PUBLICATION: Daily Telegraph
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 11
BYLINE: by Matthew Bond
DATELINE: London, England
The Daily Telegraph printed an op ed about daily noises apartment dwellers have to live with. Flushing toilets, shoes on hardwood floors, washing machines and crying babies were all examples of never ending noises that apartment dwellers are subject to.
The article stated that basically, not much can be done legally about these types of noise.
The House of Lords did not support tenants' requests to have landlords to install soundproofing to cut down the noise from neighbors' conversations, televisions, light switches, even their sex lives because they were everyday noises and not "deliberate nuisances."
The article said that London realtors are aware that noise has become an important issue and that legal action is more frequent. People are aware of their privacy, the article says, and noise is an invasion of it.
Soundproofing is a solid alternative to noise, but is expensive and must have no impact on the house value.
The article listed three organizations committed to noise reductioN: Association of Noise Consultants (01763 852958); Munro Associates (0171 403 3808); AMS Acoustics (0181 360 5988).
PUBLICATION: Daily Telegraph
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 12
BYLINE: Alexander Garrett
DATELINE: Salisbury Plain, England
The Daily Telegraph printed an article from someone who left the urban life for country life to get away from the noise, only to find unwanted sound of a completely different genre.
Nocternal animals, crowing roosters, combine harvesters and even church bells can plague country life.
The article also reported on the ambient noises of country living: chainsaws, barking dogs, and shotgun fire.
The article lists the number one complaint on country dwellers' noise-angst list is mechanized toys - scrambler bikes, microlights and remote-controlled model aircraft.
PUBLICATION: Austin American-Statesman
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Business; Pg. G1
BYLINE: Sheryll Poe
DATELINE: Austin, Texas
The Austin American-Statesman reported on people who live in attractive lofts in downtown Austin, and their love hate relationship with living in the middle of a city.
One of the disadvantages is noise.
Fire departments, nightly trash pickups, and taverns along the way are all examples of what some downtown dwellers live with, but eventually become accustomed to.
The article says that many residents say that's the price to be paid for living downtown, so no alternatives are considered.
PUBLICATION: Florida Times-Union
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Community News; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Alliniece Taylor
DATELINE: Jacksonville, Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Pat Lockett-Felder, city councilwoman
The Florida Times-Union reported on the delay in opening Angelo's Aggregate Materials, a concrete recycling plant because of dust and noise concerns.
According to the article, the plant can open provided certain conditions are satisfied. Among the conditions are noise control, limited hours of operation, and waste-control guidelines.
Plant officials claim that people will hear noise only if they are within 300 feet of the equipment. Officials also promise that they will spray water above concrete pieces as they are funneled into machinery and piles of material will also be sprayed constantly in order to control the dust.
The article said that the city council deferred the issue to ensure that residents are protected, according to City Councilwoman Pat Lockett-Felder, whose district includes the plant site.
PUBLICATION: Kansas City Star
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Zone/Shawnee Mission; Pg. 1
BYLINE: John Shultz
DATELINE: Overland Park, Kansas
The Kansas City Star reported that the Public Safety Committee of the Overland Park City Council directed the city's legal staff to find an ordinance that will limit the noise levels on car stereos in residential areas.
According to the Star, residents have complained that the loud "boom cars" have interfered with their sleep and televisions, and have even made their houses shake. Councilman Tim Owens calls the boom cars annoying and a public safety issue.
The article reported on the difficulty of enforcing such an ordinance, according to assistant city attorney Mike Santos. The city must first set a noise limit and then officials would have to enforce it because by the time police get a complaint, the car has gone.
The article said that options include measuring the decibels at a certain point on a resident's property and declaring a violation when any stereo-produced sound is audible at a pre-determined distance from a car.
According to the article, the research involves investigating existing ordinances in other cities, paying close attention to enforcement.
Olathe is one Kansas town that has such an ordinance, and city prosecutor Sue Dickey said the law has been successful, and few people have challenged a ticket.
Other Overland Park city officials think the solution lies with neighbors dealing with the issue because many times neighbors disturbed by car stereos know exactly who on their block is disturbing them.
PUBLICATION: Saturday
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. A17
BYLINE: Mike Kelly
DATELINE: Bergen County, New Jersey
The Bergen County Record reported that noise has become a secondary issue at Teterboro Airport because of a plane crash that killed four people in nearby Hasbrouch Heights.
According to the article, the majority of complaints about Teterboro Airport was about noise. Jets taking off or landing could stop conversations on streets, the article said.
The article said that the crash has prompted some local residents to concede that they have long worried about the dangers of planes smashing into their neighborhood.
PUBLICATION: Saturday
DATE: December 11, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. B8
DATELINE: Chesapeake, Virginia
The Virginian-Pilot printed the following letters to the editor concerning flights from Oceana Naval Base.
I have never written to you before, but I can no longer remain silent. My family lives in the Hickory section of Chesapeake and we are experiencing a life-changing reality.
We built our dream house on four-plus acres, and now these dreams are turned into nightmares. The problem is the excessive increase in jet flights. Because someone "showed Mayor Meyera the money," we in Chesapeake are being made to pay for those dollar signs.
It frosts me when I hear all of the uproar about the noise the jets generate in Virginia Beach and the commanding officer of Oceana tries to placate Virginia Beach residents by stating that he has spun the overflow to Fentress Field in Chesapeake. Well, excuse me, but Chesapeake didn't sign on for this.
Before we built, we researched thoroughly the air traffic patterns and noise zones. Since the arrival of the new jets in Virginia Beach, there are many nights when we can't sleep in Chesapeake. The commander of Oceana says that it's the inexperienced pilots who occasionally leave their patterns. Then why, when we are not in the flight path, do we have jets chasing each other over the top of our house?
Meyera's legacy to Virginia Beach turns out to be a plague on Chesapeake.
Mike Hickman
Chesapeake
A modest solutionto Oceana jet noise
Regarding the jet aircraft noise problem at Oceana NAS:
The solution is to build one or two new runways pointing in directions away from surrounding communities over mostly vacant land surrounding Oceana NAS.
How can runways be built at low costs, and who will build them?
The answer is in a recent AP article, "U.S. Soldiers reap rewards from mission of kindness" (in Kosovo, Yugoslavia).
Quoting from the article: "In 5 months, about 1,700 Army and Navy engineers moved half a million cubic feet of earth to erect two mess halls, a barber shop, a chapel, a store and a movie theater. There are also Internet access, recreation facilities and a helipad."
Why not use these same 1,700 Army and Navy Engineers and others to build new aircraft runways at Oceana NAS pointing in different directions away from existing homeowners?
The Navy was there first, but maybe they can help solve this years-old and never-ending problem.
