in the U.K. are questioning the validity of an aviation-sponsored report on the financial aspects of the aviation industry to the U.K. economy. The study will be used to help determine future aviation policy, and anti-noise groups say that an impartial review is required. They especially note that environmental considerations must be included.
The article notes that the anti-noise group HACAN ClearSkies disagrees with the expected "results" of the study, that will likely reflect positively on aviation. They say that "The airline sector only accounts for 0.8 per cent of UK gross domestic output - about the same as estate agents or sanitary services."
PUBLICATION: Central Maine Morning Sentinel
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Betty Jespersen
DATELINE: Farmington, Maine
The Central Maine Morning Sentinel reports that International Paper officials will meet with the Farmington, Maine Planning Board on Monday to discuss a proposed log-yard expansion. The company must defend its noise reduction strategies to have any chance of getting the project approved.
The article reports that International Paper officials will meet with the Farmington, Maine Planning Board on Monday to discuss noise reduction at the company's log yard. The company wants to double the three-acre size of the yard to allow for the stacking, sorting, and storage of logs. The company currently processes 40,000 feet of tree-logs annually.
The article notes that residents have opposed the expansion on the basis of noise, saying that the additional "slasher" will increase noise at the site. Operating hours are to be from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m., but neighbors say that work sometimes starts earlier. The company must defend its noise reduction strategies to have any chance of getting the project approved.
PUBLICATION: Coventry Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 7
BYLINE: Rebecca Keay
DATELINE: Warwick, United Kingdom
The Coventry Evening Telegraph reports that a shooting range in Warwick, U.K. will finally get to appeal a noise abatement notice in court this coming February.
The article reports that a shooting range in Warwick, U.K. will finally get to oppose a noise abatement notice in court this coming February. The notice -- which asks the range to limit shooting to only a few days a week -- was prompted by noise complaints from residential neighbors. The court appeal was granted in the form of of a three-day trial.
PUBLICATION: The Deseret News
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: Wire; Pg. A01
BYLINE: by Lynn Aravedeseret
DATELINE: Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret News reports that a light rail system planned for the Wasatch Front, near Salt Lake City, Utah, will be relatively quiet. The whistle will be much quieter than freight train whistles, and will be used sparingly.
The article reports that a light rail system planned for the Wasatch Front, near Salt Lake City, Utah, will be relatively quiet. The local ordinance restricts noise to 55-decibels, but train whistles are regulated by federal law.
The article notes that there will be two noise-producing safety devices on the light rail trains: a standard whistle and a 'gong.' The gong is more like a bell, and will be used mainly to warn passengers of impending train movement. The whistle will be much quieter than freight train whistles, and will be used sparingly at times such as when a jaywalker is in the path of a train. Also, the general operating noise of the train should be less than a tractor-trailer.
The article goes on to say that the trains will operate between 5:30 a.m. and midnight daily. Whistles are required to be blown in a certain pattern before road crossings: two long blasts, one short, one long. Even neighbors admit that newcomers find whistles more disturbing, and that one does get used to them.
PUBLICATION: Engineering News-Record
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: News Site; Vol. 243, No. 19; Pg. 12
BYLINE: Richard Korman
DATELINE: United States
The Engineering News-Record reports that federal health officials are going to revisit the possibility of instituting a tougher workplace noise standard for construction work. The Associated General Contractors say although noise standards are tougher in Europe, OSHA should concentrate on injury regulations first.
The article reports that federal health officials are going to revisit the possibility of instituting a tougher workplace noise standard for construction work. While noise has been reduced by equipment manufacturers and hearing protection improvements, officials say employers and government officials need to make more of a commitment.
The article notes that "construction noise rules have general requirements for a hearing conservation program," but are never enforced. 18,000 construction inspections resulted in only 79 citations in 1998. Also, limits here are 90 decibels each day, while they are 85 decibels each day in Europe.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: Pg.1
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that not all homeowners who live near the new A30 in Exeter, U.K. will be entitled to compensation for lost property value due to the road. Property value losses from noise and light will be compensated, but losses due to affected views will not.
The article reports that not all homeowners who live near the new A30 in Exeter, U.K. will be entitled to compensation for lost property value due to the road. The Land Compensation Act requires the Highways Agency to reimburse homeowners for property value losses caused by noise or lights. Property value losses caused by the loss of view or convenience will not be considered.
