PUBLICATION: The Cincinnati Enquirer
DATE: July 31, 1999
SECTION: Metro, Pg. C07
BYLINE: Amy Cappiello
DATELINE: Hebron, Kentucky
The Cincinnati Enquirer reports that the Northern Kentucky International Airport near Cincinnati plans to test noise cancellation technology to help reduce airport noise. The new technology picks up sound from a microphone and uses a computer to create a negative copy of it; when the negative sound is played back, it cancels out the original sound. While indoor applications have existed for years, it's never been tested at an airport or in other outside situations. Testing the system indoors and out would cost about $450,000, with funds coming from an existing noise-abatement budget.
The article reports that the Northern Kentucky International Airport near Cincinnati plans to test noise cancellation technology to help reduce airport noise. The airport, which serves 20 million passengers annually, already nearby residents soundproof and sell their homes. The new technology picks up sound from a microphone and uses a computer to create a negative copy of it; when the negative sound is played back, it cancels out the original sound.
The article notes that while indoor applications have existed for years, it's never been tested at an airport or in other outside situations; Officials at the Kentucky airport area awaiting results from a test at Baltimore-Washington International Airport scheduled for Labor Day.
The article continues, noting that the Airport Noise Abatement Commission is pushing to have the technology tested at the airport. A system intended for use in the outdoors has been recently patented by a California inventor. Testing the indoor system at a home would cost $200,000, and additional homes could be outfitted for $8,000-16,000. An outdoor system, which would cover a block, would cost $250,000.
The story concludes, noting that funding could come from an existing noise-abatement budget. In comparison to the size of the budget, the testing costs are low. In the last three years, 200 homes have been soundproofed with $5 million from the budget.
PUBLICATION: The Indianapolis News
DATE: July 31, 1999
SECTION: Metro West; Pg. W01
BYLINE: Bruce C. Smith
DATELINE: Plainfield, Indiana
The Indianapolis News reports that in a noise study performed for the Indianapolis International Airport, the airport authority has asked the FAA to require pilots to climb higher before turning over communities in order to reduce noise impacts. The new requirements would require pilots to fly at least 4.5 miles before turning. Planes would not only fly higher but would also keep to a narrower corridor instead of spreading out over several communities. Already, the airport has bought over 1,000 homes for $100 million in the area, and this year 380 more residents have been offered noise-abatement in some form, such as soundproofing
The article reports that in a noise study performed for the Indianapolis International Airport, the airport authority has asked the FAA to require pilots to climb higher before turning over communities in order to reduce noise impacts. Nighttime takeoffs from the airport's two North-South runways typically turn over communities after only about two miles, prompting noise complaints. The new requirements, which are expected to be approved by the FAA in September, would require pilots to fly at least 4.5 miles before turning over communities.
The article continues, noting that planes would not only fly higher but would also keep to a narrower corridor instead of spreading out over several communities. Already, the airport has bought over 1,000 homes for $100 million in the area, and this year 380 more residents have been offered noise-abatement in some form, such as soundproofing.
The article notes that since 1980, when the airport was growing rapidly, noise studies have been required every five years. In the last few years noise complaints have increased and so have lawsuits. The airport currently serves 4 million passengers each year. It is estimated that by 2000 there will be 300,000 takeoffs and landings, and by 2010 the number will be 435,000.
PUBLICATION: The Patriot Ledger
DATE: July 31, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 16
BYLINE: Gary Susswein
DATELINE: Quincy, Massachusetts
The Patriot Ledger reports that a $2 million construction of noise walls along the Expressway in Quincy, Massachusetts is scheduled to begin soon, 11 years after the highway section was rated noisiest in the state. 190,000 vehicles use the section of the Expressway every weekday. The article discusses the structure of the walls in more detail than most articles do.
The article reports that construction of noise walls along the Expressway in Quincy, Massachusetts is scheduled to begin soon. This action comes 11 years after this section of highway was rated noisiest in the state. Officials predict that the walls will allow residents to have a conversation in their yards at six feet without raising their voices; the current distance is only 18 inches. The project will be completed in two phases spread over this year and next year; no work will be done during rush hour.
The article continues, noting that the first phase of the project will cost $2 million. Senator Michael Morrissey says "If this small effort in any way improves the quality of life, this is one of the things we should be doing." 190,000 vehicles use the section of the Expressway every weekday, helping to make it the loudest section in the State.
The article discusses the structure of the walls in more detail than most articles do. The 8-inch-thick wood and concrete walls will be 8- to 15-feet-high. They will be filled with shredded rubber tires that dampen traffic noise. Foundations for the walls are steel and concrete; the foundations were begun last year, but delayed when workers found several large boulders in the way. The next step is the installation of wooden posts, which will hold up the ends of each panel.
PUBLICATION: The Arizona Republic
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: Opinions; Pg. B8
BYLINE: Tim Ernster
DATELINE: The Grand Canyon
The Arizona Republic prints a letter to the editor by a Grand Canyon hiker, citing the disruptive aircraft noise he experienced on a recent visit to the canyon. He provides a first-hand account of the aircraft noise that is often left abstract in articles about this subject. He supports a freeze of flights over the canyon.
"I read with interest the story Monday regarding noise from aircraft bothering hikers in the Grand Canyon ("Canyon flight freeze likely"). I just returned from one of my frequent backpacking trips to the Canyon and was truly offended by the obnoxious, invasive noise from the helicopters and small aircraft."
"We hiked the Ken Patrick Trail on the North Rim and camped near Imperial Point. We must have been in one of the flight corridors because helicopters and small aircraft continuously circled our camp from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. each day. Some helicopters were only a couple hundred feet off the ground and the noise was deafening. The constant "whop whop whop" of helicopter blades spoiled the peace and quiet of one of the most beautiful trails in the park. I would prefer a "smelly" mule train any day to the truly offensive noise of the aircraft. If the tourists riding in those aircraft would hike the Canyon or even ride one of those "smelly" mules, they would certainly have a much more enjoyable and memorable experience." - Tim Ernster Glendale
PUBLICATION: The Courier-Journal
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: News Pg.01b
BYLINE: Shannon Tangonan
DATELINE: Louisville, Kentucky
The Courier-Journal reports that the Louisville Regional Airport Authority presented preliminary data from noise-monitors to its volunteer Noise Compatibility Study Group. Some residents said that increased disruption wasn't reflected because "A machine does not live and breathe (the noise)." Noise monitors were placed in 20 locations; at one particular monitor, noise passed a 60 decibel threshold 117 times, often passing the FAA's level of 65 which is considered undesirable. Residents also noted that the flight paths looked like "spaghetti", raising the question of whether enforcement of existing flight paths could solve much of the noise problem.