Bruce H. Banks
Norfolk
PUBLICATION: AFX European Focus
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Company News; Government
DATELINE: Brussels, Belgium
According to AFX European Focus, the European Commissioner for transport, Loyola de Palacio, said that EU passed legislation requiring certain aircraft to be equipped with "husk kits" to make them quieter may be delayed until after an international aircraft noise conference in Sept 2001.
PUBLICATION: Friday
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 5
BYLINE: Tim Novak
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times reported that sound engineers will soon settle a dispute between a Cook County judge and his neighbors over noise from the judge's granite floor.
According to the article, tests involve "banging on the floors and standing underneath" with a computer to analyze how much sound is emitted by the granite floors would be conducted. Judge Melvin Cole is being sued by Ann and W. Blake Benjamin.
The article quoted Tannen, Cole's lawyer, as saying that the noises are not from the condo and that the building has a history of noise problems.
The article said the Benjamins claim the floors violate building rules and should be changed.
PUBLICATION: London Financial Times
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: World News; Pg. 10
BYLINE: Nancy Dunne
DATELINE: Washington, D.C.
The London Financial Times reported that the US may ask the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to revoke the voting rights of European Union States if agreement is not reached next week at the US-EU summit in a dispute over aircraft noise.
According to the article, the US aviation industry has lost two billion dollars because of an EU law banning the use of noise mufflers, or "hushkits", to reduce aircraft noise on older US-made aircraft. As a result, the US is under pressure from both the industry and Congress to retaliate unless a settlement is reached.
The article reports that Northwest Airlines and United Parcel Service claim the most losses due to having to sell their older noisier planes to third world countries. Companies have hesitant to acquiring older aircraft which will not be permitted to fly into Europe. In addition, Pratt and Whitney, who manufactures the hushkits has lost sales due to the ban, which has been delayed until next May.
PUBLICATION: Hartford Courant
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. A26
DATELINE: Hartford, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant reported that the state Department of Transportation will hold an informational meeting to discuss plans to reroute air traffic at Bradley International Airport. Any concerns townspeople have about noise pollution over their towns will not reverse the decision.
According to the article, informing residents about the decision and how noise levels will affect them is important.
The article explained that the decision has set residents from different towns against each other, but that the proposal will also reduce the number of people affected by the flight noise. The current route overflies between 600 and 1,000 homes in one town, but in comparison, the proposed route will impact an industrial park and 20 to 30 homes.
PUBLICATION: Journal of Commerce
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Transportation; Pg. 12
BYLINE: by Adam Entous
DATELINE: Washington, D.C.
The Journal of Commerce reported that the United States warned the European Union that it may retaliate against a controversial EU law that would limit aircraft noise.
According to the article, U.S. officials say the law restricts the use of older aircraft fitted with noise mufflers, or "hush kits," and discriminates against American manufacturers. EU officials say the law reduces noise pollution around congested European airports.
The article said that the U.S. will seek to strip the EU of its role in the International Civil Aviation Organization, and deny European carriers expanded access to the U.S. market, if the ban is not lifted.
The article reported that Congress also could retaliate by banning the Anglo-French supersonic Concorde from landing in the United States if the European rule took effect.
The article said that the U.S. asserts the law is discriminatory and has cost the aviation industry $2 billion before even entering into force by lowering the value of old aircraft.
The article went on to say that the EU argues " hush kits" do not reduce noise enough, and merely prolong the life of obsolete, polluting aircraft.
PUBLICATION: Orlando Sentinel
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Osceola Sentinel; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Tyler Gray
DATELINE: Kissimmee, Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: County Chairman Ken Smith
The Orlando Sentinel reported that one of three power companies planning to build plants in Osceola County are sheleved plans due to noise.
The article named Duke Energy of Charlotte, N.C., Dynegy Inc. and Reliant Energy of Houston as planning power plants.
The article said that plans where dropped for Reliant's proposed plant at the intersection of existing gas pipelines and aboveground power lines. The planning commission gave approval to the plant but reliant withdrew the proposal when it learned it would have to meet the noise ordinance.
The article said that residents from one town told planning commissioners that noise from Reliant's proposed 460-megawatt plant would destroy the tranquillity that that attracted them in the first place.
In response, the article said that Reliant officials claimed that noise from the plant would compare to the sound of a refrigerator running 10 feet away.
The article said that Planning Commissioners recommended approval of the project as long as the noise level from the plant did not exceed county noise standards. Reliant pulled its application and is now considering putting the $100 million plant farther from homes.
NPC Editor's Note: if it was true that the pant would be as quiet as a refrigerator, it would easily meet community noise standards.
The article reported that Duke Energy officials plan to address noise concerns with developers of the massive Birchwood project before a 500-megawatt plant is built. There aren't any houses yet, but the project is designed to bring almost 5,000 homes to Osceola.
"When we go into a community, we want input from folks who are part of the community, so you don't have any impacts in the community," Duke Energy officials said.
The article said Dynegy officials are also taking the concerns of residents and will get permits before taking their 500-megawatt plant proposal to the county for approval.
"It helps us to do our homework so we don't go into a neighborhood that doesn't want us," a Dynegy official said, and plans to avoid neighbors by building on Mormon-owned pastureland stretching across almost 200,000 acres in northeast Osceola.
The article quoted County Chairman Ken Smith as saying he would support electric plant projects as long as they did not disrupt the lives of residents.
PUBLICATION: Salt Lake Tribune
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Final; Pg. B2
BYLINE: Brandon Loomis
The Salt Lake Tribune reported that the Utah Transportation Commission rejected a plea from residents to tear down sound walls between Interstate 215 and Wasatch Boulevard in Salt Lake City even though residents hate them.
The article said that Utah Department of Transportation Director Tom Warne said that removing the walls it could set a costly precedent for the state's 26 miles of sound barriers.
The article said that many residents have called for removal of the walls because they obstruct views of the Salt Lake Valley. In addition, the article said that department noise tests showed sections of the walls reflected traffic noise into other.
The article said that the majority of people attending a public hearing on the walls attended to ask the UDOT to tear the walls down. The article added, however that some of the neighbors nearest the freeway said the walls were their only hope for peace and quiet.
The article said that people calling for removal that before their construction, the state assured them the walls would reduce noise for everyone.
The article said that commissioners said their decision to build walls was final, and that the people nearest the freeway and most in favor of the walls deserve the most attention even if they are in the minority.
PUBLICATION: The Straits Times (Singapore)
DATE: December 10, 1999
SECTION: Forum; Pg. 109
DATELINE: Singapore
The Straits Times printed a response from the National Library Board (NLB) of Singapore to complaints about noise the city's libraries. The article says that telephones, pagers, noisy visitors and talkative readers all contribute to the noise level.