The article notes that claims must be instigated at least a year after the road opened and before six years pass.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Jean O. Pasco
DATELINE: Orange County, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that cities near the proposed El Toro Airport in Orange County, California are encouraging residential and school development near the site. Officials hope that by allowing noise-sensitive developments to move near the airport, the airport project will be more likely to be abandoned due to concerns over noise. Some disagree, saying that building schools is "a tacit acknowledgment that the noise won't be that bad."
The article reports that cities near the proposed El Toro Airport in Orange County, California are encouraging residential and school development near the site. Officials hope that by allowing noise-sensitive developments to move near the airport, the airport project will be more likely to be abandoned due to concerns over noise. Irvine rezoned a current business park for residences and schools. The county wants the areas to remain residence free to allow for a smooth airport approval.
The article notes that some communities, like Lake Forest, have not gone quiet so far. They have sent three development proposals to the county commission for a chance at a case-by-case waiver, instead of denying them outright based on the city's current restrictions on areas affected by jet noise. One councilman said the compromise is being made to protect the city from angry residents that might become upset about jet noise and blame the city.
The article goes on to say that the county may have reason to grant many of these waivers, because several development restrictions have already been challenged on the basis that the military flights that made them necessary no longer apply. These challenges could turn into expensive court problems for the county.
The article also notes that several school districts plan to build schools in proposed flight paths. They acknowledge that any airport activity would cause problems for students. While some say that this will result in increased pressure for rejection of the airport, others say that building schools is "a tacit acknowledgment that the noise won't be that bad."
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A5
BYLINE: Taft Wireback
DATELINE: Plainfield, Indiana
The News and Record reports that neighborhoods surrounding Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, North Carolina may share a fate that has befallen neighborhoods around Indianapolis International Airport: soundproofing or demolition. The Airport owner pays all of the expenses associated with these projects to comply with federal law.
The article reports that neighborhoods surrounding Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, North Carolina may share a fate that has befallen neighborhoods around Indianapolis International Airport. Around that airport, which has a FedEx hub similar to the one proposed in Greensboro, neighborhoods are being soundproofed or demolished.
The article discusses the "topsy-turvy" economics that allow demolition and soundproofing companies to make substantial profit off of these neighborhoods, deemed to loud for habitation. Many of the building supplies from the typical home can be salvaged and resold; in some cases a whole house can be moved and resold. As for soundproofing, new windows, doors, ventilation and heating systems can cost up to $30,000 per house. The Airport owner pays all of these expenses to rid itself of future lawsuits and comply with federal law.
PUBLICATION: News and Record
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A5
BYLINE: Taft Wireback
DATELINE: Plainfield, Indiana
The News and Record reports that when Plainfield, Indiana began losing property taxes because Indianapolis International Airport was buying land in the area, they began offering incentives to businesses. Greensboro, North Carolina is looking at Plainfield's model, since a proposed FedEx Hub at Greensboro's Piedmont Triad International Airport is similar to Indianapolis' airport growth.
The article reports that when Plainfield, Indiana began losing property taxes because Indianapolis International Airport was buying land in the area, they began offering incentives to businesses. Businesses receive property tax breaks for ten years, but the city still receives more property taxes than it would if the land had remained agricultural or residential. Airport property is exempt from property taxes because it is owned by a governmental agency.
The article notes that Greensboro, North Carolina is looking at Plainfield's model, since a proposed FedEx Hub at Greensboro's Piedmont Triad International Airport is similar to Indianapolis' airport growth. Plainfield has attracted $300-million in new industry construction, and property taxes collected have increased from $63-million to $250-million, and that number will increase as incentives are reduced. The city also extended water and sewer services to the newly developed areas, and officials say that quality residential development is increasing as well.
PUBLICATION: PR Newswire
DATE: November 8, 1999
SECTION: Financial News
DATELINE: Arlington, Virginia
PR Newswire reports that US Airways new Airbus A320s has a 75-decibel noise footprint, making it affect ten times less area with noise than the Boeing 727 it replaces.
The article reports that US Airways has introduced the Airbus A320 on Boston to New York shuttle flights. The aircraft has a 75-decibel noise footprint, making it affect ten times less area with noise than the Boeing 727 it replaces. Also, the aircraft require 40 percent less fuel, resulting in savings of a million gallons per aircraft each year.
PUBLICATION: The Boston Globe
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: West Weekly; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Alan Lupo
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Anna Winter, Save Our Heritage activist; Anastasia Lyman, Communities Against Runway Expansion;
The Boston Globe reports that residents surrounding Hanscom Field and those surrounding Logan Airport met to discuss possible common ground against a common enemy: Massachusetts' Port Authority (Massport). Massport is proposing an additional runway at Logan, and has added commercial flights at Hanscom without much of a public input process.