The article reports that the Louisville Regional Airport Authority presented preliminary data from noise-monitors to its volunteer Noise Compatibility Study Group. The group advises the airport authority on measures that can reduce noise at the airport, and is meant to involve the public more directly.
The article goes on to note that this study was expected to be significantly noisier than the last 1993 study because new parallel runways have opened and UPS has increased its traffic since then. Some residents said the increased disruption wasn't reflected because "A machine does not live and breathe (the noise) . It just gives general information.... [All I know is that] I could pick a UPS pilot out of a lineup."
The article notes that noise monitors were placed in 20 locations; half of those were chosen by the consultants performing the study -- KM Chng Environmental Inc. -- and half were chosen by community members. At one particular noise monitor, noise passed a 60 decibel threshold 117 times in one day and night; 64 of those were between 70 and 75 decibels, and the loudest noise was 89.8 decibels. The FAA considers averages of 65 decibels, the levels at which 50% of people will be disturbed, undesirable.
The article notes that besides the noise data, the airport authority also presented flight path data; eventually, both types of data will be matched to create a map of noise impacts surrounding the airport. Residents noted that the flight paths looked like "spaghetti", raising the question of whether enforcement of existing flight paths could solve much of the noise problem. Officials say the flight paths are adhered to for the most part, and altitudes are within the required range.
PUBLICATION: The Jerusalem Post
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Rosalyn Harari, Somie Lemor
DATELINE: Kfar Saba, Israel
The Jerusalem Post reports on several issues in communities surrounding Jerusalem, including a political race, new burial options, and several issues relating to noise. A woman who entered a retirement home in 1990 has won a lawsuit against the home which has changed from a peaceful, quiet place due to a nearby long-term construction project that began in 1994. Also in this article was information about a drag club that is being forced to move. Residents' complaints of noise forced the club to close first at midnight, and most recently at 11 PM. Club owners feel they must move because they will not be able to bring in enough money with such short operating hours. Club owners believe that residents' real complaints center around the club's clientele, which includes homosexual and cross-dressing people. Officials deny the allegations, saying that the club has been operating without proper permits, and that a non-drag club in the same building faces the same restrictions
The article reports that a woman who entered a retirement home in 1990 has won a lawsuit against the home which has changed from a peaceful, quiet place due to a nearby long-term construction project that began in 1994. She paid a $40,000 entrance fee with the assumption that the solitude of the home would be preserved. She alleged that a construction project at a nearby overpass continually filled her room with dust and noise. Lawyers for the home claim that she wanted more luxurious surroundings and used the construction as an excuse. She was awarded NIS 170,000 in damages.
The article continues by switching gears to talk about a drag-club that is being forced to move. Residents' complaints of noise forced the club to close first at midnight, and most recently at 11 PM. Club owners feel they must move because they will not be able to bring in enough money with such short operating hours.
The story about the club continues, noting that the club owners believe that residents' real complaints center around the club's clientele, which includes homosexual and cross-dressing people. Officials deny the allegations, saying that the club has been operating without proper permits, and that a non-drag club in the same building faces the same restrictions. The club will remain open for several more weeks to allow the owners to find a new location.
The story concludes, noting that the club owners have tried to be agreeable to residents by installing an acoustic ceiling and caring for an attractive garden on the grounds.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 3; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Roberto J. Manzano
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Gerald A. Silver, president of Stop the Noise coalition
Los Angeles Times reports that the Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners passed a rule that would forbid any additional Phase 2 aircraft - noisier than the newer stage 3 variety -- from using the airport. Existing Phase 2 aircraft can remain, but must be phased out by 2010. The rule has drawn criticism from both sides of the noise issue; anti-noise advocates say that the remaining noisy aircraft will still be a problem, while airport advocates say the measure is more "anti-airport" than "anti-noise."
The article reports that the Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners passed a rule that would forbid any additional Phase 2 aircraft - noisier than the newer stage 3 variety -- from using the airport. Existing Phase 2 aircraft can remain, but must be phased out by 2010. City Council is expected to approve the rule next month. Two or three aircraft are phased out each year any way, so carriers won't be under too much pressure to change very fast.
The article continues, noting the debate over the rule. It has drawn criticism from both sides of the noise issue; anti-noise advocates say that the remaining noisy aircraft will still be a problem, while airport advocates say the measure is more "anti-airport" than "anti-noise." Commissioners say that noise restrictions were necessary, but time was provided to "give the industry an opportunity to figure what it wants to do."
PUBLICATION: Newsday
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: News; Page A08
BYLINE: Ellis Henican
DATELINE: New York City
Newsday reports that a pending law in New York City will make seaplane tours -- which fly 1,500 feet above the East River -- illegal. Regulation is complicated, since the federal government regulates air space, the city regulates the marina, and the Coast Guard regulates the water. Some unlikely allies have emerged for the company; members of a local Community Board were convinced that the noise is not irritating, and teachers at the United Nations School say that the takeoffs and landing is far from disruptive.
The article reports that a pending law in New York City will make seaplane tours illegal. A current campaign to ban helicopter tours -- which ironically is delayed because of technicalities -- has been extended to ban the far quieter sea plane tours of Manhattan that fly 1500 feet above the East River.
The article continues, noting that the seaplane tour company -- the only one in the city -- stays above the East River that it uses as a runway; "Any problem, it's always right there." Regulation is complicated, since the federal government regulates air space, the city regulates the marina, and the Coast Guard regulates the water.
The story notes that tourists pay $99 for a 30-minute tour in the seaplane. If the law is passed, seaplanes will be allowed to depart for other destinations, but tours of the city must stop.
The article also mentions some unlikely allies of the seaplane company. Members of a local Community Board came to listen to one of the tours, and most of them were convinced that the noise is not problem. Teachers and students at the United Nations School say that it is fun to watch the takeoffs and landings, and the noise is far from disruptive.
PUBLICATION: The Sun News
DATE: July 30, 1999
BYLINE: by Kathleen Dayton
DATELINE: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
The Sun News reports that several small communities near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina are being steadily surrounded by commercial development. Some residents don't mind, but many others are disturbed by light and noise pollution from businesses they say are too close to their homes. Residents have to deal with noise and light from fireworks, parking-lot maintenance, generators, and other disruptive sources.
The article reports that several small communities near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina are being steadily surrounded by commercial development. Some residents don't mind, but many others are disturbed by light and noise pollution from businesses they say are too close to their homes. One shopping and entertainment business shoots fireworks routinely, with residences across the street.