The article said that in spite of the NLB's many attempts to quell noise, the level remains unabated.
The article listed several actions libraries have taken to reduce noise: forbidding the use of mobile phones and pagers, encouraging cooperation of parents, and improving users' awareness.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: December 9, 1999
SECTION: Citrus TIMES; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Jonnie C. Hale
DATELINE: Homosassa, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times prints several letters to the editor, one of which pertains to noise. A resident of Homosassa, Florida says that a boat ramp, for which restrictions have been proposed due to noise complaints, benefits far more people than it hurts. He says that the homeowners near the ramp knew it was there and yet chose to live there.
"Editor: Re: Officials seek solution to boat ramp problem, Oct. 13 Citrus Times:
Recently there was an article in the paper concerning the boat ramp at the end of Mason Creek Road. Apparently Paul Kunkel feels the boat ramp should be closed due to noise and rowdy people. I would be very upset, as a taxpayer, if this ramp was closed or restricted in any way.
The two property owners who are affected by the noise had every opportunity to investigate the ramp situation before purchasing their properties. My husband and I did. We didn't consider the lot next to the boat ramp because of traffic. The lot at the end of the ramp was on the market at a very reasonable price because of the near location of the public boat ramp. This should have been taken into consideration before they made a decision to purchase and build.
My husband and I purchased our home on Pinebranch Point 14 years ago, because of the nearness and convenience of the boat ramp. We chose not to live on Mason Creek because of the boat ramp. This was a choice, which everyone has the right to make. I believe to deny access to the many for the convenience of a few is not a good decision. To have a fence or gate to lock people out also would require a policeman or public works employee to be there in the evening and again in the morning to lock and unlock this gate. Is this fair to use taxpayers' dollars to benefit two homeowners who chose to live there? I don't think so.
I feel a larger Dumpster for trash, maybe a natural tree or plant-lined hedge to lower noise level and a sign stating that loud noise after 11 p.m. is prohibited would help. This way fishermen who put their boats in or fish from that point still have access. Every fisherman knows you fish with the tides, and a gate would prevent this access from this ramp for boats, and also for shore fishermen.
Dennis Watson, the attorney who is representing the owners, feels the only practical thing is to close down the boat ramp. This is nice for him to say, as he lives in Clearwater and doesn't care one way or the other about the residents of Homosassa, and it's not his tax dollars being affected.
I hope the county commissioners very seriously consider not being pressured into doing something that could adversely affect many residents and taxpayers to benefit a few."
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: December 9, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Dan Mccue
DATELINE: Jupiter Island, Florida
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News reports that at least one commissioner in Jupiter Island, Florida believes a recently passed noise ordinance is not doing enough to reduce construction noise. Although loud construction equipment is forbidden in the winter -- when most residents are in town -- and all work is restricted to between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., some are still bothered by hammering from construction.
The article reports that at least one commissioner in Jupiter Island, Florida believes a recently passed noise ordinance is not doing enough to reduce construction noise. He says that although loud construction equipment is forbidden in the winter -- when most residents are in town -- and all work is restricted to between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., some are still bothered by hammering from construction.
The article notes that officials have been waiting near the gate to the community to follow contractors. Several warnings have been issued to subcontractors who were not up on the new ordinance, but no citations have been given. Equipment banned during the winter includes "cranes, compressors, table saws, earth movers, metalwork hammers, sandblasters and other power tools 'that in operation would render the enjoyment of property within the town less agreeable.'" Any other equipment is also prohibited if it produces more than 65 decibels of noise at the nearest neighbors property line.
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: Clark County/Region; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Dean Baker
DATELINE: Clark County, Washington
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Fairgrounds Neighborhood Association President Bridget Schwarz; Henry Lasch, president of Stop the Amphitheater Today
The Columbian reports that opponents of a proposed 18,000-seat amphitheater in Clark County, Washington will hold a rally this weekend to increase public awareness and support. Stop the Amphitheater Today (STAT) has a lawsuit pending against the builders. Builders and officials say that the amphitheater's concerts are public and so are allowed to exceed the noise limits for private events; opponents say the concerts should be considered private. STAT is seeking earlier ending times, lower noise limits and an official environmental impact statement.
The article reports that opponents of a proposed 18,000-seat amphitheater in Clark County, Washington will hold a rally this weekend to increase public awareness and support. The rally will include sales of Christmas trees and refreshments to raise money for an organization opposing the amphitheater. The group, Stop the Amphitheater Today (STAT), has a lawsuit pending against the builders. The suit will be heard on March 31, 2000, and STAT members expect an appeal no matter who wins.
The article notes that the builders are impatient, and want to begin construction as soon as possible. They had wanted to have the $10.1-million amphitheater open by late 2000. Builders and officials say that the amphitheater's concerts are public and so are allowed to exceed the noise limits for private events; opponents say the concerts should be considered private.
The article goes on to say that STAT members want to stop, delay, or alter the plans for the amphitheater. Eventually, they hope to put so many restrictions on the amphitheater that it will not be able to hold concerts at all. Restrictions that are being sought include earlier ending times and lower noise limits. They also want an environmental impacts statements regarding the venue's parking lots.
The article notes that STAT members are confident, having had their suit examined by several lawyers.
PUBLICATION: The Courier-Journal
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: News Pg.01b
BYLINE: Shannon Tangonan
DATELINE: Louisville, Kentucky
The Courier-Journal reports that ten committees composed of airport administrators, customers residents near Kentucky's Louisville International Airport gave suggestions for noise-abatement alternatives at a recent hearing. The suggestions will be studied by a consultant over the next month. At that point, the consultant will present the practicality of the different suggestions. The ultimate goal is to send a final draft to the FAA in the fall.
The article reports that ten committees composed of airport administrators, customers residents near Kentucky's Louisville International Airport gave suggestions for noise-abatement alternatives at a recent hearing. Suggestions included designating certain flight paths, creating a public noise-monitoring office, paying for soundproofing of 2,000 homes in the area, and building three-walled 'hush-houses' to quiet engine maintenance.
The article notes that the flight path suggestion, which would have sent southern arrivals and departures to other runways in an effort to affect fewer residents with noise, was shot down because it was seen as simply moving noise from one place to another. The soundproofing plan drew applause.
The article goes on to say that the suggestions will be studied by a consultant over the next month. At that point, the consultant will present the practicality of the different suggestions. The ultimate goal is to send a final draft to the FAA in the fall.
PUBLICATION: M2 Presswire
DATE: December 8, 1999
DATELINE: Geneva, Switzerland
M2 Presswire reports that Quantum, a computer company, is now shipping the world's quietest hard drive as measured by an independent consultant.
