PUBLICATION: Birmingham Evening Mail
DATE: November 27, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 8
BYLINE: Sue Smith
DATELINE: Birmingham, United Kingdom
The Birmingham Evening Mail reports that about a dozen activists in Birmingham, U.K. trucked a large sound system to the house of the Birmingham Airport Manager and blasted the house with noise. Protesters hoped that the manager would take better note of widespread resident concern over noise.
The article reports that about a dozen activists in Birmingham, U.K. trucked a large sound system to the house of the Birmingham Airport Manager and blasted the house with noise. The display was meant to protest the recently approved doubling of Birmingham Airport's capacity.
The article notes that six of the activists were dressed like airport marshals. Although no one appeared to be home at the house, neighbors were bothered by the noise and came out to see what was going on. Protesters hoped that the manager would take better note of widespread resident concern over noise.
PUBLICATION: Bristol Evening Post
DATE: November 27, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.13
BYLINE: Roger Burton
DATELINE: Bishopston, United Kingdom
The Bristol Evening Post reports that the owner of a pizza restaurant in Bishopston, U.K. was fined 200 pounds for failing to repair a noisy exhaust system in accordance with a noise abatement order.
The article reports that the owner of a pizza restaurant in Bishopston, U.K. was fined 200 pounds for failing to repair a noisy exhaust system in accordance with a noise abatement order. The order had given him 90 days to fix the noisy system, and he admitted that he had failed because"specialists... had got it wrong the first time but later they had put the work right."
The article notes that the maximum fine could have been up to 20,000 pounds.
PUBLICATION: The Nelson Mail
DATE: November 27, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Collett Geoff
DATELINE: Nelson, New Zealand
The Nelson Mail reports that the Artery nightclub in Nelson, New Zealand has been served with a noise abatement notice after neighbors complained about a loud, repetitive bass thumping. The club believes it is being picked on, but the local environmental officer says that he is simply applying the local noise limits -- which is 50 decibels at the property line for bass -- to the club's noise.
The article reports that the Artery nightclub in Nelson, New Zealand has been served with a noise abatement notice after neighbors complained about a loud, repetitive bass thumping. The club has been soundproofed substantially, but noise has continued to be a problem: especially in the bass range.
The article notes that the club believes it is being picked on, but the local environmental officer says that he is simply applying the local noise limits -- which is 50 decibels at the property line for bass -- to the club's noise. Bass receives special consideration because of its "special audible character." The club's lease says it can not be a nuisance to neighbors.
The article goes on to say that the environmental officer says that the 100 decibel music levels inside the club are excessive. Club officials maintain that even an unamplified drum kit would violate the city's excessively strict laws.
PUBLICATION: New Scientist
DATE: November 27, 1999
SECTION: This Week, Pg. 24
BYLINE: Philip Cohen
DATELINE: Boston, Massachusetts
The New Scientist reports that a study at Boston's Harvard Medical School suggests that a sauna -- which essentially subjects the body to mild heat shock -- may prepare the ears to better handle excessive noise. Heat-shock proteins normally serve to protect proteins from unfolding and to re-fold damaged ones; once activated by the sauna, these proteins may be protecting proteins that could normally be damaged by noise.
The article reports that a study at Boston's Harvard Medical School suggests that a sauna -- which essentially subjects the body to mild heat shock -- may prepare the ears to better handle excessive noise. A study showed that raising mice whose body temperatures were raised before exposure to 2 hours of 100 decibel noise experienced 13 decibels of hearing loss at key frequencies; mice who were not warmed experienced 40 decibels of loss at the same frequencies.
The article notes that scientists hypothesize that heat-shock proteins normally serve to protect proteins from unfolding and to re-fold damaged ones; once activated by the sauna, these proteins may be protecting proteins that could normally be damaged by noise.
PUBLICATION: The Timaru Herald
DATE: November 27, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 2
DATELINE: Mt. Cook, New Zealand
The Timaru Herald reports that the Department of Conservation in Aoraki/Mt Cook, New Zealand believes that airlines have been voluntarily cooperating to reduce noise, by trying to use alternative flight paths that keep planes "high and wide" of populated areas and recreational sites.
The article reports that the Department of Conservation in Aoraki/Mt Cook, New Zealand believes that the monitoring of aircraft noise has helped to quiet the area for residents and recreators. After two years, airlines have established and environmental policy which considers impact on the ground, and tries to use alternative flight paths that keep planes "high and wide" of populated areas and recreational sites.
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: November 26, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Dan Mccue
DATELINE: Stuart, Florida
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News reports that the Martin County Airport in Stuart, Florida is beginning a Part 150 study. The first piece of the study will cost $35,000, and will monitor jet noise over the Thanksgiving holiday with twelve noise monitors
The article notes that a Part 150 study is a comprehensive study of jet noise impacts that the FAA requires before it will approve mandatory curfews or aircraft bans. The full study could take up to 18 months.
The article goes on to say that pressure from a local group, called the Witham Airport Active Majority, contributed to the county's decision to undertake the study, which will cost $236,000 this year. The group points to an increase in noise in recent past as degrading quality of life for residents in the area.
The article notes that the FAA, and the state Department of Transportation, will not fund an airport if it institutes mandatory curfews without approval. The airport had asked for curfews without success in the past. They currently post signs on taxiways asking pilots to eliminate unnecessary noise, and ask pilots to voluntarily restrict their flights between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
The article goes on to say that the airport is also altering its twenty-year long-term master plan, which may be affected by results from the Part 150 study.
PUBLICATION: The Times
DATE: November 26, 1999
SECTION: Features
BYLINE: Catherine Chetwynd
DATELINE: London, England
The Times reports that Luton Airport in London, England has prioritized protection of the environment. The noise policy is strict: the toughest in London. A new rail line is scheduled to open, and should reduce automobile traffic to the airport. Other areas considered are air quality, waste, energy, water protection, and ecology.
The article reports that Luton Airport in London, England has prioritized protection of the environment. It is expanding rapidly, but one year ago established a formal environmental department. They are working on a management system that can be accredited as complying with the ISO 1401 environmental standard.
The article notes that the noise policy is strict: the toughest in London. A new rail line is scheduled to open, and should reduce automobile traffic to the airport. Other areas considered are air quality, waste, energy, water protection, and ecology. Wildlife such as "brown hare -- which are declining nationally -- skylarks, yellowhammers, linnets and insects such as the increasingly rare marbled white butterfly thrive in it, as do plants such as orchids."
PUBLICATION: The Union Leader
DATE: November 26, 1999
SECTION: Section A Pg. 1
BYLINE: D. Allan Kerr
DATELINE: Durham, New Hampshire
The Union Leader reports that a man who is building a boat on a friend's property has infuriated some residents of Durham, New Hampshire -- including a town council member who happens to live next to the property -- who say the project is a noisy, smelly eyesore. The council is trying to prove that the boat building is not a permissible use, even though boats have been built in the neighborhood for decades. The town zoning administrator ruled twice that the use was permissible, but a rehearing was called: the only time one of his decisions had been questioned in that way.
The article reports that a man who is building a boat on a friend's property has infuriated some residents of Durham, New Hampshire who say the project is a noisy, smelly eyesore. The boat builder lost his boat/home at sea during rough seas, and his friend -- who has owned the property for a long time but has only lived there recently -- offered to let him use his property.
The article notes that annoyed residents notified the town council, whose chairperson happens to live next to the property. The town council then ruled that the boat builder -- who was living in a mobile home -- could not live there because it was a flood plain and no proper sewer line existed; he had been emptying his septic at the proper facility, but he was still forced to move.