The article goes on to quote a 12-year resident who says that "When I first moved here, Broadway at the Beach was nothing but trees." Now her neighborhood includes two theme restaurants, Embassy Suites resort, and the aforementioned firework business. Others, living elsewhere in the community, contend with businesses that have noisy 24-hour generators or businesses so close that at least one resident constructed a berm to block it from view. One man who recently sold his house was disturbed by parking lot cleanings twice a week at 2 AM, dumpster emptying at 4 AM, and a parking lot that was lit at all times.
The article notes that a buffer zone is already mentioned in many deeds, but that stipulation has been ignored. One resident told a heart-wrenching tale of his 10-year old daughter, who was supposed to look at the moon for a school project. "It was hard to see the stars," he said. "That bothered me."
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: July 30, 1999
SECTION: Your Place; Pg. 3; Zone: C; Community Living.
BYLINE: by Pamela Dittmer Mckuen
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports on a Chicago Community Association which managed to address noise complaints with none of the traditional fights and lawsuits among neighbors that often accompany noise complaints. A two-year process of surveying, consultation with experts, and the institution of new policies have helped to quiet the building. Newer tenants tend to prefer sleeker furniture and floors which don't absorb sound well, and new rules that require more carpeting on the floors of each room and prohibit or caution against inappropriate activities have quieted the building.
The article reports on a Chicago Community Association which managed to address noise complaints with none of the traditional fights and lawsuits among neighbors that often accompany noise complaints. When the association began receiving noise complaints, they first surveyed their fourteen residents to determine what the disturbances were. Then they hired an expert to examine the building and make furnishing and behavioral suggestions. By following those suggestions, the building has become far quieter.
The article continues, noting that complaints included a nearby elevated train, an archaic elevator, and upstairs neighbors. The suggestions included more carpeting (80% of each room), rules against running, jumping, and bicycle riding inside, and suggestions on appropriate hours for loud appliances, stereos, or 'construction tasks.' The elevator was also tweaked to quiet its operation. They also are moving from leasing towards ownership of units, thinking that owners will have more long-term interest in cooperating with noise rules. The association pays for a portion of improvements such as carpets.
The story noted some reasons that the residences were getting louder. Older residents had more rug and stuffed furniture, while the more modern style of newer residents rests on hardwood floors sleek, unpadded furniture, and in-wall speakers. Also, an association rule that said 80% of the floor must be covered with carpet was interpreted to refer to total floor space, not floor space in each room as was intended.
PUBLICATION: AAP Newsfeed
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Nationwide General News; Australian General News
DATELINE: Sydney, Australia
AAP Newsfeed reports that Sydney Airport in Australia will be implementing its long-term operating plan which will spread aircraft noise more evenly around Sydney. The airport claims that residents will now bear the burden more evenly, while politicians representing the areas to be more affected claim that the changes have not been sufficiently researched and are an outrage.
The article reports that Sydney Airport in Australia will be implementing its long-term operating plan which will spread aircraft noise more evenly around Sydney. Eastern suburbs state MP Clover Moore, whose district will experience more noise because of the change, said "the claim that [the changes] have been successfully trialed is ludicrous and has been made without community consultation, environmental assessment or safety audit." Other communities will be seeing a reduction in noise, and are happy with the changes.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Florence, Alabama
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that Florence, Alabama officials have revised a noise ordinance to make it easier to enforce. An officer can identify violators by how far away he can hear their noise, instead of having to measure the sound with a special device. Violators will be ticketed up to $200; they will receive a ticket similar to a traffic violation instead of a full arrest procedure that was required under the old ordinance.
The article reports that Florence, Alabama officials have revised a noise ordinance to make it easier to enforce. The former ordinance required a sound measurement; the change will mean that an officer can determine a violation by how far away a noise can be heard. Violators will be easier to spot, but will receive a more reasonable punishment. Formerly, they were handcuffed and had to post bail; now they will be treated as traffic violators.
The article goes on to note that the ordinance forbids a car stereo to be heard five feet away. In addition, "offensive" language in music is prohibited. The ordinance is modeled after one in Montgomery, Alabama which stood up to a challenge in the state Supreme Court. 1,155 music-related complaints were made last year, and fewer than 12 ended in arrests.
The article concludes, noting that violators can be fined up to $200. Exceptions to the ordinance include church bells, emergency vehicles and equipment, bands, and construction equipment when used properly.
PUBLICATION: Canberra Times
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Part A; Page 4
BYLINE: Jim Dickins
DATELINE: Queanbeyan, Australia
The Canberra Times reports that the executive director of Queanbeyan, Australia's Canberra International Airport was cleared in court of making statements forbidden by the Trade Practices Act. The judge said that his comments, which condemned a planned development near the airport that he fears will block future airport expansion, were legal since they weren't made in the course of commerce. The judge acknowledged that the comments was misleading, since airport projections for 2020 place the development out of the areas most affected by airport noise.
The article reports that the executive director of Queanbeyan, Australia's Canberra International Airport -- who had been accused of making statements forbidden by the Trade Practices Act -- was cleared in court. The developer of a 500-unit residential development planned under the airport's north-south flight path had claimed that the airport official had made an inaccurate public condemnation of the development that was illegal under the Act. The Justice ruled that since the comments "were not made during the course of trade or commerce," they could not violate the legislation.
The article continues, noting that the official believes that future residents will be bothered by aircraft noise and work against airport expansion; he hailed the ruling as a victory for free-speech, saying that free dialogue with community members will be allowed to continue. The judge, however, acknowledged that the official had left out some information in his comments, including the fact that the development will be outside the areas projected to have dominant airport noise in 2020.
PUBLICATION: The Nelson Mail
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Collett Geoff
DATELINE: Nelson, New Zealand
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Cynthia McConville, community organiser
The Nelson Mail reports that Nelson, New Zealand residents, who were already campaigning against nighttime logging truck runs on Nile Street have widened the proposed ban to include all residential streets at all times. Complaints surrounding logging trucks have included noise and safety issues, made worse after a log fell from a truck recently. The logging company pledges increased safety but says they need to use residential streets. Residents plan to continue pushing the council, which is perceived in a cynical light.
The article reports that Nelson, New Zealand residents, who were already campaigning against nighttime logging truck runs on Nile Street have widened the proposed ban to include all residential streets at all times. Fifty residents, in addition to representatives from businesses and schools, attended a meeting from surrounding communities and unanimously agreed to introduce the proposal to City Council. Complaints surrounding logging trucks have included noise and safety issues; the latter was exacerbated last week when a log fell from a truck.
The article goes on to say that the logging company that is working in nearby Hira Forest pledges to further secure loads with canvas, but claim that upgrading their own roads to bypass residential roads would be too expensive.