The article reports that Quantum, a company manufacturing hard drives for desktop computers, is now shipping the world's quietest drive as measured by an independent consultant. Their quiet drive technology reduces idle noise to 28 decibels and read/write noise to 32 decibels; the nearest competitor produces idle noise of 32 decibels and read/write noise of 35 decibels.
PUBLICATION: Newsday
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: News; Page A33
BYLINE: Rick Brand
DATELINE: Suffolk, New York
Newsday reports that the Legislature in Suffolk, New York voted to introduce decibel limits in county noise rules to help cut down on noise on county property. Decibel limits are 50 between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. and 65 during the day. Several exemptions are made. The County Executive has 30 days to sign or veto the bill
The article reports that the Legislature in Suffolk, New York voted to introduce decibel limits in county noise rules to help cut down on noise on county property. Decibel limits are 50 between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. and 65 during the day. The limits are similar to town limits, but the county has become involved in an effort to improve enforcement after-hours when town offices are closed. Police will be an instrumental part of the enforcement, and the county has included $21,000 to purchase 21 noise-meters to be used in the area.
The article notes that exemptions include "power tools, lawn mowers and agricultural equipment" if they don't exceed 85 decibels on county property. "Construction and demolition work, emergency vehicles, snowblowers and plows, fire equipment and alarms, noise from noncommercial public speaking, assembly activities and municipally sponsored celebrations" are also exempted.
The article notes that the County Executive has 30 days to sign or veto the bill, and he has not decided how he will vote.
PUBLICATION: The Orlando Sentinel
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: Lake Sentinel; Pg. 2
DATELINE: Tavares, Florida
The Orlando Sentinel reports that residents in Tavares, Florida are still upset at the noise coming from live music at a restaurant, even after a noise ordinance was implemented three months ago.
The article reports that residents in Tavares, Florida are still upset at the noise coming from live music at a restaurant, even after a noise ordinance was implemented three months ago. Residents want a tougher city ordinance or some other action to reduce the noise that they hear. County Commissioners are looking into possible violations of the county nuisance ordinance, and plan to talk to Tavares officials about other possible solutions.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 2C
BYLINE: Ron Cassinelli
DATELINE: Narragansett, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that the Narragansett, Rhode Island Town Council approved a 10-point plan designed to reduce problems associated with rowdy parties. The council plans to move towards amending the noise ordinance as one of the steps.
The article reports that the Narragansett, Rhode Island Town Council approved a 10-point plan designed to reduce problems associated with rowdy parties. Many of the points are out of the town's jurisdiction because they apply to policies at the University of Rhode Island (URI) or require General Assembly authorization. The council plans to move towards amending the noise ordinance as one of the steps.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 1C
BYLINE: Richard Salit
DATELINE: North Providence, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that a Taco Bell in North Providence, Rhode Island has agreed to try closing one hour earlier for one month to address noise complaints from neighbors. During the new trial period, suggested by the town council and adopted by the restaurant, the restaurant may or may not dispense with a security guard they previously hired to keep the noise down.
The article reports that a Taco Bell in North Providence, Rhode Island has agreed to try closing one hour earlier for one month to address noise complaints from neighbors. The restaurant's drive-thru stays open until 2 a.m. on weekends and neighbors say they can't sleep.
The article notes that one month ago, the restaurant posted signs in English and Spanish asking patrons to be quiet in addition to hiring a security guard to handle problems. During the new trial period, suggested by the town council and adopted by the restaurant, the restaurant may dispense with the guard or not.
PUBLICATION: The Santa Fe New Mexica
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: Opine; Pg. A-9
BYLINE: Arnold Rivin, Suzette L. Binder
DATELINE: Santa Fe, New Mexico
The Santa Fe New Mexica prints several letters to the editor, including two related to noise. The first criticizes a recent editorial that characterized noise complainants as "fussbudgets", while the second criticizes owners of barking dogs.
"Boom-box noise deserves city's serious attention
Regarding your December 1 editorial on the noise ordinance and the "fussbudgets" (your word) who support the rights of the people to have peace and quiet in their homes: (1) Please do not compare noisy trucks and motorcycles with the cruisers and their boom-boxes. The trucks and motorcycles pass by and are gone. The cruisers and their blasting boom-boxes remain in one neighborhood (ours) for hours at a time. (2) If your editor were to spend a Friday or Saturday evening in an apartment in the 200 block of East Alameda, he would quickly learn what elderly people go through every weekend when they are subjected to the blasts and vibrations caused by some persons who wouldn't dream of doing it in their own neighborhoods. (3) If someone could convince the young men and women of the boom-box generation that they will lose their hearing by the time they are middle-aged, perhaps they would reduce the volume in their own self-interest if not in ours. (4) The police have tried to help. A very successful one-time recent experiment was to station a squad car with its lights flashing at the intersection of East Alameda and Cathedral Place during cruising hours. This was effective and we hope it will be done regularly. (5) Some of our City Council members seem to count noses in their audience instead of deciding what is right, not taking into account the fact that the great majority of the public can not attend those City Council sessions, especially the elderly who are most affected by the noise. .. but who vote. (6) It seems inappropriate for a newspaper to resort to name calling, e.g., "fussbudget," to describe a person who does not disturb the peace in someone else's neighborhood and wants the same courtesy in his own."
Arnold Rivin
"Dogs are worst
Regarding the Anti- Noise Ordinance, house party revelers are the least offensive offenders of the right to peace and quiet. Barking dogs take the top honors.
As it is against the law to telephone dog owner neighbors at 2 a.m. to ask them to take their barking dogs inside, I and many others are victims who cannot get a full night's sleep 365 days out of the year!
My only recourse against dogs who fight with one another and or who have sing-a-longs with the coyotes between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m. every night, is to get a coop full of chickens and hope that the dogs come on over to my house to take a look at them so that I can shoot them.
Now, I am not a dog killer. I have never even desired to kill anything. But I would hope that an ordinance against leaving dogs out during the night to destroy any peace there might be, would be given more than lip service.
One neighbor had two heart attacks, finally moved away, and died shortly thereafter. He never had any rest! I have heard bitter complaints against selfish, lazy, inconsiderate dog owners by people just like me. I finally barricaded one northern window in my room to stifle the noise. It isn't the answer. Barking dogs are owned by people who take little care of their pets. They need rest; so do I. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ."
Suzette L. Binder
PUBLICATION: Sarasota Herald-Tribune
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: B Section, Pg. 5B
BYLINE: Chad Binette
DATELINE: Sarasota County, Florida
The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reports that Sarasota County, Florida is appealing a ruling that allows a particular bar to play live music outdoors until 10 p.m. County commissioners claim that a special exception would need to be granted, but its not clear whether exceptions are necessary for daytime music. Another bar -- which together with the aforementioned one causes most noise complaints in the county -- is suing the County, saying its local noise laws are unconstitutional.