The article goes on to say that many residents and officials are upset at the amount of time that the council continues to spend in trying to have the boat removed from the property; they are trying to prove that the boat building is not a permissible use, even though boats have been built in the neighborhood for decades. Meanwhile, other important matters haven't been allowed on the docket.
The article notes that the town zoning administrator ruled twice that the use was permissible, but a rehearing was called: the only time one of his decisions had been questioned in that way.
PUBLICATION: Western Daily Press
DATE: November 26, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.15
BYLINE: Steve Partridge
DATELINE: Gloucester, United Kingdom
The Western Daily Press reports that as residents call for a ban on heavy trucks in Gloucester, U.K., officials wrestle with possible solutions. They are looking into a weight-limit of 3.5, 77, or 17 tons.
The article reports that as residents call for a ban on heavy trucks in Gloucester, U.K., officials wrestle with possible solutions. Officials want a solution that will not force trucks into other neighborhoods, will not prevent trucks with legitimate business at the local Technology Park from using the roads, and yet will accommodate resident concerns over noise. They are looking into a weight-limit of 3.5, 77, or 17 tons. An access road was considered, but is too expensive according to the Department of Transportation.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: November 26, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. 14; Zone: N
DATELINE: Illinois
The Chicago Tribune prints an editorial which explains that a noise law, passed by the Illinois General Assembly in 1990, has been overturned because it played favorites with forms of expression by exempting advertising noise.
The article prints an editorial which explains that a noise law, passed by the Illinois General Assembly in 1990, has been overturned because it played favorites with forms of expression. The law prohibited music and other noise from being heard from cars 75 feet away, but exempted advertising noise.
The editorial says that the assembly should follow the Supreme Court's guidance, saying that commercial messages enjoy LESS protection than personal ones, and enact a more complete law.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. N36
BYLINE: Sherry Behrle
DATELINE: Tujunga, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles prints several letters to the editor, one of which has to do with noise. The Tujunga, California resident says that noise is irritating and should be treated the same, even if it is from a religious organization.
"Re "Too much spirit? Neighbors complain about noise services" (Nov. 7):
The racial hate crime card is being played to squelch another person's freedom of speech and their right to the pursuit of happiness.
Will we now have to zone areas as residential and religious? I would think when you live in an area zoned residential, you have good reason to expect peace and quiet. Especially in the evenings.
Traffic and noise four times per week or more sounds more like a night club than just a church.
No one has a constitutional right to disrupt other people's lives on an ongoing basis. Hiding behind the cross does not make inconsideration for others a considerate thing to do."
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: Pg.2
BYLINE: Myranda Mowafi
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that the British government plans to conduct noise tests -- in response to resident complaints -- along the noisy A30 highway in Exeter next Easter. Independent noise tests last summer showed that the surface exceeded expected noise levels that were referred to in public hearings.
The article reports that the British government plans to conduct noise tests along the A30 highway in Exeter next Easter. The tests were planned after 2,000 residents submitted a petition to resurface the excessively loud brushed-concrete surface with asphalt.
The article notes that the tests were delayed so traffic volume and speed -- which are reduced in the winter -- will be typical when the tests are conducted. Noise tests last summer showed that noise levels from the surface -- which is durable and costs less, but is among the loudest available -- exceeded expected levels that were referred to in public hearings.
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: Community; Pg. 08
BYLINE: Lisa Faught
DATELINE: Costa Mesa, California
The Orange County Register reports that the route for an urban rail line through Costa Mesa, California -- which will be part of the larger Orange County urban rail project -- was approved by the County. Residents have expressed concern over noise levels, and at least one potential route was rejected because of its proximity to residents.
The article notes that after a neighboring community protested, the line -- which was originally planned to be 28 miles long -- was cut to 11.4 miles; some say that will not attract enough passengers.
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: Local News; Pg. B04
BYLINE: Wes Orshoski; Jim Radcliffe
DATELINE: Irvine, California
The Orange County Register reports that the Millennium Plan -- a city-proposed development -- is poised to replace a county-proposed airport. An environmental impact report on the plan says noise would increase by 1.5 decibels on nearby roadways.
The article reports that the Millennium Plan -- a city-proposed development -- is poised to replace a county-proposed airport on an old Marines base. An environmental impact report on the plan says noise would be produced by the 228,018 additional cars that the development would draw, and levels along nearby roadways would increase by 1.5 decibels.
The article notes that construction would never take place at night over the 20-year construction period. One of the loudest jobs would be removal of the airport runways. An environmental impact report is planned for the airport project, and noise levels may well be louder from a proposed airport.
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. A01
BYLINE: Peter Larsen
DATELINE: Anaheim, California
The Orange County Register reports that Anaheim, California has noted that it will continue support for the El Toro Airport proposal only if the County promises to adequately mitigate noise impacts for residents. One of those mitigations would be a night-time noise curfew.
The article reports that Anaheim, California -- which has supported the El Toro Airport proposal from the beginning -- has noted that it will continue support only if the County promises to adequately mitigate noise impacts for residents. Anaheim wants one of those mitigations to be a night-time noise curfew, which requires a significant study before the FAA will consider it. A local legislator believes he can push for an exemption from the required study, since El Toro will be a new airport, and since it is needed so desperately.
The article notes that airport supporters believe Anaheim -- which relies on airport capacity for its economy -- will continue to support the airport, regardless of noise mitigation efforts.
PUBLICATION: The Seattle Times
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. B7; Letters To The Editor
BYLINE: Janet Flanders Johnston
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Janet Flanders Johnston Chair, Citizens for Airplane Noise Equity Seattle
The Seattle Times prints a letter to the editor from the chair of Citizens for Airplane Noise Equity Seattle. She suggests several measures that will help minimize and equitably share noise impacts from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
"Editor, The Times
As the weather cools off, the efforts to reduce neighborhood aircraft noise are heating up. And, unlike the situation in the past, it is more than one or two neighborhoods that are getting heated up. Leaders of 10 Seattle-area community councils have signed a letter to the Port of Seattle urging them to consider alternatives that equitably distribute the growing problem of aircraft noise instead of continuing to bombard the relatively few neighborhoods that now see and hear most of the jet traffic.
People are hearing more noise than ever because traffic at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport has increased 60 percent since 1990, now averaging more than 1,000 flights a day. And that number is expected to continue to climb in the coming years.
The Port's consultant made recommendations on Nov. 17 that are a step in the right direction, but they fall short. Here are some ways the Port and FAA can minimize aircraft noise and equitably distribute noise for everyone:
As much as possible, have planes (particularly older, noisier jets) use designated noise -abatement routes, such as the Duwamish Valley industrial corridor and Elliott Bay.
When industrial corridors are used to full capacity or are not available, disperse flights to reduce airplane frequency and minimize unfair impact on any one residential community.
Extend nighttime restrictions over residential neighborhoods for north-flow departures.
To the extent that is safely possible, adjust landing flight paths to reduce noise levels.
If all Seattle-area residents benefit from a conveniently located airport, shouldn't all residents be willing to accept some airplane noise? That is the perspective of the citizens - that a plan must be developed that adheres to the basic principles of fairness. "
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 25, 1999
SECTION: City & State; Pg. 3B
BYLINE: Kelly Ryan
DATELINE: St. Petersburg, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times reports that the Power Boat World Championships wants to return to St. Petersburg, Florida next year, and they have already talked to the mayor about working together to improve the event. The mayor has said she appreciates the economic benefits of such an event, and wants to help event planners evaluate possible negative impacts -- such as excessive noise and damage to estuaries -- on downtown residents.
The article reports that the Power Boat World Championships wants to return to St. Petersburg, Florida next year, and they have already talked to the mayor about working together to improve the event. The mayor has said she appreciates the economic benefits of such an event, and wants to help event planners evaluate possible negative impacts -- such as excessive noise -- on downtown residents.