The article concludes, noting that community confidence in the council is low. Counselors promised to conduct noise testing in the streets but residents are still cynical; not one counselor attended last night's meeting, although all were invited. Campaigners plan to give a petition and a formal presentation at the council's work committee meeting in the coming weeks.
PUBLICATION: The Northern Echo
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 6b
DATELINE: Darlington, U.K.
The Northern Echo reports that residents of Darlington, U.K. are frustrated with a neighbor who is cutting up vehicles and renovating garages, causing noise and dust in the neighborhood. The owner of the property, who leases it, has said he will check into the tenant's activities.
The article reports that residents of Darlington, U.K. are together in their frustrations with a local neighbor. Residents allege that vehicles being cut up, and demolition work inside garages, has been causing noise and dirt clouds since at least December. Wind sometimes brings the dirt, which sometimes gets on hanging laundry.
The borough council has asked the owner of the property to finish demolition work soon; the property is leased, and so the owner has said he will look into his tenants' plans. In the meantime, the council has said that residents should keep a diary of disturbances in the coming weeks.
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Local Pg. B-1
BYLINE: James W. Crawley
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Jerry Hargarten, chairman of Move Against Relocating Choppers Here coalition
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that because of a lawsuit settlement with San Diego, California group Move Against Relocating Choppers Here (MARCH), the Marine Corps is considering flight path changes for its helicopters. MARCH has suggested a more easterly alternative to the current northern route along the highly-populated Interstate 15 corridor. The military also has ideas, but a study considering noise, regulations, and especially safety will need to be done.
The article reports that because of a lawsuit settlement with San Diego, California group Move Against Relocating Choppers Here (MARCH), the Marine Corps is considering flight path changes for its helicopters. Currently, the Interstate 15 corridor is used, but MARCH has proposed an alternate route that would avoid highly populated areas. The Miramar Marine Corps Air Station has also suggested six paths, though they have not been released to the public.
The article continues, noting that while North County residents and politicians have complained about existing noise, East County residents are opposed to flight path changes that would increase the impact on their noise.
The article notes that the Marine Corps will have to study noise, safety, and cost factors of any flight paths before changing the existing ones. Though they are concerned about noise, safety will be the primary consideration. The lawsuit settlement mentioned above requires the Corps to study noise and pollution emissions; if judged necessary, emissions must be reduced.
The article talks about MARCH, which settled a lawsuit with the Marine Corps over helicopter routes. They hired two former FAA officials to study a more easterly route. Their proposed route would pass over some communities but would also avoid other by going between two communities, over a reservoir, and around a wildlife area; they have said the wildlife area could be given a substantial berth. The route would take 7.5 more minutes than the current one, and would affect fewer homes. Officials from nearby Ramona Airport -- which has no control tower -- worry that the route would be too close to their air traffic, but MARCH says helicopters could fly well above departures and arrivals. A more detailed analysis of the route will be undertaken by the San Diego Association of Governments soon.
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. C1
BYLINE: George Andreassi
DATELINE: Port St. Lucie, Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Hamilton Corey, vice president of the Property Owners of The Reserve
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News reports that residents of Port St. Lucie, Florida are concerned that a proposed roof truss factory may create round-the-clock disruptive noise. The owner says that no complaints were ever received at their other location, noting that the facility will not operate 24-hours unless a disaster such as a hurricane increases demand dramatically. The proposed facility will consist of a 71,600 square foot factory, an office building, and a 14,000 square foot warehouse built on an 11-acre property.
The article reports that residents of Port St. Lucie, Florida are concerned that a proposed roof truss factory may create disruptive noise. Residents fear a noisy, 24-hour operation with noise from saws and pounding nails. The group Property Owners of the Reserve plans to send a representative to the Planning Board when the factory's proposal is discussed. They maintain a cooperative attitude, acknowledging that the property is zoned commercial but asserting their right to express concerns.
The article goes on to show the factory's perspective. The owner says that no complaints were ever received at their other location, which is louder than the new factory will be. He says "We don't create any more noise than the companies that are there now," noting that the facility will not operate 24-hours unless a disaster such as a hurricane increases demand dramatically.
The company plans to built a 71,600 square-foot plant, replace an existing office building with a larger one, and make use of an existing 14,000 square-foot warehouse on other 11 acres of property. They will employ 75 at first, though that number is expected to eventually double.
PUBLICATION: The Times Union
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: CAPITAL Region, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Keri P. Mattox
DATELINE: Colonie, New York
The Times Union reports that residents in Colonie, New York near the Northway are petitioning the Department of Transportation to erect noise walls. Traffic on the highway has increased 5-fold since its completion in 1962, and over 75 people signed the community petition. The DOT has no current plans to erect noise walls, and says that maintenance, safety, and bridge projects will take precedence over the walls.
The article reports that residents in Colonie, New York near the Northway are petitioning the Department of Transportation to perform a noise study, which they hope will lead to the erection of noise walls. Since its completion in 1962, daily traffic between Exits 2 and 4 has increased from 20,000 to 105,000.
The article notes that the Department of Transportation has never built or had plans to build sound walls on the 176-mile Northway, which takes motorists from Albany to Canada. They claim that residents have always known they were moving into a 'highway area', although the very residents who obtained the 75 petition signatures lived there years before the highway was completed. The DOT says that maintenance, safety, and bridge projects will likely take precedence over the expensive noise walls, which cost up to $1.5 million per mile.
PUBLICATION: The Washington Post
DATE: July 29, 1999
SECTION: Home; Pg. T08
BYLINE: Patricia Dane Rogers
DATELINE: Alexandria, Virginia
The Washington Post reports on a home in Alexandria, Virginia that was landscaped to deal with traffic noise using more pleasant noise from water. The award-winning design includes two fountains in front and two waterfalls in back, together with berms scattered around the property and a stand of evergreens that help to quiet the property from the nearby highway. The use of water in sound abatement has double in the last ten years.
The article reports on a home in Alexandria, Virginia that was landscaped to deal with traffic noise using more pleasant noise from water. Two fountains flank a slate bridge over a pond in front, and waterfalls frame a lagoon-style pool in back that cost about as much as a basic in-ground swimming pool. Berms scattered around the property serve to reduce noise by as much as 5 decibels, and evergreens such as fast-growing Leyland cypresses help to quiet the property from the nearby highway.