The article reports that Sarasota County, Florida is appealing a ruling that allows a particular bar to play live music outdoors until 10 p.m. County commissioners claim that a special exception would need to be granted, but its not clear whether exceptions are necessary for daytime music. One commissioner wanted to help neighbors temporarily by getting a court injunction prohibiting the music, but the rest of the commission did not agree.
The article goes on to say that resident complaints have caused county commissioners to attempt to address noise in the past, but residents are still complaining; commissioners want more enforceable rules in place soon. They have also asked their staff to research how other counties deal with such zoning issues.
The article notes that another bar -- which together with the aforementioned one causes most noise complaints in the county -- is suing the County, saying its local noise laws are unconstitutional.
PUBLICATION: The Seattle Times
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. B5; Letters To The Editor
BYLINE: Peter Cummings
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
The Seattle Times prints a letter to the editor relating to noise at the Seattle-Tacoma Airport. The letter acknowledges the fairness of spreading noise more evenly, but questions several aspects of the plan including: a turn that would be taken at lower altitude, and the absence of data regarding another nearby airport.
"I appreciated the column in The Times recently concerning changes in the Sea-Tac flight paths ("Sea-Tac air wars revisited . . ," James Vesely, Nov. 22). I agree with the concept of spreading the effects of the noise among our different communities.
I live in Seward Park, which, if I understand correctly, would receive more noise as a result of the changes. Although I am willing to consider accepting this as a cost of being part of the larger community, I do have a number of questions concerning the effects.
I'm not happy with the idea that planes making this earlier turn may make it at a lower altitude, which would seem to mean that the noise level would be higher as a result.
I also did not read anything in the article about the flight paths from Boeing Field, which is an additional source of noise that affects my neighborhood and is something that should be taken into consideration when determining "equal" sharing of noise.
It would be nice, but perhaps naive, to wish that these discussions could ultimately revolve around some firm facts and possibilities, rather than different folks trying to shift burdens along the "not in my back yard if I can help it" mentality.
If it comes down to politics and power (in the form of income), then all I see happening is a cultivation of cynicism, which ultimately diminishes us all, no matter who "wins.""
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: December 8, 1999
SECTION: Metro Chicago; Pg. 3; Zone: N
BYLINE: David Heinzmann
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that the Illinois Institute of Technology will build a noise-muffling tube around elevated train tracks as part of the construction of a new campus center. The 531-foot tube will be sheathed with concrete and steel, and should reduce the noise -- which can reach 120 decibels in the area -- to 40 or 50.
The article reports that the Illinois Institute of Technology will build a noise-muffling tube around elevated train tracks as part of the construction of a new campus center. A $9-million grant from the Illinois FIRST program will help pay for that part of the $35-million project. The project design, including the tube, was chosen as part of an international design competition.
The article notes that the 531-foot tube will be sheathed with concrete and steel, and should reduce the noise -- which can reach 120 decibels in the area -- to 40 or 50. Other buildings on campus, which experience noise and vibrations significant enough to limit the type of research that can be done there, will still be subjected to the disturbances. The project should be completed in 2001.
PUBLICATION: The Detroit News
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. Pg. D3
BYLINE: Katie Merx
DATELINE: Dearborn Heights, Michigan
The Detroit News reports that a waste-to-energy incinerator in Dearborn Heights, near Detroit, Michigan will be shut down from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. until plant operators install a baffle that should reduce the noise. Plant operators say that the noise is different than before this summer when a new furnace was installed, but it is not "shrill" or above noise limits.
The article reports that a waste-to-energy incinerator in Dearborn Heights, near Detroit, Michigan will be shut down from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. until plant operators install a baffle that should reduce the noise. Operators have eight weeks to make the installation, and community officials will reevaluate the noise.
The article notes that because the company planned to begin burning more trash, a third furnace was installed at the facility. Neighbors have been bothered by the noise since the summer when the facility was first brought back on line for a test after an 18-month break for renovation. Plant operators say that the noise is different than before, but it is not "shrill" or above noise limits; they say that complaints may be due in part to residents who got used to life without the noise while the plant was shut down.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Post
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Green Suzanne
DATELINE: Wellington, New Zealand
The Evening Post reports that business owners in downtown Wellington, New Zealand are worried that a proposed attraction called the "Sky-Screamer" -- a reverse-bungy ride -- would be noisy, and the city council has yet to grant permission for the attraction.
The article reports that business owners in downtown Wellington, New Zealand are worried that a proposed attraction called the "Sky-Screamer" -- a reverse-bungy ride -- would be noisy and cause traffic problems. The city council is looking further into the attraction before granting a permit. Attraction officials say that patrons don't really "scream their lungs out."
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 6; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Michael P. Lucas
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports on the booming business of chartered-jet companies at Van Nuys Airport. Residents around airports are opposed to airport growth at the expense of their neighborhood's noise levels. The Los Angeles City Council is considering limitations or an outright ban on noisy Stage-2 aircraft, but a charter company owner details how that would hurt his business.
The article reports on the booming business of chartered-jet companies at Van Nuys Airport. Much of the story is spent discussing the benefits of chartered jets for business people. One company owner breaks down the costs of using quieter planes as opposed to standard ones.
The article notes that residents around airports are opposed to airport growth at the expense of their neighborhood's noise levels. One activist said "The problem with the business establishment involved at Van Nuys Airport is they don't understand the word balance--the balance between the interest and equities of their clients and their airport interests and the community, the residents and the environment."
The article notes that one company owner said that financial constraints mean that small charter companies can't afford to use quieter planes. The Los Angeles City Council is considering limitations or an outright ban on noisy Stage-2 aircraft, but the charter company owner said that would hurt his business. "His rule of thumb is that a $350-million-a-year company can justify the expense of a standard GII jet, a $500-million company can own a G-III (which has a longer range), but it takes a $1-billion company to support a G-IV (which is quieter).
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Martha L. Willman
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Gerald Silver, head of Stop the Noise
The Los Angeles Times reports that the rise in corporate jet traffic at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles, California has caused a rise in rents and insurance for plane operators who use the facility. As a result, many general aviation (non-commercial, non-military aviation) prop-plane operators are leaving the airport in search of cheaper venues. Although the rise in jets based at the airport contributes $1.2 billion and 10,000 jobs to the local economy, the increased noise from the louder jets is driving residences to even more bitterly oppose noise from the airport.
The article reports that the rise in corporate jet traffic at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles, California has caused a rise in rents and insurance for plane operators who use the facility. As a result, many general aviation (non-commercial, non-military aviation) prop-plane operators are leaving the airport in search of cheaper venues. One plane owner will be moving to an airport in the desert 26 miles away to save $5000 of his current $8000 monthly expenses at Van Nuys.