The article noted that the event drew 200,000 people, cost $500,000 to stage, and contributed $8-million in revenue to local businesses. Proceeds go to a charity to help retarded children. Many residents downtown said they liked the action, despite some of the noise and parking problems.
The article goes on to say that some boaters ignored proper boating areas and damaged grass flats which are "a critical part of the Tampa Bay estuary and vital to the well-being of endangered Manatees."
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 18
BYLINE: Robert C. Herguth and Carlos Sadovi
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times reports that Chicago's O'Hare Airport will be giving several communities -- including Oak Park -- a temporary noise monitor to keep track of aircraft noise in the area to see if noise levels warrant a permanent one.
The article reports that Chicago's O'Hare Airport will be giving several communities -- including Oak Park -- a temporary noise monitor to keep track of aircraft noise in the area. If the noise is comparable to noise in other communities with permanent noise monitors, Oak Park will receive a permanent monitor.
The article notes that Oak Park residents have been complaining increasingly about nighttime airport noise.
PUBLICATION: Copley News Service
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
BYLINE: Joe Mahr
DATELINE: Springfield, Illinois
The Copley News Service reports that since the Illinois State Supreme Court has thrown out an unconstitutional state law that exempted ice cream trucks and other advertisers from vehicle noise laws, many municipal noise ordinances in Illinois may have to be changed as well. State legislators originally wanted to protect ice cream trucks which were just "playing a jingle", but the court and anti-noise activists say "noise abatement is noise abatement."
The article reports that since the Illinois State Supreme Court has thrown out an unconstitutional state law that exempted ice cream trucks and other advertisers from vehicle noise laws, many municipal noise ordinances in Illinois may have to be changed as well. Some communities modeled their noise laws after the state law, and those ordinance may no longer stand up in court.
The article notes that state legislators originally wanted to protect ice cream trucks which were just "playing a jingle", but the court and anti-noise activists say "noise abatement is noise abatement." Also, some say that ice cream trucks can be dangerous because they bring kids running out into city streets. The state fine for loud music has been $50 for music audible at 75 feet away.
The article notes that the state plans to have a new law, without such an exemption, on the books by July. Until then, many municipalities may have to remove their ordinances entirely: avoiding lawsuits but freeing vehicle-bound noise makers to be loud.
PUBLICATION: Copley News Service
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
BYLINE: Joe Mahr
DATELINE: Springfield, Illinois
The Copley News Service reports that Springfield, Illinois is planning to strengthen their noise ordinance by allowing police to impound cars with stereos playing at an excessively loud volume. The ordinance, which is borrowing from similar ordinances in nearby communities Rock Island and Kankakee, should be drafted within three months.
The article reports that Springfield, Illinois is planning to strengthen their noise ordinance by allowing police to impound cars with stereos at excessively loud volume. First time offenders may only get a ticket, which can range from $250 to $750. City officials say that if your car is impounded, you will have the right to a timely hearing; if they go with one time period, hearings within 48 hours, then would need to schedule more frequent hearings than the current once a week.
The article notes that the ordinance, which is borrowing from similar ordinances in nearby communities Rock Island and Kankakee, should be drafted within three months.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N3
BYLINE: Rick Orlov
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that a Los Angeles City Council proposal to begin phasing out Stage 2 jets from Van Nuys Airport has been delayed for 90 days to get answers from the FAA about its legality. Residents near the airport say the proposal doesn't go far enough, while airport employees and operators say they will lose their livelihood.
The article reports that a Los Angeles City Council proposal to begin phasing out Stage 2 jets from Van Nuys Airport has been delayed for 90 days to get answers from the FAA about its legality. Residents near the airport say the proposal -- which calls for the phasing out of all Stage 2 jets, even if fitted with hushkits -- doesn't go far enough and will actually "guarantee that noisy jets will remain at Van Nuys forever." Airport employees and operators -- especially those who specialize in repair and maintenance of the noisier jets -- say they will be closed down by the plan.
The article notes that residents don't like certain aspects of the plan, like unlimited takeoffs and landings. Airport operators say the "voluntary 'fly friendly' program [now in effect], with pilots taking off at quieter levels, has helped reduce some of the impact over the years so a smaller area is affected by the jet noise."
The article goes on to say that it is clear that the airport can forbid any additional Stage 2 jets from using the airport, but it is not clear whether it can phase out ones that are already stationed there.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: Pg.12
BYLINE: Myranda Mowafi
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that members of "Resurface the A30" in Exeter, U.K. plan to employ an expert to help their campaign, and are raising funds that could be used to pay that expert.
The article reports that members of "Resurface the A30" in Exeter, U.K. plan to employ an expert to represent them in communications with the Highway Agency. The group is currently trying to raise 4,000 pounds from supporters in the area to help pay the expert, who will help the Highway Agency in conducting noise tests and producing a report for the government.
PUBLICATION: M2 Presswire
DATE: November 24, 1999
DATELINE: London, England
The M2 Presswire reports that London, England's Heathrow Airport will extend its policy of runway alternation into the night hours. Runway alternation -- which designates a particular runway each week to allow residents predictable periods of quiet -- has taken place at Heathrow since the 1970s, but night flights have not alternated to allow for night-maintenance on whichever runways were in need. The government is still trying to decide on details of the policy.
The article reports that London, England's Heathrow Airport will extend its policy of runway alternation into the night hours. Runway alternation -- which designates a particular runway each week to allow residents predictable periods of quiet -- has taken place at Heathrow since the 1970s, but night flights have not alternated to allow for night-maintenance on whichever runways were in need.
The article notes that runway alternation only applies to flights coming over the more populated area east of the airport, where all flight paths impact a large number of people. The government is trying to decide on details of the policy. One complication is whether to build in a one hour period when runway alternation would not apply -- from 6 a.m. to 7 a.m. -- so any runway backups can be cleared before the peak morning time.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 1C
BYLINE: Gregory Smith
DATELINE: Providence, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that a hip-hop music club operating in Providence, Rhode Island is having its liquor license threatened after continued noise, violence, and parking problems continue to draw complaints. A city councilman, together with a citizens association and other residents, is asking that the club's license not be renewed. The owner says that the club is being blamed for problems it hasn't caused, but has said that she may consider a change of format from hip-hop to top-40 to draw a quieter clientele.
The article reports that a hip-hop music club operating in Providence, Rhode Island is having its liquor license threatened after continued noise, violence, and parking problems continue to draw complaints. The club paid a fine last week for failing to have a required police detail present during a show: a requirement that police say could have prevented a shooting.
The article notes that the owner of the club is considering a shift from hip-hop music to top-40 music, saying that such a change would change the clientele that the club attracts. The operators of the club, who are black, are attacking this proposed change as a racist decision, unfairly labeling minorities -- who make up a large portion of the audience at the hip-hop shows -- as troublemakers.
The article notes that a Neighbors say that the club -- which hosts events that can draw as many as 2,000 -- is excessively loud and exacerbates parking problems in the area: especially when holding outdoor concerts in their parking lot. The city council has proposed an ordinance that would limit the number of such outdoor events to at least three, or possibly just one.
The article goes on to say that the owner of the building has been attacked for owing substantial back taxes; she says she is on a payment plan, since a former business partner hurt the business financially. She also says that the club is being blamed for problems it hasn't caused; for instance, although neighbors blame the club's patrons from public urination, she notes that many other clubs have far fewer bathrooms relative to their capacity.
PUBLICATION: Sarasota Herald-Tribune
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: B Section, Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Tabatha Barham
DATELINE: Sarasota County, Florida
The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reports that Florida's Sarasota County commission decided to table proposed amendments to the noise ordinance. Noise is currently limited to 55 or 65 decibels, depending on the area.