The article reports that residents surrounding Hanscom Field and those surrounding Logan Airport met to discuss possible common ground against a common enemy: Massachusetts' Port Authority (Massport). Massport is proposing an additional runway at Logan, and has added commercial flights at Hanscom without much of a public input process.
The article notes that the two neighborhoods have traditionally been enemies; Logan in particular has always seen Hanscom as an airport that should be sharing more of the region's air traffic and the accompanying noise and pollution. The meeting involved little discussion except an agreement that cooperation in the future against Massport could benefit both parties, and a promise to report back to their organizations. Also, Hanscom representatives pledged their opposition to the new runway at Logan.
The article goes on to say that the proposed Logan runway is touted by Massport as a solution to spreading noise and pollution more evenly over Boston. Critics say any even distribution would only be a temporary fix, as the new runway would allow more flights to be added and worsen the situation. Logan-area residents want the FAA to create a regional New England group to formulate long-term air traffic plans.
The article mentions that Hanscom residents oppose commercial flights largely on the basis of the historical value of their community. They have sued Massport for failing to involve the public in the decision to add commercial flights.
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: Opinion; Pg. B10
BYLINE: Dave Sarchet
DATELINE: Camas, Oregon
The Columbian prints several letters to the editor, one of which criticized residents near Portland International Airport for moving near to noise and then complaining about it.
"Don't move next to noise
Bravo to the Oregon Air National Guard spokeswoman quoted in the Oct. 31 article, "Is life under the flight path too loud?" who said, "The people at Columbia Shores moved next to us; we didn't move next to them."
It amazes me how many people can invest huge amounts of money moving into an area and then complain about something that was there for years.
In the past year I have read articles about people moving into the Lacamas Lake area and then complaining about the use of personal water craft on the lake. People move into the Fisher's Landing area and complain about the traffic. Now people who are buying $400,000 condos across the river from an airport that has been there for years are complaining about the noise of planes.
Before buying one of these high-priced condos, people should have considered the proximity to Portland International Airport, that there is also an air guard base, and that planes being planes, they make noise.
From my home I see many planes as they take off or approach PDX. Many times I take time to stop and watch the F-15s take off, climbing east and banking to head west. Flying that plane must be a thrill.
Not often enough do I give thought to the commitment that the individuals of the air guard make for all of us. Our neighbors or coworkers who are a part of the guard are becoming a more and more important part of this country's military. They deploy around the world to support the Air Force, usually with little publicity.
As for the additional noise of an F-15, it's simply the sound of freedom.
Those of us who have lived here all our lives don't appreciate the whining. We've had to watch some of these eyesores being built."
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: At Home; Pg. F1
BYLINE: Anne Hart
DATELINE: Washougal, Washington
The Columbian reports that homes with walls made of styrofoam and concrete are gaining popularity. The R-value -- or temperature/noise insulation value -- can reach R-56, as opposed to the average wood wall's R-20. Costs that can be 5% to 10% higher up front, although utility bills can run as low as $100/month for a 6,000 square foot home.
The article reports that homes with walls made of styrofoam and concrete are gaining popularity. The process has been called "insulated concrete form (ICF), cast-in-place foundation systems, insulating foundation forms and foam forms." "Concrete is poured inside seven-pound foam blocks that double as insulation and formwork. The polystyrene forms are linked by polypropylene webs to create stackable units, into which concrete is poured. Steel reinforcement bars, or rebar, buttress the concrete."
The article notes that the R-value -- or insulation value -- can reach R-56, as opposed to the average wood wall's R-20. Custom home builders are more likely to use the technique than developers who build dozens of houses each year. This is mainly due to costs that can be 5% to 10% higher up front, although utility bills can run as low as $100/month for a 6,000 square foot home.
The article goes on to say that the homes are also more fire, earthquake, and pest resistant.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N1
BYLINE: Michael Coit
DATELINE: Sun Valley, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that two churches in a Sun Valley neighborhood has become an increasing irritant to residents. Over the last two years forty complaints have been made, and the churches have taken some measures to reduce the noise. Although the local noise ordinance was amended to include churches, little can be done without restricting times of services,:a move that would be construed as a limit on religious freedom.
The article reports that two churches in a Sun Valley neighborhood has become an increasing irritant to residents. The Methodist churches hold music-filled services with amplified sermons that disturb residents. Over the last two years forty complaints have been made, and the churches have taken some measures to reduce the noise.
The article notes that although the local noise ordinance was amended to include churches two years ago, little can be done because the churches have done the best they can without restricting times of services, which would be construed as a limit on religious freedom. Neighbors believe that regardless of religious freedom, the churches are being disrespectful neighbors.