The article notes that although the rise in jets based at the airport from 61 to 122 since 1986 -- which was accompanied by a drop in propeller planes at the airport from 836 to 538 -- contributes $1.2 billion and 10,000 jobs to the local economy, the increased noise from the louder jets is driving residences to even more bitterly oppose noise from the airport. Across the country, over 655 airports "are under threat of closure or severe curtailment because of opposition from community forces," due in part to the national growth of business-related general aviation. "Opponents are urging the city to phase out older, noisier jets and to put a curfew on helicopters."
PUBLICATION: Western Morning News
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: Supplement: Business
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Western Morning News reports that a woman from Exeter, U.K. was charged with two counts of assault after slapping two women who complained to her about noise from a party she was throwing. The hostess was "given a 12 month conditional discharge."
The article reports that a woman from Exeter, U.K. was charged with two counts of assault after slapping two women who complained to her about noise from a party she was throwing. The women represented a residents' board, but didn't live in the immediate vicinity. After the three shouted at each other, the women turned to leave and were slapped in the head by the hostess.
The article notes that one woman complained about headaches after the incident. The hostess was "given a 12 month conditional discharge." She claimed she had been drinking too much, and was exasperated with the complainants.
PUBLICATION: Western Morning News
DATE: December 7, 1999
SECTION: Supplement: Business, Pg.19
DATELINE: East Devon, U.K.
The Western Morning News reports that residents in East Devon, U.K. are upset that the government is spending 8 million pounds on roadside plantings designed to encourage wildlife rather than on reducing noise. A spokesperson for the government said that the money will go to roads nationwide, and that the resurfacing question is under consideration.
The article reports that residents in East Devon, U.K. are upset that the government is spending 8 million pounds on roadside plantings designed to encourage wildlife rather than on reducing noise. The Resurface the A30 (RTA30) group says it is "keen to encourage environmental initiatives and is therefore pleased to see... millions of pounds are to be made available to save wildlife..., however, we... feel that the human citizens of this country, if not given more priority over wildlife, should at least be given equal consideration."
The article notes that a spokesperson for the government said that the money will go to roads nationwide, and will improve the world for everyone. They also said that the A30 resurfacing question is under consideration. Noise tests are planned soon.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State and Local Wire
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Castleton, Vermont
The Associated Press State and Local Wire reports that a Noise Abatement Committee established at Castleton State College in Vermont has proposed a 5-point plan to reduce noise from off-campus parties. Residents and neighborhood organizations like the plan, but say it is too soon to know if it will work.
The article reports that a Noise Abatement Committee established at Castleton State College in Vermont has proposed a 5-point plan to reduce noise from off-campus parties. The committee includes students, residents, landlords, and college administrators. The plan -- called "Acceptable Citizenship Guidelines" -- will aim to notify neighbors about large parties and aim to reduce noise levels late at night.
The article notes that the plan is designed so it can be attached to leases. Residents and neighborhood organizations like the plan, but say it is too soon to know if it will work. Some residents say the discussions have helped already, probably because of better communication that isn't normally facilitated by anonymous complaints; this concern was addressed through emphasis of "mutual initiative."
PUBLICATION: AP Online
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Sports
BYLINE: Howard Ulman
DATELINE: Foxboro, Massachusetts
AP Online reports that plans for a proposed $225-million stadium in Foxboro, Massachusetts includes an access road for season-ticket holders. The road would help certain fans avoid highway traffic, but residents worry it would bring increased noise to their neighborhood. At a recent town meeting the stadium was overwhelmingly approved. The access road will be the issue in a later vote, and a two-thirds majority will be required to approve it.
The article reports that plans for a proposed $225-million stadium in Foxboro, Massachusetts includes an access road for season-ticket holders. The road would help certain fans avoid highway traffic, but residents worry it would bring increased noise to their neighborhood. Stadium planners say that the road is crucial to the project.
The article notes that at a recent town meeting, attended by three times more people than the usual 700, the stadium was overwhelmingly approved. That approval, however, was only the first vote in a series of six that will be required for the stadium plan to go ahead. The access road will be the issue in one of those votes, and a two-thirds majority will be required to approve it.
The article goes on to say that the road would be used for events where more than 50,000 tickets were issued, which would be approximately 10 to 14 each year.
PUBLICATION: Aviation Week and Space Technology
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Air Transport; Vol. 151, No. 23; Pg. 55
DATELINE: Seattle, Washington
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Dennis McGrann, executive director of National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment (NOISE)
Aviation Week and Space Technology reports that the National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment (NOISE) is working with a congressional representative from Minnesota to push the FAA to study low-frequency noise from aircraft.
The article reports that the National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment (NOISE) is working with a congressional representative from Minnesota to push the FAA to study low-frequency noise from aircraft. "Low-frequency noise is particularly hard to attenuate and control" and ever-larger aircraft could likely increase the amount of low-frequency noise coming from airports.
PUBLICATION: The Hartford Courant
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Town News; Pg. B2
BYLINE: Phil Lemos
DATELINE: Granby, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant reports that residents of Granby, Connecticut are upset over a proposed flight path change at Bradley International Airport that would increase flyover noise in their community. The state Department of Transportation proposed the change because the new flight path would affect only 20-30 homes, instead of the 600-1000 homes currently affected. A public meeting has been called, but anti-noise activists say that "They'll do what they want to do, but people should have a right to know specifically what's being proposed and how it affects them."
The article reports that residents of Granby, Connecticut are upset over a proposed flight path change at Bradley International Airport that would increase flyover noise in their community. A sharper right turn has been proposed for westbound flights -- up to 85% of total flights -- which is designed to reduce noise for 600 to 1000 homes in Simsbury.
The article notes that the state Department of Transportation proposed the change because the new flight path would affect only 20-30 homes. A public meeting has been called, but anti-noise activists say that "They'll do what they want to do, but people should have a right to know specifically what's being proposed and how it affects them." An airport noise committee, which includes residents from the area, have already approved the proposal. Local representatives say "The alternative to resolving a problem is to spread the problem around."
PUBLICATION: Journal of Commerce
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Transportation; Pg. 15
BYLINE: Daniel J. Mccosh
DATELINE: Mexico City, Mexico
The Journal of Commerce reports that Mexico plans to make improvements in its commercial fleet with regards to safety and noise.
The article reports on the grounding of a Mexican cargo and passenger airline after a fatal crash that killed 18 people. The crash accentuated recent criticism of Mexico's airlines regarding noise and safety issues. Mexico has announced that it plans to make improvements in its 87-plane commercial fleet, and is trying to raise the $174 million necessary for the project.