The article reports that Florida's Sarasota County commission decided to table proposed amendments to the noise ordinance. They decided that the key is not changing the definitions of noise violations, but enforcing the existing definitions. Suggestions included no first-time warnings: the $250 fine would be levied even for first-time offenders.
The article notes that resident complaints about two particular nightclubs sparked the discussion over the noise ordinance. The county administrator plans to meet with the sheriff to determine how enforcement of the current ordinance can improve. Now, noise is limited to 55 or 65 decibels, depending on the area.
PUBLICATION: South China Morning Post
DATE: November 24, 1999
SECTION: Letters To The Editor; Pg. 20
BYLINE: Olivia Ma
DATELINE: Tuen Mun, China
The South China Morning Post prints a letter to the editor from a resident of Tuen Mun, China who says that district council candidates should not be allowed to use amplifiers to blare their campaign messages.
"I am concerned about the noise being made by District Councils Election candidates in the run-up to Sunday's poll. During the period of the election, most of the candidates are making every effort to persuade citizens to vote for them.
This generally entails settling inside a housing estate and using microphones or loudspeakers to get across their message.
They even tape their words and broadcast them again and again through an amplifier.
This causes a disturbance to residents on these estates and I think it is wrong.
Candidates should not be allowed to use any amplifier for propaganda purposes. Also, they should be concerned about noise pollution. It is bad enough that they use up a lot of wood and paper with their election pamphlets; something which is not environmentally friendly.
The Government should address this problem of noise pollution caused by these candidates."
PUBLICATION: City News Service
DATE: November 23, 1999
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Mike Stevens, president of LAX Expansion NO!
The City News Service reports that the Los Angeles City Council has delayed a vote on a proposal that would limit noisy Stage 2 jets at the airport. Residents say they were there first, but business representatives say the limitations could cause a loss of $750 million and 2,400 jobs. Also, the Orange County Board of Supervisors have agreed to place an initiative on the ballot that could require a two-thirds majority vote to approve public projects such as airports. Residents hope that the initiative will stop the proposed El Toro Airport.
The article reports that the Los Angeles City Council has delayed a vote on a proposal that would limit noisy Stage 2 jets at the airport. Airport opponents and supporters both think the proposal is bad. The council will use the delay to ask questions of the FAA about the council's legal power to impose such measures. Residents say they were there first, but business representatives say the limitations could cause a loss of $750 million and 2,400 jobs.
The article notes that in other airport news, the Orange County Board of Supervisors have agreed to place an initiative on the ballot that could require a two-thirds majority vote to approve public projects such as airports. Residents, who collected 192,000 signatures -- more than twice the number required -- hope that the initiative will stop the proposed El Toro Airport. Activists who are concerned about the expansion of Los Angeles International Airport are upset, since they believe that Los Angeles will likely expand in the absence of El Toro.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: News; Local; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Myers John
DATELINE: Palmerston North, New Zealand
The Evening Standard reports that after a series of hearings regarding airport noise in Palmerston North, New Zealand, new guidelines have been established for noise abatement. Ground engine-testing rules, land uses, and noise limits were set.
The article reports that after a series of hearings regarding airport noise in Palmerston North, New Zealand, new guidelines have been established for noise abatement. Ground engine-testing, which was a major issue in the community, will be restricted to enclosures except for "essential, unscheduled" tests which may only happen during the night five times in three months. Also, local officials must be notified in advance if engines are to be tested at over 40% output.
The article notes that the hearings also confirmed noise zones -- in which noise-sensitive development is restricted -- and established a noise limit dubbed the "noise bucket" which may be met but not exceeded. Soundproofing requirements were set for houses near the airport, and military flights were restricted to before 9 p.m. in the winter and 10 p.m. in the summer.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: News; Local; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Myers John
DATELINE: Palmerston North, New Zealand
The Evening Standard reports that the commissioner of recent airport-noise hearings in Palmerston North, New Zealand admits that "adverse effects" from airport noise may still be present even after the recent establishment of noise rules. The commissioner refused to totally ban nighttime engine testing, saying that occasional, unavoidable nighttime testing was essential to the airport's operation.
The article reports that the commissioner of recent airport-noise hearings in Palmerston North, New Zealand admits that "adverse effects" from airport noise may still be present even after the recent establishment of noise rules; the rules include land use restrictions in certain noise zones, and restriction of engine testing.. The commissioner says that nevertheless, "the air noise boundary control will ensure that these effects are sustainable in the wider public interest."
The article also notes that the commissioner believes there is no basis for claims of lowered property values because of the newly-established noise zone. Valuations experts did not say that the zone would have any effect on the housing market; if claims did arise, residents would have to go through the Environment court; they would be able to push for the council to buy their land.
The article goes on to say that the commissioner refused to totally ban nighttime engine testing, saying that occasional, unavoidable nighttime testing was essential to the airport's operation.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: Pg.2
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that West Sussex, United Kingdom residents -- who have been fighting for resurfacing of a loud, concrete highway for 11 years -- have expressed their outrage that the government has used the same material to build the A30 in Exeter, U.K. The current campaign in Exeter, which has included a 2,000 signature petition, has finally prompted an investigation into the noise there. The Refined Bitumen Association has begun a silent road campaign to unify residents with similar highway-noise problems across the country.
The article reports that West Sussex, United Kingdom residents -- who have been fighting for resurfacing of a loud, concrete highway for 11 years -- have expressed their outrage that the government has used the same material to build the A30 in Exeter, U.K. Earlier this year, a linking highway was laid in the same material as well; campaigners say that the government has learned nothing from the protests of residents elsewhere.
The article goes on to quote an activist, who said that "The ribbed concrete is used because it is cheaper and longer lasting but with the anti- noise laws now in existence no agency or company should be allowed to inflict this noise on people's lives." The current campaign in Exeter, which has included a 2,000 signature petition, has finally prompted an investigation into the noise there.
The article notes that the Refined Bitumen Association has begun a silent road campaign to unify residents with similar highway-noise problems across the country.
PUBLICATION: The Hartford Courant
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: Town News; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Eric Rich
DATELINE: Cromwell, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant reports that when police responded to noise complaints at a Hartford, Connecticut home, they found numerous high-school students drinking underage and made several arrests.
The article reports that when police responded to noise complaints at a Hartford, Connecticut home, they found numerous high-school students drinking underage. Four arrests occurred, and several parents were called to pick up their intoxicated children. The host's father -- who was not home at the time -- said that the party had gotten out of hand, and that half of the kids at the party were not invited.
PUBLICATION: The Indianapolis Star
DATE: November 23, 1999
BYLINE: Barb Albert
DATELINE: Indianapolis, Indiana
The Indianapolis Star reports that operators of an Indianapolis Conference Center -- which is just attempting a comeback after closing several years ago -- oppose a proposal that would place a go-kart track one floor above them. Sound experts say no noise would come through, but operators are wary of the recent $8-million investment in the building.
The article reports that operators of an Indianapolis Conference Center -- which is just attempting a comeback after closing several years ago -- oppose a proposal that would place a go-kart track one floor above them. City officials, who hired a sound test at the site, said that tests with one go-kart showed that absolutely no sound came through; operators say that the situation would be different with many carts, and said that after an $8-million investment in the building they are wary of things that could "eliminate potential success."
The article notes that the Mayor thinks the facility would bring more people to downtown, and would actually "be an upscale operation that corporations would rent for use by their employees." The operators can control who goes into the rest of the station, but the Metropolitan Development Commission can override decision it deems "unreasonable."