The article goes on to say that some church officials claim that neighbors dislike the race of the churchgoers, but neighbors say it is their noise that they don't like.
PUBLICATION: The New York Times
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: Section 14Nj; Page 6; Column 1; New Jersey Weekly Desk
BYLINE: Karen Demasters
DATELINE: Newark, New Jersey
The New York Times reports that alternative flight paths that were tested at Newark International Airport in New Jersey last year did not reduce noise.
The article reports that alternative flight paths that were tested at Newark International Airport in New Jersey last year did not reduce noise. The flight paths were directed over an industrial area, and were designed to reduce noise complaints from residents. The FAA said after analyzing the data that noise was not reduced. The data included about 200 of 750 flights a day for six months.
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A9
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News and Record notes that Greensboro's Piedmont Triad International Airport will soon be home to a FedEx cargo hub -- just as Indianapolis International is -- but differences in size of the airport and use of the hub mean that noise problems may be different. The article compares many aspects of the two airports directly.
The article compares vital statistics of Indianapolis International Airport and Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport. Greensboro will soon be home to a FedEx cargo hub -- just as Indianapolis is -- but differences in size of the airport and use of the hub mean that noise problems may be different.
The article notes that Indianapolis has three methods for dealing with noise problems, for which it has budgeted $65-million over the next five years. Houses affected by unacceptable levels of noise will be purchased and demolished if the homeowner decides to move, and the homeowner will be compensated for moving costs as well. House affected by lower levels of noise that can be blocked with better insulation are soundproofed or bought from homeowners; purchased homes are resold to new owners who sign an acknowledgement of airport noise in the area. Homeowners affected by even less noise may be eligible for a program which pays up to 10 percent over the price that a home sells for, making up for value loss due to airport noise.
The article goes on to say that Indianapolis' airport sees triple the commercial flights as Greensboro at 284, and has a budget ($662-billion) and landholdings (7,700 acres) that are twice as big. It has three runways, and the FedEx sorting facility employs 3,000 in its 1.9-million square foot building. 51 flights occur every weekday morning.
The article notes that Greensboro sees 92 commercial flights each day, and has a $24.4-million budget. The proposed FedEx hub will add a third runway, and will have a 1-million square-foot sorting facility employing 1,600 part-time workers. FedEx flights would reach 60 each day, and the hub would be used for more regional sorting than its Indianapolis counterpart.
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A10
BYLINE: Taft Wireback
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that the configuration of the impending FedEx hub at Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport means that flight patterns will be similar to those at Indianapolis International Airport.
The article reports that the configuration of the impending FedEx hub at Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport means that flight patterns will be similar to those at Indianapolis International Airport. Wind patterns will force takeoffs to the north about once a month, but most nights will see takeoffs to the south. Despite this similarity, neighborhoods in the two cities are different and thus the flight patterns may affect them differently.
The article notes that in Indianapolis, communities north of the airport are very urban, and are used to industrial, traffic, and airport noise. They say that the noise hardly ever disturbs them, and most say they don't notice the occasional northbound overflights. Residents north of Greensboro live in a more suburban setting, and tend to be wealthier; this may affect their tolerance for noise even on an occasional basis. Airport officials in Greensboro have continually pointed out that "the project's greatest critics likely would hear the least noise from the proposed air-cargo operation."
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A1
BYLINE: Taft Wireback
DATELINE: Plainfield, Indiana
The News and Record reports that neighborhoods south of Indianapolis International Airport are being slowly dismantled as the airport buys out houses impacted by jet noise. Greensboro, North Carolina residents fear that a FedEx hub at Piedmont Triad International Airport -- which would make Piedmont very similar to Indianapolis -- could cause similar problems to the south. Most flights would be routed south at Piedmont due to wind patterns, just as they are in Indianapolis, which would protect the most vocal opponents of the new hub: upscale suburban homeowners north of the airport.
The article reports that neighborhoods south of Indianapolis International Airport are being slowly dismantled as the airport buys out houses impacted by jet noise. In twelve years, three noise studies there have each extended the noise impact area further south. Greensboro, North Carolina residents fear that a FedEx hub at Piedmont Triad International Airport -- which would make Piedmont very similar to Indianapolis -- could cause similar problems to the south.
The article notes that although Greensboro's noise study is still in process, residents worry that similar noise impact areas will destroy residential areas: especially to the south. The airports share similar wind patterns and runway orientations, although Piedmont has a smaller size and budget. Greensboro officials have pointed to economic development in Indianapolis as a result of the hub, has attracted "new companies in industries ranging from computers to wireless telephones and pharmaceuticals,... and has added hundreds of jobs" in the area.