The article notes that nearby man-made noise includes a busy highway intersection, a busy fire station, and a proposed hospital. The landscaper they hired wanted to take the project from their originally proposed 'babbling brook' into the much larger one described above. Water is a common 'sound baffle', and its use as such has doubled in the last ten years. The project won the National Association of the Remodeling Industry '99 contractor of the year award for exterior remodeling. The owners of the home say that being there is "instant relaxation. . . . You cross the threshold, and your whole body goes 'ahhhhhh.' "
PUBLICATION: The Courier-Journal
DATE: July 28, 1999
SECTION: Neighborhoods Pg.01n
BYLINE: Martha Elson
DATELINE: Louisville, Kentucky
The Courier-Journal reports that continued complaints about Lousiville, Kentucky's Phoenix Hill Tavern, which has been warned and cited over ten times in the past year, has spurred interest in a new noise ordinance. The article reports that the new ordinance will restrict outdoor music, and revise the current ordinance's vague description of 'unnecessary noise' with measurable noise limits. The tavern owner supports the ordinance, noting that he has already spent substantial amounts of money on sound abatement.
The article reports that continued complaints about Lousiville, Kentucky's Phoenix Hill Tavern, which has been warned and cited over ten times in the past year, has spurred interest in a new noise ordinance. A hearing on the violations will be held next month, but next week a new ordinance will be proposed that will set objective noise limits. Residents of three communities near the tavern -- fed up with noise, litter, parking problems, and disorderly conduct -- have proposed a vote that would make the precinct 'dry': a proposal that would affect at least two other restaurants/bars.
The article reports that the new ordinance could include a time to stop outdoor music. It would also revise the current ordinance's vague description of 'unnecessary noise' with objective noise limits -- suggested by the American National Standards Institute -- that could be measured by officials.
The article continues by addressing the tavern owner's perspective. He said an objective measure is "what I strongly feel we need." He has spent an estimated $100,000 on noise reduction already, including triple-paned glass for his rooftop open-air lounge. Owner of the Brewery is not impressed, and feels that the Phoenix Hill Tavern is receiving special treatment; the Brewery owner paid $8000 in fines in the last two years, after fewer citations that the Tavern.
PUBLICATION: The Indianapolis News
DATE: July 28, 1999
SECTION: Metro North; Pg. N01
BYLINE: Susan H. Miller
DATELINE: Carmel, Indiana
The Indianapolis News reports that Carmel, Indiana residents who live near the library's noisy air conditioner don't believe that the proposed ten-foot wall is high enough to effectively block the noise. The library will also apply sound-absorbing material to the wall and other surrounding walls, as well as reducing nighttime operation. Library officials maintain that moisture issues required noisy nighttime operation before now, and also say that the wall can not be built higher since the chiller needs access to a certain amount of air.
The article reports that Carmel, Indiana residents who live near the library's noisy air conditioner don't believe that the proposed ten-foot wall is high enough to effectively block the noise. In addition to the wall, sound-absorbing material will be applied to the new wall and the other walls already flanking the chiller on other sides. Engineers say that the wall can only be so high, since the chiller needs access to a certain amount of air to work properly.
The article continues, noting that some neighbors believe the chiller to be the problem. Library officials disagree, saying that they did substantial research and determined the chiller was the best one for the building. They are also looking into reducing nighttime operation; this wasn't possible in the first two months after construction at the library, since the chiller had to run on high to pull moisture from building materials and protect the books.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: July 28, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: David Reyes and Jean O. Pasco
DATELINE: Orange County, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that over 200 residents of Orange County, California packed a Board of Supervisors meeting to demand an end to plans for a commercial airport at the former El Toro Marines Base. Jet-Noise tests in June shook roof tiles and caused many residents to worry about safety and property values. The county's jet-noise expert was conspicuously absent from the meeting, as was noise data the County was supposed to have gathered at the test. Some residents of nearby communities downplayed the noise, noting that John Wayne Airport -- which may experience less traffic if El Toro goes through -- subjects them to more noise. Supervisors will decide on the project in December.
The article reports that over 200 residents of Orange County, California packed a Board of Supervisors meeting to demand an end to plans for a commercial airport at the former El Toro Marines Base. Jet-Noise tests in June shook roof tiles, and low flights caused many residents to worry about safety. Other residents are worried about how airport noise would effect property values, noting that "I have seen three 'For Sale' signs go up in my neighbor's yards. [since the test]."
The article continues, noting that while 700 residents had hurriedly gathered in a school gymnasium immediately after the jet-noise tests in June, this meeting was their first opportunity to formerly address the Board. One Supervisor from the Board's anti-airport minority was concerned that the county's noise expert was conspicuously absent from the meeting, and asked "Where is the data?" from the test. The Board will decide whether to go ahead with the project in December, when environmental assessment data is in.
The article mentions that several testimonials were from residents of Newport Beach, who said that noise from the tests were nothing compared to what they experience every day from John Wayne Airport traffic. This raised the issue that the decision to go through with the El Toro airport will affect neighbors of nearby Airports which may see a decrease in disruptive traffic.
PUBLICATION: M2 Presswire
DATE: July 28, 1999
DATELINE: Europe
The M2 Presswire reports that Europe's ECTS trade show will include 'noise police' this year. The noise experts will monitor noise and will be authorized to issue warnings, or pull the plug if warnings are not heeded.
The article reports that Miller Freeman, the organizer of Europe's ECTS trade show, will have 'noise police' this year to enforce noise limits. Attendance is expected to be high this year, and noise limits will help keep the din exciting but controlled. The Noise Police will have the authority to warn individual booths, and 'pull the plug' if they do not heed the warning.
The article notes that stands are bigger and louder than they were at the first ECTS ten years ago, when booths were 3 meters by four meters and there was "a bit of light opera over the PA."
PUBLICATION: The Patriot Ledger
DATE: July 28, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 13
BYLINE: Gary Susswein
DATELINE: Quincy, Massachusetts
The Patriot Ledger reports that a public meeting attended by over 50 residents and the MBTA illuminated two main resident complaints: noise and insufficient bus service to railroad stations. The MBTA says it will try to speed up wall placement, and will institute a pilot program to determine if more frequent bus service is feasible and necessary.
The article reports that a public meeting attended by over 50 residents and the MBTA illuminated two main resident complaints: noise and insufficient bus service to railroad stations. Residents praised the Transit Authority for clean, safe stations and timely trains, but contended that more sound barriers are needed near the Red Line. They also said that more frequent bus service to railroad stations is needed for commuters.
The article goes on to say that the MBTA has set a priority list for noise walls, and will try to erect them more quickly. Also, the 'top brass' at the meeting said that a pilot program will be established for more frequent bus service on the South Shore.
PUBLICATION: Roanoke Times & World News
DATE: July 28, 1999
SECTION: Current, Pg. Nrv2
BYLINE: Paul Dellinger
DATELINE: Pulaski, Virginia
The Roanoke Times & World News reports that Pulaski County's Board of Supervisors can't agree with the Planning Commission on who should take the first step towards a new noise ordinance. The Board referred the matter to the Commission but wouldn't promise to seriously consider adopting any ordinance that the Commission drafted. The Board is doing research into other ordinances. A local businessman pointed out that Pulaski is the only community in the area that requires citizens to personally obtain a warrant from a magistrate to address noise issues.