PUBLICATION: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: News South Pg. 6
BYLINE: Patrick Milhizer
DATELINE: Franklin, Wisconsin
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that a natural barrier of evergreen trees -- which was supposed to protect neighbors of a Franklin, Wisconsin high school from noise and exhaust fumes -- has been deemed inadequate by the residents. School district officials claim that the evergreens are spaced as they are because some residents insisted on keeping black walnut trees on their property; when the leaves drop, the barrier is ineffective.
The article reports that a natural barrier of evergreen trees -- which was supposed to protect neighbors of a Franklin, Wisconsin high school from noise and exhaust fumes -- has been deemed inadequate by the residents. They say that the trees aren't close enough together to block anything, that only one row of trees was planted when two were promised. The barrier was first considered as part of a school expansion project.
The article notes that the school district claims that the evergreens are spaced as they are because some residents insisted on keeping black walnut trees on their property; when the leaves drop, the barrier is ineffective. School officials say that their mistake was in "allowing the neighbors to have a voice in the property altering. We could have taken the stance most schools do -- say 'It's our property' and put up a fence." In that case, they say that the project would have cost $31,000 instead of the $110,542 spent to date.
The article goes on to say that at least one resident says that some trees were removed with the understanding that there would be two rows of evergreens. She also questioned how much of the supposed expense was due to resident demands.
PUBLICATION: The Washington Post
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: Financial; Pg. E01
BYLINE: Frank Swoboda
DATELINE: Washington D.C.
The Washington Post reports that US Airways is the first to introduce a 6 a.m. shuttle from Washington's Reagan National Airport to New York's LaGuardia Airport. New aircraft allow the airline to meet noise limits required of early takeoffs.
The article reports that US Airways is the first to introduce a 6 a.m. shuttle from Washington's Reagan National Airport to New York's LaGuardia Airport; federal regulations require certain noise limits to be met for takeoffs that early, and new aircraft have allowed US Airways to meet those limits.
The article notes that the new aircraft have a "75-decibel footprint on takeoff... [and] can gain altitude faster, [reducing] the footprint of the engine noise [to] one-tenth that of the planes they are replacing."
PUBLICATION: Western Morning News
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: Pg.8
DATELINE: Plymouth, United Kingdom
The Western Morning News reports that a "silent roads" campaign has been started by the RAC Foundation and the Refined Bitumen Association. Residents calling campaign officials can learn of techniques to pressure government officials as well as other localities where a similar fight is occurring. Six petrochemical companies are funding the campaign.
The article reports that a "silent roads" campaign has been started by the RAC Foundation and the Refined Bitumen Association. The campaign comes in response to recent public outcry from those living near the U.K.'s A30, and other noisy roads.
The article notes that materials for quieter roads which use "negative texture", or pits in the surface to improve traction, cost more than concrete for positive texture roads, which use bumps. Construction can move faster for the quieter roads, however, which balances out costs. Also, the quieter roads drain away water, making the roads safer. They do, however, not last as long as concrete roads and some localities are having trouble allocating funds for maintenance.
The article goes on to say that the campaign "calls on road authorities to put traffic noise near the top of the agenda and encourage the use of noise -reducing asphalts when resurfacing roads." Residents calling campaign officials can learn of techniques to pressure government officials as well as other localities where a similar fight is occurring. Six petrochemical companies are funding the campaign.
The article also notes that government officials have promised to establish a new requirement that roads carrying over 70,000 cars must use the quietest materials available.
PUBLICATION: Western Daily Press
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.11
BYLINE: Barry Leighton
DATELINE: Swindon, United Kingdom
The Western Daily Press reports that a proposal to turn a 131-year-old clocktower building in Swindon, U.K. into a nightclub is drawing protest from residents who think that noise will be too much of a problem. Residents fear screaming patrons and honking cars at the nightclub, which would operate from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. Thursday through Saturday and 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on Sunday.
The article reports that a proposal to turn a 131-year-old clocktower building in Swindon, U.K. into a nightclub is drawing protest from residents who think that noise will be too much of a problem. An entrepeneur wants to create a club in the long-closed building, and says that this plans will revitalize the long stagnant historic downtown of the community.
The article notes that residents fear screaming patrons and honking cars at the nightclub, which would operate from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. Thursday through Saturday and 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on Sunday. The council's environmental health officer believes noise can be controlled inside the building, but these outside concerns are more difficult.
PUBLICATION: AP Worldstream
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: International News
BYLINE: Dan Smith
DATELINE: Okinawa, Japan
The AP Worldstream reports that the governor of Okinawa, Japan has proposed a new site for the heliport currently located on a local U.S. Marines Base. Residents around the base complain currently, but some officials in Naga, the new location for the heliport, are upset that the public there wasn't consulted.
The article reports that the governor of Okinawa, Japan has proposed a new site for the heliport currently located on a local U.S. Marines Base. Residents continually complain about aircraft noise, and have been increasingly upset with the U.S. military since the 1995 rape of a schoolgirl by three U.S. military personnel. After that, the U.S. and Japan agreed to close the base and move the heliport within several years.
The article notes that the proposed site is located in a less populated area north of the current site. Residents want the base moved from the island entirely, but the governor said a compromise is best. Expectation of a major "summit of the world's top industrialized nations next July" provided some pressure to solve the noise problem rapidly. The base currently is home to "two-thirds of the more than 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan," and the largest presence of Marines outside of the U.S.
The article notes that some officials in Naga, the new location for the heliport, are upset that the public wasn't consulted.
PUBLICATION: Aviation Week and Space Technology
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Air Transport; Vol. 151, No. 21; Pg. 45
BYLINE: Pierre Sparaco
DATELINE: Cannes, France
Aviation Week and Space Technology reports that French environmental officials believe that in working towards the carbon dioxide limits set by the U.N.'s global warming conference in Kyoto, researchers should also prioritize noise reduction. Turbines are 40% quieter than they were in the 1970s, and many further gains in noise reduction will result from work on non-engine components.
The article reports that French environmental officials believe that in working towards the carbon dioxide limits set by the U.N.'s global warming conference in Kyoto, researchers should also prioritize noise reduction. Although the Kyoto protocol -- which the U.N. hoped enough countries would accept this year so efforts can get underway -- doesn't consider noise issues, growing resident complaints and increasingly strict noise regulations suggest that unified approach is in order.
The article notes that turbines are 40% quieter than they were in the 1970s, and further gains in noise reduction will use "nacelles, active noise control and multi-frequency tuning, fan noise diversion, laminar flow control and new aerodynamic concepts set to reduce, for example, landing gear drag." Officials expect a 5-6 dB/aircraft noise reduction over the next ten years.
PUBLICATION: The Buffalo News
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Viewpoints, Pg. 3B
BYLINE: Larry Beahan
DATELINE: Amherst, New York
The Buffalo News prints a letter to the editor from a man in Amherst, New York who believes that despite the low turnout at a recent public meeting, many visitors to state and national parks resent the noise and pollution from snowmobiles.
"I hate snowmobiles. I used to be indifferent to them. When I worked on the Kissing Bridge Ski Patrol, they were a help.
But when I saw what a two-lane snowmobile highway did to a piece of Allegany State Park woods, I got angry at the planners who did not follow the environmental review laws.
When I visited Yellowstone and breathed two-cycle engine fumes and was deafened by the roar of snowmobiles vying with the buffalo for the right of way, I was pretty well sold.
After I testified at a Nov. 9 hearing by Assemblyman Paul Tokasz's Committee on Tourism, you can set me down as hating snowmobiles and the commercial system that promotes them.
The hearing was convened in Hamburg to hear opinions on tripling the state snowmobile license fee from $15 to $35 and other issues including speed, alcohol, safety and the effect of their trail system on the environment. The list of 13 speakers was packed with snowmobilers, virtually all demanding more and wider trails.
When I got to speak, I pointed out the unpopular fact that this legislative gathering to discuss motorized exploitation of our forests was, almost exclusively, snowmobile owners.