The article notes that most flights would be routed south at Piedmont due to wind patterns, just as they are in Indianapolis, which would protect the most vocal opponents of the new hub: upscale suburban homeowners north of the airport.
The article goes on to say that "despite Indianapolis International's generally good reputation [of buying or insulating noisy homes] and FedEx's cooperative attitude, the Indy airport still has faced angry criticism and noise -related lawsuits filed by some of its neighbors." A ten percent premium on house prices is believed by some neighbors to be lower than the actual loss in value that jet noise causes.
The article concludes by saying that Piedmont officials are unsure if they will join the FAA's voluntary "Part 150" program, which outlines steps for noise mitigation including home buyouts and noise insulation. If it joined, the airport would re-evaluate the noise situation every five years for changes caused by increasing flights and other changes.
PUBLICATION: The News and Record
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: General News, Pg. A10
BYLINE: Taft Wireback
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News and Record reports that the proposed FedEx Hub at Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport may cause noise problems that extend further than is currently estimated. Noise problems at a similar hub in Indianapolis -- which have been growing over the last twelve years -- extend as far as five and one-half miles, while Piedmont has only estimated noise problems up to three miles away.
The article reports that the proposed FedEx Hub at Greensboro, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad International Airport may cause noise problems that extend further than is currently estimated. This article duplicates information that is summarized in other articles from this same day and paper, but notes more details about the possibility of under-estimated noise contours.
The article notes that while Indianapolis International Airport, which has a similar FedEx hub, owns four miles of land past the south end of its runways, while Piedmont owns only one-half mile. Also, noise problems -- which have been growing over the last twelve years -- extend as far as five and one-half miles from Indianapolis; in contrast, Piedmont has only estimated noise problems up to three miles away.
PUBLICATION: Portland Press Herald
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: Maine/New England, Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Andrew Garber
DATELINE: United States
The Portland Press Herald reports that open-plan schools -- which have few walls -- foster cooperation among teachers, but most teachers and architects don't like them because noise becomes too disruptive.
The article reports that open-plan schools -- which were very popular in the 70s -- have fostered an atmosphere of cooperation among teachers and festiveness in students. Unfortunately, open-plans -- which include few walls -- that allow people and lines of sight to be less constrained, also allow noise to flow freely. This can make it hard to do quiet activities. Architects and teachers overwhelmingly oppose open-plans these days.
PUBLICATION: The Sunday Herald
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 5
BYLINE: Eddie Gibb
DATELINE: Scotland
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Mary Stevens, of the National Society for Clean Air
The Sunday Herald reports that the new UK Soundscape Community wants to create a society of more active listeners, saying that more active listeners will recognize Muzak and related sounds as intrusive noise.
The article reports that the UK Soundscape Community (UKSC) has been formed as part of the anti-noise group National Society for Clean Air. The UKSC wants to create a society of more active listeners, saying that more active listeners will recognize Muzak and related sounds as intrusive noise. They will be having their first meeting at a musical event in Glasgow this month.
The article notes that the question of what noise is intrusive is important after last month's murder of a man motivated by a noisy washing machine. Noise complaints are growing as stereos and TVs become louder, more appliances are used in the homes, and traffic increases.
The article notes that while "it is probably too simplistic to say in itself a noisy environment causes stress,... its undoubtedly true that intrusive noise [which can be defined differently from person to person] can be stressful."
PUBLICATION: The Chicago Tribune
DATE: November 7, 1999
SECTION: Real Estate; Pg. 7G; Zone: C
BYLINE: Denise Linke
DATELINE: Bensenville, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that a U.S. District Court approved a settlement in an airport noise suit between Bensenville, Illinois and Chicago. Chicago originally rejected Bensenville's list of homes to be soundproofed, and replaced it with their own list. The settlement allows Bensenville to select the homes.
The article notes that Bensenville selected homes that were closest to the airport, while Chicago said homes further away actually received more airport noise. Bensenville officials claimed that Chicago simply didn't want to put any money into homes closest to the airport, since it plans to eventually buy those homes and demolish them.
The article goes on to say that soundproofing will be delayed until spring due to the settlement, but Bensenville officials say that is better than never getting relief for their residents. Airport officials say the latest noise study, due out in the spring, will reveal that all homes in 70 decibel areas have now been soundproofed.
Previous week: October 31, 1999
Next week: November 14, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index