The article reports that Pulaski County's Board of Supervisors can't agree with the Planning Commission on who should take the first step towards a new noise ordinance. The Board referred the matter to the Commission but wouldn't promise to seriously consider adopting any ordinance that the Commission took the time to draft; instead, they are looking into other community ordinances around the country in order to avoid enforcement problems.
The article continues to mention a local businessman Pierre LaFlamme who is being disturbed by music from a neighbor proposed a model. The Board told him to "get his own warrant from a magistrate," but he notes that surrounding communities have passed legislation that protect residents form having to take personal action in such matters.
PUBLICATION: The San Francisco Chronicle
DATE: JULY 28, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. A13
BYLINE: Marshall Wilson
DATELINE: San Carlos, California
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that San Mateo County Supervisors promised at a recent meeting to try to reduce the number of touch and go flights that disrupt communities surrounding San Carlos Airport. They approved new flight procedures that avoid communities, and a voluntary curfew proposed by the local pilots association that would stop practice flights between 11 PM and 7 AM. Worried pilots who value touch and go practices were also in attendance. Members of Neighbors Against San Carlos Airport Noise want "pattern flying" restricted to 9 AM to 5 PM Monday through Friday, claiming that the Board's proposal, which would allow weekend flights, doesn't go far enough.
The article reports that San Mateo County Supervisors promised at a recent meeting to try to reduce the number of touch and go flights that disrupt communities surrounding San Carlos Airport. Supervisors will look into what authority they have to ban such flights during weekend mornings and evenings, and weekday evenings. Officials will also look into the possibility of installing sophisticated radar that could pinpoint pilots who ignore noise procedures.
The article concludes, noting what the Board did accomplish. They approved new flight procedures that avoid communities, and a voluntary curfew proposed by the local pilots association that would stop practice flights between 11 PM and 7 AM.
The article continues, noting that 'touch and go' flights are usually used by students learning to take-off and land or by veterans brushing up on their takeoffs and landings. Attendees included annoyed residents as well as some of the 400-500 pilots who value touch and go practice. Members of Neighbors Against San Carlos Airport Noise want "pattern flying" restricted to 9 AM to 5 PM Monday through Friday.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: July 27, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
BYLINE: by Paul Davenport
DATELINE: Surprise, Arizona
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that Surprise, Arizona's disagreement with state-required use of old noise contours from 1988 has gained support from the Pentagon. The newer, smaller 1995 contours will allow planners to zone more appropriately and avoid potential lawsuits from homeowners whose property value is lowered according to 1988 noise contours that show greater noise exposure than they currently receive
The article reports that Surprise, Arizona's disagreement with state-required use of old noise contours from 1988 has gained support from the Pentagon. State law requires the use of the older noise contours in zoning determinations around Airports and Air Bases. Surprise contends that the newer 1995 noise contours are more relevant, and they insist that they should be allowed to use them for making zoning decisions around Luke Air Force Base. In a letter to Surprise's mayor, the Pentagon agreed that using the newer contours was "prudent and rational."
The article continues, noting that the contours are used to reduce negative impacts to urban communities by allowing city planners to zone appropriately for the level of noise in a given area. The 1988 contours cover more ground than the 1995 version, and planners worry that using them would draw lawsuits from homeowners whose property value was lowered according to 1988 noise contours that show greater noise exposure than they currently receive. Since 1988, different aircraft and flight paths have been introduced to reduce the area of the noise contours.
PUBLICATION: Daily Record
DATE: July 27, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 6
DATELINE: Glasgow, Scotland
The Daily Record reports that a faulty fire alarm at the Hampdens in Glasgow, Scotland went off at 5 AM yesterday, awakening neighbors of the stadium with the cry of "Evacuate". The stadium reopened last May after renovations that cost 60 million pounds. The new fire alarm was part of the renovations, but the intentionally sensitive triggers appear to be too sensitive, and stadium managers have promised to look into the problem.
The article reports that a faulty fire alarm at the Hampdens in Glasgow, Scotland went off at 5 AM yesterday, awakening neighbors of the stadium. Speakers at high volume informed those within earshot to "Evacuate, evacuate," scaring many residents into calling the police with questions. Stadium managers apologized for the disruption, and promised to look into the problem. Firefighters found no trace of smoke in the stadium, and traced the alarm to a faulty system.
The article continues, noting that the stadium reopened last May for the Scottish Cup Final after renovations that cost 60 million pounds. The new fire alarm was part of the renovations, but the intentionally sensitive triggers appear to be too sensitive. New soundproof corporate boxes in the stadium were another part of the renovation, which are equipped with volume controls to adjust the level of the infamous Hampdens crowd noise.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: July 27, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. 1A
BYLINE: Brittany Wallman
DATELINE: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
The Sun-Sentinel reports that after years of noise from motorcycles, police have started to increase enforcement, using decibel meters to measure noise as well as identifying doctored mufflers forbidden by state law. They are working with city officials to change the noise ordinance to make that enforcement easier. Police have ticketed more frequently with 160 citations last year, but city officials say that number could be ticketed in a week. Noisy muffler pipes -- legally available as 'off-road' models -- add personality to a bike, and alert drivers to a biker's presence. Motorcycle noise is seen as a threat to the public, and many popular motorcyclist spots encourage patrons to reduce motorcycle noise.
The article reports that residents of Fort Lauderdale, Florida have experienced a high level of noise from motorcycles for years. Police have ticketed more frequently with 160 citations last year, but city officials say that number could be ticketed in at most a week of effective enforcement. Police have started to use decibel meters to measure noise as well as identifying doctored mufflers forbidden by state law. The police chief, after considerable prompting from city officials, is now working to increase enforcement and change the noise ordinance to make that enforcement easier.
The article notes that although it is illegal to have anything but a factory muffler on a motorcycle operating on the road, noisier pipes are readily available though they are supposedly sold only for off-road and competitive cycles. Motorcycles gain 'personality' from the various sounds that noisy pipes make, and many motorcyclists feel that to be safe, they must have loud pipes to alert drivers to their presence. Even the Harley's used by city police were discovered to have illegal pipes a few years ago, requiring their conversion. Some bikers leave factory mufflers on but drill out the sound-reducing components.
The article continues, noting that City Commissioners are worried about negative effects on the public's hearing and stress-level from the noise. Motorcycle numbers are increasing, and so are complaints. Some businesses post signs asking patrons to not over-rev motors to protect their neighbors, and at least one common biker hangout has hired an off-duty police officer for "Biker Night."