PUBLICATION: The Korea Herald
DATE: December 6, 1999
BYLINE: Choe Seung-Chul
DATELINE: Korea
The Korea Herald reports that the Ministry of Construction and Transportation in Korea agreed to a 68-decibel noise limit for a new high speed rail link. Noise walls will be erected along 14% of the rail line; some walls will be 2.6 meters high, but others will be less than two meters high to allow for a better view.
The article reports that the Ministry of Construction and Transportation in Korea agreed to a 68-decibel noise limit for a new high speed rail link. The Ministry of the Environment had expressed concern over plans for shorter sound walls -- designed to allow better views -- but the Transportation Ministry quelled those fears by agreeing to the noise limit.
The article notes that noise walls would be erected along 14% of the rail line. Some walls will be 2.6 meters high, but others will be less than two meters high. The rail company expects to meet a 665-decibel noise limit by 2015.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Patrick Mcgreevy
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Gerald Silver, head of Stop The Noise!
The Los Angeles Times reports that a new noise-abatement office will open at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles, California to coordinate the soundproofing of homes nearby. Residents say the soundproofing is just a quick fix, and does nothing to address the underlying noise problem or to help the rest of the community. A judge is set to rule on whether the airport deserves a variance from noise rules that could allow it to continue operating. The new noise office is partly an attempt to show that judge that the airport is making an attempt to reduce noise.
The article reports that a new noise-abatement office will open at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles, California to coordinate the soundproofing of homes nearby. 1,050 homes in the highest noise-impact area -- approximately one block surrounding the airport that experiences over 65 decibels as a daily average -- will be eligible for the soundproofing. Residents say the soundproofing is just a quick fix, and does nothing to address the underlying noise problem or to help the rest of the community.
The article notes that to be eligible for the $25,000/home soundproofing, homeowners must also agree not to sue the airport in the future over noise. Once a home is approved for the treatment, a competitive bid process will begin and work could be completed within 9 months.
The article goes on to say that the project will cost the airport $3-million annually for the next 3-5 years. The airport is paying for the first year of projects with general aviation revenue, since a noise study begun ten years ago -- that could bring federal funding -- is yet to be completed.
The article notes that a judge is set to rule on whether the airport deserves a variance from noise rules that could allow it to continue operating. The new noise office is partly an attempt to show that judge that the airport is making an attempt to reduce noise. The city council is also trying to restrict air operations, but is postponing specific action until it understands how far it can legally go.
PUBLICATION: The Orlando Sentinel
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: Local & State; Pg. C3
DATELINE: Holopaw, Florida
The Orlando Sentinel reports that a power company in Holopaw, Florida has withdrawn its application to build a $100-million, 460-megawatt power plant near residences due to noise concerns.
The article reports that a power company in Holopaw, Florida has withdrawn its application to build a $100-million, 460-megawatt power plant near residences. The company is searching for other areas further from residences where noise won't require them to apply for a variance.
PUBLICATION: Ventura County Star
DATE: December 6, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. B01
BYLINE: Dana Bartholomew
DATELINE: Simi Valley, California
The Ventura County Star reports that local officials in Simi Valley, California are planning to streamline their noise laws to assure quiet on the streets by 10 p.m. and until 7 a.m. The new laws would increase the role of police, who would give more objective descriptions of the excessiveness of noise than those currently given in court by furious neighbors.
The article reports that local officials in Simi Valley, California are planning to streamline their noise laws to assure quiet on the streets by 10 p.m. and until 7 a.m. The current noise law allows noise until 11 p.m.
The article notes that currently, noise disputes are commonly heard in court as a dispute by one neighbor against another. The new laws would increase the role of police, who would give more objective descriptions of the excessiveness of noise. Police would issue warnings before giving actual citations.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 18; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Evelyn Jerome
DATELINE: Santa Monica, California
The Los Angeles Times prints a letter to the editor that questions a recent editorial which praised the Fly Friendly program at Van Nuys Airport in Los Angeles, California. The writer asserts that an effective program needs to target aircraft not based at the airport, since 90% of the noise that is over the limits come from those planes.
"Cap Noisy Jets at Van Nuys," Nov. 21.
"The facts in your editorial about Van Nuys Airport are right, but the conclusion is all wrong! You say that "the numbers show that the Fly Friendly program works more times than it doesn't." You say that "some repeat offenders aircraft operators who exceed target takeoff noise levels have cleaned up their records," citing one who "has not received a citation since July." You say that "of all the flights departing Van Nuys since February, only 8.4% exceeded the noise limits" and you conclude, based on all this positive information, that "the glass is far more full than it is empty."
Your editorial didn't note, as I discovered when I researched the Department of Airports report myself, that of those who do exceed the target noise limits, only a scant 7.5% are Van Nuys-based operators. That means that only 6 out of every 1,000 takeoffs is a Van Nuys-based aircraft that has exceeded the target noise limits.
The Fly Friendly program is working. The noise contour has shrunk, with the footprint around Van Nuys affecting a smaller area and fewer people. This is clearly due to the fact that Van Nuys-based aircraft operators have made concerted efforts to fly quietly over the San Fernando Valley.
Why punish the people making the greatest effort? The Department of Airports should instead embark on a full-scale effort to educate companies that use Van Nuys Airport but aren't based here. More than 90% of the noise violations come from non-Van Nuys-based companies. We can reduce noise at Van Nuys Airport by educating those companies about our expectations. We can continue to soundproof homes around the airport.
Let's take real steps to solve the problem instead of forcing those who are making an effort to improve bear the brunt of unwarranted and ineffective regulations."
PUBLICATION: The New York Times
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: Section 14Li; Page 3; Column 1; Long Island Weekly Desk
BYLINE: Peter B. Boody
DATELINE: Westhampton, New York
The New York Times reports that residents around Suffolk County, New York's Gabreski Airport are pushing for a moratorium on new airport construction. Officials at the airport say there is no significant expansion planned at the airport, but pressure from residents who say the noise from the airport is growing.
The article reports that residents around Suffolk County, New York's Gabreski Airport are pushing for a moratorium on new airport construction. Officials at the airport say there is no significant expansion planned at the airport, and point out that air traffic was actually down to 83,049 takeoffs and landings, in 1998 compared to 93,213 in 1997.
The article notes that expansion opponents claim that 80 hangars have been proposed under an old master-plan -- which they say needs to be revised to better reflect residents' noise concerns -- while officials say only 30 hangars have been proposed or built. Officials noted that "traffic has been down at all general aviation airports since private and corporate flying peaked nationally in 1980."