I went on to lambaste snowmobiling, its noise and pollution, its domination of space, the increasing size and lethality of its machines and the disproportionate bite snowmobiling takes out of places like the Adirondacks and Allegany State Park.
The operator of Snow Ridge Ski Area spoke for landowners and protested the trespassing and noise of the machines. The legal counsel for the Adirondack Mountain Club testified in an even-handed fashion that if there were an increase in snowmobile fees, some of it should be spent on environmental impact studies of proposed new trails.
OK, snowmobiling won't go away. But hear this: Lots of us resent the noise and smelly intrusion of motorized vehicles in the clear quiet air of our woods.
We were not fairly represented at that hearing. There are only 109,000 snowmobile owners in New York State, but over a half a million people visit Allegany State Park every year. Very few of them are on snowmobiles."
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. N15
BYLINE: Mark Sullivan, president of Skytrails Aviation and the Van Nuys Airport Business Association
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that the Van Nuys Airport Business Association in Los Angeles, California opposes the proposed noise ordinance which it says would actually increase noise. The ordinance would cost hundreds of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in lost, taxable revenue. Property values which residents say are hurt by the airport are actually rising. The city would also be open to lawsuits from airport operators.
The article reports that the Van Nuys Airport Business Association in Los Angeles, California opposes the proposed noise ordinance. The president of that organization says that the city allowed residents to build in the noise impact area in the first place, and now they are trying to show their constituents they're doing "something" to reduce the noise.
The article notes that the ordinance would cost hundreds of jobs and hundreds of millions of lost, taxable revenue from the multi-billion dollar airport operation. He says that the noise impact area is 20 percent smaller than the FAA predicted several years ago, and the noise impact area with incompatible land use is only one percent the size of Los Angeles International Airport.
The article goes on to say that although homeowners say their property values are going down, independent auditors say they're going up. He says that instead of reducing noise from the airport, the ordinance would increase it by encouraging pilots to land at Van Nuys, and then takeoff to a nearby airport to base the aircraft.
The article also notes that by admission of the assistant city attorney for the Los Angeles World Airports, the ordinance would open the city to lawsuits from airport operators; an exemption that allows the "grandfathering in" of regulations -- an exemption the city is counting on -- may not apply since it requires regulations to be initiated before 1989.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. N14
BYLINE: Anne Carver, board member of Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association, and member of the Van Nuys Airport Citizens Advisory
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that residents around Los Angeles, California's Van Nuys Airport oppose a proposed noise ordinance that they say would not effectively address noise concerns, and would in fact lock-in many current noise problems. They suggest better solutions for a modified ordinance.
The article reports that residents around Los Angeles, California's Van Nuys Airport oppose a proposed noise ordinance that they say would not effectively address noise concerns, and would in fact lock-in many current noise problems. They say that the new noise ordinance does not include a gradual phase-out for the noisiest Stage 2 jets, does not say that no more Stage 2 jets can become based here, and does not limit Stage 2 jets that stop at the airport for maintenance.
The article notes that media helicopters are another noise nuisance at the airport that is not addressed by the ordinance. The authors says of other residents, "They do not reject it because they do not want relief, but they reject it because it does not do what it is supposed to do."
The article goes on to say that certain specific things should be added the ordinance before it will be acceptable. First, there should be a phase-out of Stage 2 jets. Tax incentives should be introduced for upgrading to quieter planes. There should be controls on the airport's size.
PUBLICATION: The Lawyer
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Litigation Analysis; Pg. 22
DATELINE: London, England
The Lawyer reports that the U.K.'s House of Lords ruled that landlords are not responsible for soundproofing their properties just because tenants can hear sounds of everyday life from their neighbors. The lords clarified the definition of "quiet enjoyment," saying that "in the eyes of the law "quiet enjoyment" had nothing to do with freedom from the noise of normal domestic activities." Quiet enjoyment could theoretically be affected by noise, but it would be noise more abnormal than that cited in the case.
The article reports that the law lords in the U.K.'s House of Lords ruled that landlords are not responsible for soundproofing their properties just because tenants can hear sounds of everyday life -- love-making, toilets, doors opening, etc. -- from their neighbors. The lower courts had ruled similarly, and the lords dismissed the appeal.
The article notes that the lords clarified the definition of "quiet enjoyment," which landlords are bound to preserve for tenants. The ruling said that "in the eyes of the law "quiet enjoyment" had nothing to do with freedom from the noise of normal domestic activities." It did say, however, that quiet enjoyment could theoretically be affected by noise, but it would be noise more abnormal than that cited in the case.
The article notes that if the lords had ruled in favor of the tenants, costs in a single borough would have reached 37 million pounds.
PUBLICATION: Leicester Mercury
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Features: General, Pg.6
BYLINE: D. A. Rimmington
DATELINE: Oadby, United Kingdom
The Leicester Mercury prints a letter to the editor that expresses concern over noise from a local aerodrome. The writer is dismayed because no agency has any jurisdiction over the noise.
"The recent correspondence complaining of the noisy planes flying over Oadby from 'Leicester Airport' is not without some justification. Having lived here for nearly 40 years I have accepted the general increase in noise from the A6 main road, the airliners overhead, and flights from Stoughton.
The marked increase in light aircraft and helicopter movements recently has meant that enjoyment of peaceful outdoor pursuits locally has often become impossible without the accompanying noise of low flying planes.
As I wished to establish whether or not this is an environmental issue, I recorded the regularity of planes passing over. However, the highest record of 75 planes over a ten hour period carried no weight with the powers that be, other than a sympathetic hearing. Oadby and Wigston Council advised me to contact Market Harborough Council as Stoughton aerodrome comes under their jurisdiction.
An Environmental Officer said that aeroplane nuisance was outside their remit and referred me to the Civil Aviation Authority, whose representative offered little consolation. Seemingly, within three miles of an airfield nothing can be done regarding air traffic density or noise, but very low flying over built up areas is another matter altogether.
Whilst we are deemed to be lucky not to live in Heathrow's flight path, the fact remains that these slow moving, noisy planes are most disturbing, particularly when people remark on the aeroplanes passing over our house, heard during long distance telephone calls, having to close doors and windows on a hot summer's day in order to properly hear a TV programme at normal sound volume, or spoiling a peaceful hour sitting in the garden to enjoy the fruits of one's labours.
The CAA spokesperson suggested that I expressed my concerns to the Aero Club and, by throwing myself on their mercy, might achieve a compromise over variation of flight paths, especially in the case of circuits and bumps, but in all truth, I cannot see my lone plea carrying much weight. It seems a shame that such a pleasant area in which to live should be subjected to noise pollution that is not entirely unavoidable."
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Patrick McGreevy
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that residents and government officials in Granada Hills, California want a police firing range to lower its volume. A $100,000 sound-absorbing wall is being considered after a barrage of complaints. To further complicate matters, neighbors of another police firing range in the city want more police to go to the Granada Hills facility, especially if it becomes soundproofed.
The article reports that residents and government officials in Granada Hills -- a community near Los Angeles, California -- want a police firing range to lower its volume. Some have even asked for its closure, but police say they will soon try soundproofing. Currently, the back of the firing range is not enclosed, but a $100,000 sound-absorbing wall is being considered after a barrage of complaints.
The article notes that the $29-million firing range has been open for only a year, and residents are already upset. To further complicate matters, neighbors of another police firing range in the city want more police to go to the Granada Hills facility, especially if it becomes soundproofed.
The article goes on to say that the 10,000 officers must requalify every two months with handgun use. Also, recruits train there extensively. The range is officially open from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m., but residents claim they've heard shooting as late as 9 p.m.