PUBLICATION: The Washington Post
DATE: July 27, 1999
SECTION: Health; Pg. Z22
BYLINE: Catherine O'neill Grace
DATELINE: United States
The Washington Post reports on the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, which is part of an ongoing campaign to educate the public about noise-induced hearing loss and how to prevent it. It discusses the hair cells in your ear responsible for hearing, as well as types of noise that can damage those cells.
The article reports on the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, which is part of an ongoing campaign to educate the public about noise-induced hearing loss and how to prevent it. It mentions the delicate hair cells which respond to sound waves and tell the brain what you hear, noting that they can be damaged by sudden noises like firecrackers or ongoing noises like daily subway clatter. Noise-induced hearing loss will cause a person to hear sound as muffled, and may make it hard to understand conversations.
The article goes on to note examples of noise that many people don't realize is dangerous. If walkman earphones are loud enough so people around you can hear the lyrics, you are damaging your hearing. Similarly, using a power mower for hours without ear protection can do damage to your ears. Damage can be begin with noise over 75 decibels; normal speech is around 60 decibels and traffic is about 80 decibels.
The article also notes that Americans are losing their hearing by the time they are between 45 and 64, almost twenty years earlier than previous generations. Ten million Americans have already suffered permanent hearing loss from noise. One suggestion is to write down all the noises you experience for a few days, and then evaluate whether you are exposed to too much noise and need to change your behavior.
PUBLICATION: The Arizona Republic
DATE: July 26, 1999
SECTION: Front; Pg. A1
BYLINE: by Richard Ruelas
DATELINE: Grand Canyon
The Arizona Republic reports that federal officials may freeze the number of flights passing over the Grand Canyon as early as January. Many of the 250,000 hikers and rafters that come to experience the wilderness of the park each year applaud the measure, but air tour operators claim that some of their 800,000 passengers will be deprived of that experience. The two-year freeze is meant to restore quiet to 50% of the park for 75% of the day, as ordered by a 12-year old federal law, and noise will be monitored throughout that time to determine how much quiet has been restored. The FAA hopes to meet the mandated goal by 2008. The $151 million air-tour industry stands to lose $25.5 million each year for ten years.
The article reports that federal officials may freeze the number of flights passing over the Grand Canyon as early as January to restore natural quiet to the park. Hikers and rafters that value the wilderness of the park for its quiet applaud the measure, but air tour operators claim that their passengers -- some of whom are too young or old to hike -- will be deprived of that experience. 71% of the people who visit the park say noise is not a problem, but most of those are people who never go deeper into the park than the rim; 40% of hikers and rafters in the depths of the park say noise is a problem. The freeze is intended to halt the annual 3.3% growth of the industry, giving the government time to develop strategies for reducing noise.
The article continues, noting that the $151 million air tour industry stands to lose $25.5 million each year for the next ten years, and some operators say their business will be cut by 90%. Currently, 250,000 of the park's five million annual visitors are hikers and rafters, while 800,000 tourists fly over the canyon annually. Once the freeze takes effect, tour operators will not be allowed to fly more flights than they did between March of 1997 and April of 1998. Flights are already banned within an hour of sunrise and sunset in order to keep these dramatic times peaceful.
The article notes that the freeze will be an attempt to comply with a 1996 Presidential directive and a 1987 federal law that calls for more than half of the 1.1 million acre park to be quiet 75% of the day. Currently, only 42% of the park is quiet for 75% of the day, and that drops to 19% during the tourist season. The FAA expects to reach the mandated percentage by 2008. The freeze will be instituted for two years, during which time sound will be measured to determine how much natural quiet has been restored; depending on the results of the monitoring, the freeze can be removed or tightened at the end of two years.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: July 26, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N3
BYLINE: Lee Condon
DATELINE: Burbank, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority in California has a choice today: buy land for a terminal that the city of Burbank may never approve or default on their agreement and face a lawsuit from Lockheed Martin: the landowner. Burbank has threatened not to approve expansion unless a curfew on night-flights is instituted. The curfew is undesirable to the airlines, and the FAA has never granted such a ban. Burbank is pushing for the purchase, and hopes that Glendale's representatives on the Authority will agree since most of Glendale's city council -- which has recently become more anti-expansion with the arrival of several new members -- has been pushing for a settlement to the expansion question.
The article reports that Burbank, California's Airport Commissioners must decide today whether they will buy land for a terminal that the city may never approve or default on their agreement and face a lawsuit from Lockheed Martin: the landowner. The airport made a $30 million deal with Lockheed Martin after its attempts to obtain the land by eminent domain failed. Since the city of Burbank, which recently reaffirmed its right to veto any expansion plans, has threatened not to approve additional gates at the new terminal unless a curfew on night-flights is instituted. Since the curfew is undesirable to the airlines, and since FAA approval of such a ban is anything but a sure-thing, Airport Commissioners may do better by waiting until after Burbank approves a project rather than buying land they might never use. On the other hand, Lockheed Martin may sue the Airport if they go back on the deal.
The article continues, noting that Burbank has long been opposed to airport expansion. The Airport originally wanted to expand its current 14 gates to 19, with the option for 8 more. The city will only allow the addition of gates -- and only two at that -- if a night curfew on flights is also imposed between 10 PM and 7 AM. A curfew like this -- which is designed to reduce the noise burden on the Burbank community -- has never been granted by the FAA; even if it was granted, airlines at the airport would rather stay with the current number of gates than gain a few more gates contingent on a night curfew. Since the airlines contribute to the pool of money that will go toward expansion with landing fees and taxes, it is important that the Airport heed the airlines' opinions.
The article continues, noting that Burbank's three commissioners on the nine-member Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority have been told by city officials to vote in favor of paying Lockheed Martin for the land. Burbank officials believe that to not buy the land while still remaining potentially vulnerable to a lawsuit over two gates is ridiculous; they think that two new gates should be worth a curfew. Burbank hopes that Glendale's representatives on the Authority will side with them since most of Glendale's city council -- which has recently become more anti-expansion with the arrival of several new members -- has been pushing for a settlement to the expansion question.
PUBLICATION: The South Bend Tribune
DATE: July 25, 1999
SECTION: Local/Area, Pg. D6
BYLINE: Marilyn Klimek
DATELINE: South Bend, Indiana
The South Bend Tribune reports that while some senior citizens at the Robertson's Apartments in downtown South Bend, Indiana are disturbed by street noise, others are not. Residents who are bothered cite a loud bar across the street, unruly patrons from the bar, motorcycles loud enough to set off car alarms, and outdoor concerts at a nearby parking garage. The outdoor concerts -- whose organizers have agreed to face the bands away from the apartments -- always end before 11 PM, and the bar owner said he establishment has been fight-free for over one year, though the article didn't address the legality of other noises. Some residents blame city planners for allowing a senior citizen community next to a loud bar, while they commend the easy access they have to bus service and shopping.