The article notes that the moratorium has been proposed in the County legislature by a reluctant Democrat, but the Republican majority has kept the moratorium off the table. The democrat said there doesn't seem to be a big problem at the airport, but pressure from residents who say the noise from the airport is getting louder prompted him to act.
The article goes on to say that two proposals in the last thirty years for commercial expansion have failed in the face of community opposition. The recent drop in fuel prices at the airport has actually lowered the number of takeoffs and landings, since there is less incentive for pilots to quickly fly to another airport to refuel more cheaply before returning.
PUBLICATION: Newsday
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: News; Page A04
BYLINE: Michael Arena
DATELINE: New York City
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Allan Greene, Safe Aviation for Everyone
Newsday reports that noise from the supersonic Concorde jet, which uses JFK as its only American airport, has been irritating New Yorkers since 1979 when the European-based aircraft began operating in America. The plane causes significant noise, and some call it a "stretch fighter jet." It is specifically exempted from noise-reduction efforts because its engine design doesn't allow for standard noise-reduction technologies. Congressional representatives believe that the FAA should make the Concorde play by the noise rules that all other airlines have to follow.
The article reports that noise from the supersonic Concorde jet, which uses JFK as its only American airport, has been irritating New Yorkers since 1979 when the European-based aircraft began operating in America. After vehement anti-noise protesters tried to keep the aircraft out, they only succeeded in having Congress forbid Concorde operations between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
The article notes that the Concorde has maintained about 3 takeoffs and landings each day for twenty years as other air traffic has grown. The plane causes significant noise and especially deep rumbling, due in part to its afterburners that make it what some call a "stretch fighter jet." It is specifically exempted from noise-reduction efforts because its engine design doesn't allow for standard noise-reduction technologies.
The article notes that congressional representatives from New York believe that the FAA should make the Concorde play by the noise rules that all other airlines have to follow. Concorde officials say they have mitigated some noise over the years by limiting sonic booms to times when they are over water, and by limiting afterburner use near the shore.
The article goes on to say that a Concorde flight to Europe costs "$6,000 for a one-way ticket-for the 31/2-hour flight at speeds of 1,336 miles per hour."
PUBLICATION: Sacramento Bee
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: Travel; Pg. J1
BYLINE: Bee News Services
DATELINE: San Francisco, California
The Sacramento Bee reports that as of November, certain American Airlines flights have included active-noise-reduction earphones for all passengers.
The article reports that as of November, certain American Airlines flights have included active-noise-reduction earphones for all passengers. The earphones cancel out flight noise by generating sound with opposite properties.
PUBLICATION: The Union Leader
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: Section B Pg. 7
BYLINE: Roger Amsden
DATELINE: Canterbury, New Hampshire
The Union Leader reports that tomorrow, the lawyer for a group of Canterbury, New Hampshire residents will make his arguments against the expansion of the New Hampshire International Speedway in Loudon by 9,000 seats. Residents believe that environmental assessment has not been comprehensive, and that noise is a continual problem even though major events happen only twice a year. Track officials point to a $31,000 study that showed the expansion would create no increase in noise, but residents believe the study was too narrow in scope.
The article reports that tomorrow, the lawyer for a group of Canterbury, New Hampshire residents will make his arguments against the expansion of the New Hampshire International Speedway in Loudon. The proposal is for 9,000 additional seats for the 82,000-seat track, and residents worry that the planning board's approval conditions will not be enough to address their noise and traffic concerns.
The article notes that the residents wanted to introduce other issues not introduced in time -- such as the fact that the expansion violates the "town's own zoning ordinance limiting expansion of existing non-conforming uses to 25 percent" -- but the judge ruled that issues will be limited to noise and traffic. They also believe that a comprehensive environmental assessment has not been done top address local, rural concerns. Also, they hope to show that noise is a continual problem, even though major events happen only twice a year. Track officials point to a $31,000 study that showed the expansion would create no increase in noise, but residents believe the study was too narrow in scope.
The article goes on to say that the state Department of Transportation believes that nearby highways can easily handle the extra traffic. An access road which had originally been proposed by the planning board was approved this year and it helped to ease traffic problems at the track.
The article notes that 10 acres of wetlands will be filled for the project to free up 40 acres for parking. Track officials will build 12.4 acres of new wetlands, but will not pay for a wildlife corridor study as had originally been proposed. Another additional proposal was to prohibit additional wetlands projects in the area, but that idea was dropped. 175 acres will be designated under a permanent conservation easement, and further expansion will be prohibited until a 10-year development plan is presented.
The article notes that residents question the biases of the planning board, since many of them received free tickets to the racetrack.
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: December 5, 1999
SECTION: Commentary, Pg. J4, Objection!
DATELINE: Virginia Beach, Virginia
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: John Shick, of Concerned Citizens Against Jet Noise
The Virginian-Pilot prints three letters to the editor on the subject of jet noise from Virginia Beach's Oceana Naval Base. They all support the military jets, and criticize the paper for emphasizing opposition from anti-noise groups.
"Our civic league has no complaints
Your story "A noisy neighbor" stressed the negative opinions of the noisy minority in your headlines and opening. The opinion of the majority appeared on page A4.
You quote John Shick, of Concerned Citizens Against Jet Noise, as saying that "the jets' roar can adversely affect people's health."
Not only did you fail to quantify that effect but you forgot to mention Mr. Shick's qualifications to come to such a conclusion.
During regular meetings of the Princess Anne Plaza Civic League, our membership was asked - on three different occasions during the past year - if we should object to the jet noise. Each time, no member spoke against the jet noise.
Your article makes me wonder how you selected those citizens you interviewed.
Steven Sokolowski
President
Princess Anne Plaza Civic League
Virginia Beach"
"How quickly we forget Kosovo and Iraq
Your "Noisy neighbor" story, about the Navy jets, angers me. Obviously you have not served in the military nor have you been exposed to the calamities that are happening around the world. How quickly you forget Kosovo and Iraq. Your newspaper is in bad taste to make an issue of the American warfighter.
Groups like the Concerned Citizens Against Jet Noise are just another sniveling collection of whiners. Many live in their own dream world, supporting all the NIMBY (not in my back yard) movements that come along. Why don't they give up a few of their luxuries, buy a travel ticket and look at some of the countries that depend on us for their freedom?
H. Jack Ganse
Virginia Beach"
"Where's home? Just follow the jet noise
I read the Pilot On-Line article about the people complaining about the jet noise and I don't understand what their problem is. They want the economic boost that the extra people bring.
I live in Landstown Meadows and the planes fly right over our house. When I was stationed in Arizona, I missed hearing them.
That's how I know I am home - the jets. People should find something better to do than complain.
Joseph J. Smith
Virginia Beach"
Previous week: November 28, 1999
Next week: December 12, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index