PUBLICATION: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Ozaukee Washington Pg. 1
BYLINE: Don Behm
DATELINE: Slinger, Wisconsin
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that residents in Slinger, Wisconsin are opposed to a proposed concrete plant that they say will increase noise, dust, and traffic. The planning commission says all of those concerns will be included in the development plan. 155 property owners have already signed a petition opposing the plant, and plan to file a lawsuit against the village if the plant is approved.
The article reports that residents in Slinger, Wisconsin are opposed to a proposed concrete plant that they say will increase noise, dust, and traffic. An 80-foot tower would be an ugly damage to home values. Dust would be washed off of gravel piles into the water supply. Particulates would get into the air.
The article notes that the planning commission says all of those concerns will be included in the development plan. They say the mixing process will be enclosed, dust will be filtered inside the facility, and the gravel piles will be surrounded by berms, all of which will help in preventing pollution problems. They say a certain road, which is the only local road that can handle the heavy trucks that will go to the facility 57 times each day, can handle the increased traffic.
The article notes that 155 property owners have already signed a petition opposing the plant, and a public meeting is scheduled today. Residents plan to file a lawsuit against the village if the plant is approved.
PUBLICATION: The Morning Call
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Regional Report, Pg. B2, Call Me Kelly
BYLINE: Jim Kelly
DATELINE: Shepherd Hills, Pennsylvania
The Morning Call reports that a columnist said that noise from Wal-Mart construction in Shepherd Hills, Pennsylvania is extremely intrusive. The site produces rumbles and beeps from 8 pieces of heavy equipment, bright lighting, and airborne dust from the site during periods of its 18 hours of operation each day.
The article reports that a columnist said that noise from Wal-Mart construction in Shepherd Hills, Pennsylvania is extremely intrusive. He notes that he visited the site and believes that rumbles and beeps from 8 pieces of heavy equipment, bright lighting, and airborne dust from the site is enough to upset anyone if it's present 18 hours each day.
The article notes that a local Supervisor said of the site "Maybe my hearing isn't so good, [but] I didn't really mind the noise that I heard."
PUBLICATION: The Press
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 7; Regional News
DATELINE: Park Terrace, New Zealand
The Press reports that a pile-driving construction project -- the second this year for the area -- is proposed in Park Terrace, New Zealand. Officials say that when possible, screw-type non-impact piles will be used in this four-month project to reduce noise and vibration impacts. Residents are still worried.
The article reports that a pile-driving construction project -- the second this year for the area -- is proposed in Park Terrace, New Zealand. Earlier this year, a six-month project drove many residents to move out of their homes. Officials say that when possible, screw-type non-impact piles will be used in this four-month project to reduce noise and vibration impacts.
The article notes that while representatives of local homeowners associations are glad that they were notified this time -- they were not last time -- they still worry about potential impacts.
PUBLICATION: Rubber and Plastics News
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 4
BYLINE: Vera Fedchenko, Crain News Service
The Rubber and Plastics News reports that the Yokohama Tire Company has introduced a new high-performance tire called the "AVS dB (for decibel)" that gives a quiet ride.
The article reports that the Yokohama Tire Company has introduced a new high-performance tire called the "AVS dB (for decibel)" that gives a quiet ride. "The tire's tread design features tusk grooves that become narrow at their open end to reduce noise caused by trapped air,... and are placed at a 20-degree angle to break up noise patterns.... The wave pattern in the tusk groove walls that prevents distortion of the groove during road contact and minimizes noise caused by escaping, compressed air. Narrow grooves in the shoulder restrict the space required for airflow noise." Also, the blocks of tread have different sizes and positions, to help self-cancel much of the typical noise.
PUBLICATION: The Seattle Times
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. B4; James Vesely
BYLINE: James Vesely
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
The Seattle Times reports that port commissioners will vote in the spring on a proposed two-tiered flight path that would spread noise more evenly over communities to the North of the Seattle-Tacoma Airport. The plan should reduce total noise impact in the North by 30 percent, as planes turn sooner and at a lower altitude.
The article reports that port commissioners will vote in the spring on a proposed two-tiered flight path that would spread noise more evenly over communities to the North of the Seattle-Tacoma Airport. The proposed flight path will reduce noise for some communities, while giving noise to some neighborhoods that currently have none.
The article notes that the plan should reduce total noise impact in the North by 30 percent, as planes turn sooner and at a lower altitude. Currently, 240 planes fly a single flight path to the North between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. on the ten days of the month when the wind allows. The new plan would cause planes to turn sooner and at a lower altitude.
The article goes on to say that at least one representative on the plan's study panel represents both neighborhoods that will have it better and those that will have it worse. He maintains that the total impact will drop, which is good for everybody.
PUBLICATION: South Wales Evening Post
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Business: Pubs/Clubs, Pg.3
BYLINE: Chris Peregrine
DATELINE: Swansea, Wales
The South Wales Evening Post reports that the local council has rejected an application from a Swansea, Wales club for a two-hour extension of their operating hours. Police feared the time would cause a sudden exodus that would draw noise complaints. Club owners said that noise issues could be dealt with, and said the exodus would not be sudden.
The article reports that the local council has rejected an application from a Swansea, Wales club for a two-hour extension of their operating hours. Operators argue that many clubs in the nearby Kingsway area are allowed to open until 4 a.m., and say that councillors technical concerns could all be addressed. They also said that the 4 a.m. closing time would actually allow patrons to filter out slowly over the last few hours, making for a quieter exit than usual. Police say that the Kingsway is not a residential area, while the club in question is in a residential area; they say this would lead to a sudden exodus at 4 a.m. that would cause noise complaints
The article notes that the nightclub was also turned down for requested music licenses for the second floor on Sunday nights and the ground floor until midnight throughout the week. The extensions would have been granted if the club had agreed to noise and occupancy restrictions.
PUBLICATION: Traffic World
DATE: November 22, 1999
SECTION: Air; Pg. 32
BYLINE: Kristin S. Krause
DATELINE: United States
Traffic World reports that Airports Council International is pushing United States airlines to phase out hush-kitted Stage 2 aircraft within three years. Most prominent airline associations are saying that hush-kitted planes -- which meet Stage 3 standards only marginally -- must be allowed to live out their useful lives. The International Civic Airports Organization (ICAO) hopes to have Stage 4 standards defined by September of 2001. After December 31 no Stage 2 planes without hushkits will be allowed to fly.
The article reports that Airports Council International-North America is pushing United States airlines to phase out hush-kitted Stage 2 aircraft -- which are marginally compliant with Stage 3 standards, meeting them by only four or five decibels -- within three years. True Stage 3 planes meet the standard by at least 20 decibels.
The article goes on to say that the most prominent airline associations are saying that hush-kitted planes must be allowed to live out their useful lives; this would mean setting phase-out rules that were based on number of flights instead of time, to be fair to cargo companies who fly less frequently.
The article notes that the International Civic Airports Organization (ICAO) hopes to have Stage 4 standards defined by September of 2001. With Europe seeking to ban all hushkitted planes, the U.S. seems behind. After December 31 no Stage 2 planes without hushkits will be allowed to fly, except possibly once: out of the country.
PUBLICATION: Chapel Hill Herald
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: Front; Pg. 1;
BYLINE: Ben Evans
DATELINE: Hillsborough, North Carolina
The Chapel Hill Herald reports that County Commissioners in Hillsborough, North Carolina are asking the state to include high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) carpooling lanes in their widening of Interstate 40 to six lanes. Many are calling for an even larger expansion to eighth lanes to avoid "building a bottleneck," but commissioners worry about the increased cost. Preliminary noise testing makes it appear that noise walls will not be deemed necessary as part of the project.