The article reports that while some senior citizens at the Robertson's Apartments in downtown South Bend, Indiana are disturbed by street noise, others are not. Residents who are bothered cite a loud bar across the street, unruly patrons from the bar, motorcycles loud enough to set off car alarms, and outdoor concerts at a nearby parking garage. They are kept up and can not read or listen to their own music in peace. Those who complained said they knew of about 30 others among the apartments' 65 that are upset by noise.
The article notes that the local ordinance forbids loud music between 11 PM and 7 AM "in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a distance of 50 feet from the building ... in which it is located." The outdoor concerts -- whose organizers have agreed to face the bands away from the apartments -- always end before 11 PM, and the bar owner said he establishment has been fight-free for over one year, though the article didn't address the legality of other noises.
The article notes that downtown revitalization has seen city officials promoting downtown entertainment, but there has not been a matching increase in law enforcement to reduce loitering and other associated problems. Residents value the diversity of people around the apartments, and easy access to services, but say that noise can be a problem. Some blame city planners for putting a senior citizen home next to a bar.
PUBLICATION: The Baltimore Sun
DATE: July 25, 1999
SECTION: Local ,1B
BYLINE: Edward Lee
DATELINE: Howard County, Maryland
The Baltimore Sun reports that noise from a dirt-bike track in the backyard of one Howard County, Maryland family is bothering neighbors. Zoning officials say motorbike tracks are not allowed in residential districts, but the family claims the decision would "unfairly restrict a family hobby" which includes "no commercial aspects." While in at least one instance the family has dispensed with the noise on a given day when asked, neighbors feel they shouldn't be required to 'call ahead' to use their own backyards.
The article reports that noise from a dirt-bike track in the backyard of one Howard County, Maryland family is bothering neighbors. Neighbors say there is no way to enjoy their own backyards with the constant noise. Zoning officials say motorbike tracks are not allowed in residential districts, but the family is appealing the decision based on the fact that the track is for their own use and includes "no commercial aspects."
The article goes on to note that two sons of the family race competitively, and use the track after school and on weekends to practice. Therefore, the family is also claiming that shutting down the track would "unfairly restrict a family hobby." The local homeowners association with 30 members remembers the family's help in a recent fight against power lines going over the neighborhood, but are still irritated by the noise. While in at least one instance the family has dispensed with the noise on a given day when asked, neighbors feel they shouldn't be required to 'call ahead' to use their own backyards.
PUBLICATION: The Columbus Dispatch
DATE: July 25, 1999
SECTION: Editorial & Comment , Pg. 2B
DATELINE: Columbus, Ohio
The Columbus Dispatch prints an editorial asserting that Columbus, Ohio's Polaris Amphitheater, which has drawn noise complaints since its opening in 1994, is still violating the local noise ordinance and should start complying. While many bands adhere to the 100 decibel limit as measured 100 feet from the stage, the amphitheater has refused to take responsibility for those who do not. Polaris had promised to build a 16-foot sound wall to block some noise, but has since rejected the idea as too costly and possibly ineffective. The author says this is irrelevant, claiming the real solution is consistent enforcement of existing amphitheater policies and the city's noise ordinance.
The editorial asserts that Columbus, Ohio's Polaris Amphitheater, which has drawn noise complaints since its opening in 1994, is still violating the local noise ordinance and should start complying. While the amphitheater draws diverse, well-known acts to the community, it should still be responsible for the limits which require sound to be below 100 decibels at 100 feet from the stage. While many bands adhere to the limit, the amphitheater has refused to take responsibility for those who do not.
The article continues, noting that Polaris had promised to build a 16-foot sound wall to block some noise, but has since rejected the idea as too costly and possibly ineffective. The city has not enforced the ordinance on Polaris because they fear that precedent may endanger other events such as fireworks or sports events. The author believes that if the city and the amphitheater would simply enforce existing policies, there would be no problem.
PUBLICATION: Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: July 25, 1999
SECTION: Health & Fitness, Pg. 1M
BYLINE: Jan Brogan
DATELINE: United States
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that our noisy society and behavior is causing Americans to lose their hearing at younger ages than ever before; 26% more incidences of hearing loss in those aged 45-65 have occurred in the last nineteen years. High tones are lost first, making it harder to hear consonants which carry all the information in speech. Regular exposure to sounds of louder than 90 decibels can slowly damage auditory cells, and sounds like firecrackers of up to 140 decibels can damage hearing immediately and painfully. To avoid hearing loss, you can wear ear plugs while at loud concerts or operating loud appliances or machines, and keep stereos lower. The article also mentions digital hearing aids, which can be two to three times more expensive but can also effectively screen out certain frequencies of undesirable sound.
The article reports that our noisy society and behavior is causing Americans to lose their hearing at younger ages than ever before. High tones are the first to go, and since they aren't required to understand most speech, the loss often goes unnoticed. Background noise can accentuate the problem. Consonants "carry all of the information in speech" and are higher frequency than the vowels, so people who raise their voices at those hard of hearing -- which tends to raise the volume of the lower-frequency vowels -- may not be helping.
The article continues, noting that incidences of hearing loss has increased 26 percent from 1971 to 1990 for those between 45 and 65. While 25% of those 65 and older are affected, loud noises from common sources such as cars, appliances, and music can cause hearing loss over time. While OSHA has limited legal noise exposure in the workplace, there are no limits in the rest of our lives. Regular exposure to noise of 90 decibels or higher can damage hearing.
The article continues on, saying that there are two main ways that noise can damage hearing. First, loud sounds of around 140 decibels --like firecrackers or gunshots -- can rip tissue in your inner ear and cause hearing loss in one painful instance. Second, softer sounds that are still over 90 decibels can damage your delicate auditory cells over time. Behavioral suggestions include wearing ear plugs or other protection while at rock concerts or when operating loud machinery like a lawn mower, and keeping stereos at reasonable levels.
The article goes on to discuss hearing aids, which now come in analog and digital varieties. While the analogs are cheaper -- $700-$1500 as opposed to around $2300 for digital -- digital hearing aids can filter out specific frequencies more effectively; this helps for noise like traffic, but can't help with noise of the same frequency as a conversation (e.g. background conversations.) Newer hearing aids that fit in the ear canal are less obvious, and people concerned with appearances are happier with them; one hearing aid doctor was quoted as saying "Vanity is the last thing to go."
Previous week: July 18, 1999
Next week: August 1, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index