The article reports that County Commissioners in Hillsborough, North Carolina are asking the state to include high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) carpooling lanes in their widening of Interstate 40 to six lanes. The road is currently four lanes, and many are calling for an even larger expansion to eighth lanes, both to allow more effective HOV lanes and to avoid "building a bottleneck."
The article notes that the project will cost $71-million and will begin as early as 2002. County Commissioners want carpooling to be used as a preferred option to adding more pavement. They see the points mentioned above that support eight lanes, but worry about funding problems.
The article goes on to say that some noise testing has already been done, and no areas appear to have enough people impacted by noise to warrant a noise wall. Local officials also worry whether a planned school will be considered in the noise tests; the state says that it will, if building permits are applied for on time.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N1
BYLINE: Jesse Hiestand
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Gerald Silver, president of Homeowners of Encino and Stop the Noise! coalition
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that Los Angeles City Council members are getting pressure from anti-noise activists and airport supporters to reject the Airport Commission's proposed noise ordinance that will cap the number of Stage 2 planes that can be based at the airport. Anti-noise activists say noisy planes will still be flying in and out of the airport, while airport supporters point to lost revenue. This article is slightly more detailed than others about certain aspects of the plan.
The article reports that Los Angeles City Council members are getting pressure from anti-noise activists and airport supporters to reject the Airport Commission's proposed noise ordinance. The plan promises caps on the numbers of Stage 2 planes that can be based at the airport.
The article notes that anti-noise activists say that the caps still allow airplanes who stop -- but are not based -- there to land and takeoff thirty times a year, and allow planes stopping for repairs to land and takeoff at any time. The leniency was designed to protect the business of Stage 2 aircraft maintenance companies, but anti-noise activists say that the plan would allow Stage 2 aircraft to remain until 2010. They even maintain that they are so seldom decommissioned that they would stay longer than that.
The article goes on to say that airport supporters say that the plan would cost airlines $300-million and would mean the loss of 300 jobs. They also say that forbidding aircraft to use the airport as a base may actually cause more takeoffs and landings as airplanes land at the airport, but then takeoff again for another 'base' airport. They also point to a "Fly Friendly" program which will reduce noise at takeoffs and landings to around 100 decibels for Stage 2 aircraft and 90 decibels for Stage 3.
The article also says that airport tenants plan to challenge the ordinance in court if it's accepted; councillors say that the FAA granted them an exemption, allowing them to impose such rules without the usual exhaustive study.
The article notes that the council can only approve or disapprove the measure, and can not edit it. If the plan is sent back to the Airport Department, residents believe it may be 3-5 years before they even see another proposal. Those residents want to take what they can get.
PUBLICATION: Express and Echo
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: Pg.9
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Express and Echo reports that two prominent environmental organizations are showing their support for campaigners who want the noisy A30 in Exeter, U.K. resurfaced. Noise levels are up to 10.4 decibels louder than promised, and the pits in the concrete surface -- which allows for the noisy expansion of air -- is double the prediction. Both groups voiced their concerns at public hearings back in 1992, but were ignored.
The article reports that the environmental organizations Council for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) and Friends of the Earth (FoE) are showing their support for campaigners who want the noisy A30 in Exeter, U.K. resurfaced. Both groups voiced their concerns at public hearings back in 1992, but were ignored.
The article points to the fact that noise levels are up to 10.4 decibels louder than promised, and the pits in the concrete surface -- which allows for the noisy expansion of air -- is double the prediction.
The article goes on to say that evergreen trees must be used to create an effective noise barrier, as opposed to trees that shed their leaves. The organizations say they stand ready to show their support more strongly if the already successful campaign appears to need them.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 18; Metro Desk
DATELINE: Orange County, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that although the Orange County, California Grand Jury proposed a ban on leaf blowers earlier this year, only one locality has followed suit; one other requires registration of the machines. The columnist believes that the real solution is pressuring manufacturers to make quieter machines, or using the old-fashioned rake.
The article reports that although the Orange County, California Grand Jury proposed a ban on leaf blowers earlier this year, only one locality has followed suit; even then, the locality warns operators, and does not fine them. The columnist believes that the real solution is pressuring manufacturers to make quieter machines, or using the old-fashioned rake. It is noted that gardeners would likely take more time and have to charge more if they could not use leaf blowers.
The article notes that another community -- Irvine -- requires owners to register their blowers and take a class on blower etiquette.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 20; Zones Desk
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times prints an editorial which says the Los Angeles City Council should approve the proposed Van Nuys Airport noise ordinance. It says that like the "Fly Friendly" program which is voluntary yet effective, the caps on Stage 2 planes based at the airport would be a step -- albeit it a small one -- towards noise reduction.
The article prints an editorial which says the Los Angeles City Council should approve the proposed Van Nuys Airport noise ordinance. It draws a parallel with residents' distaste for the "Fly Friendly" program based on the fact that it is not mandatory; nevertheless, numbers show that it helps. They say that residents' opposition to a cap on Stage 2 planes that call the airport home -- on the basis that airplanes may still land while passing through or being repaired -- is similarly flawed.
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: November 21, 1999
SECTION: Virginia Beach Beacon, Pg. 24
BYLINE: Florence Greene Smith
DATELINE: Virginia Beach
The Virginian-Pilot prints several letters to the editor, one of which centers on airport noise at Oceana's Air Base. The writer questions several comments made in a recent letter by a retired military captain that suggested that noise from the base wasn't that bad.
"Reader disputes jet facts cited by retired captain
In a Nov. 4 Beacon letter, retired Capt. James P. Vambell attempted to dispel some "myths" about Oceana. Among them was the necessity to soundproof our homes and schools. I am afraid the captain doesn't have all his facts. According to The Virginian-Pilot (Nov. 16, 1998), a report was written for the Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Jay Johnson. It estimated 49,000 homes and 19 schools in Virginia Beach and Chesapeake will need soundproofing at an average cost of $30,000 per house and $1.5 million per school for a total of $ 1,528,000,000.
Capt. Vambell further states jet noise has never interrupted a conversation, TV or radio broadcast in his home. The Navy's final environmental impact statement says 47,000 people will live in areas with an average noise level of 75 decibels or higher. This is halfway between a telephone bell and a vacuum cleaner (Virginian-Pilot, Nov. 22, 1998). Eric G. Walter, Ph.D., atmospheric scientist and consultant to the U.S., declares that 75 percent of sleeping people will be awakened when exposed to a single event of noise over 75 decibels. Capt. Vambell must be one of the lucky 25 percent.
The last point disputed by the captain is that the Hornet is not a very noisy plane. In the final environmental impact statement, the Navy had reported that the F/A-18 is 20 decibels nosier on approach, than the F/A-14. This represents a doubling to quadrupling in perceived loudness.
The Virginian-Pilot (Jan. 14, 1999) reported that at least 120,000 Virginia Beach and Chesapeake citizens live in high noise or accident potential zones. About 28,000 residents lived in high noise zones before the move of the jets. Maybe this is why there are so many more letters to the newspaper about jet noise.
To put a broader view on our noise problem, The Virginian-Pilot (Dec. 20, 1998) related that the FAA estimated that by the year 2000, only 600,000 people in all of the United States will be exposed to plane noise of at least 65 decibels, which is considered excessive."
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 23, 1999
SECTION: Environment: Noise, Pg.07
DATELINE: Derby, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that a man in Derby, U.K., who played his TV so loud that neighbors could mute the same program on their own set and still follow the program, was fined 500 pounds for failing to heed a noise abatement notice.
The article reports that a man in Derby, U.K., who played his TV so loud that neighbors could mute the same program on their own set and still follow the program, was fined 500 pounds for failing to heed a noise abatement notice. He said he didn't know there was a problem because he is partly deaf and was confused by the notice.
Previous week: November 14, 1999
Next week: November 28, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index