NERC 88/30

JUNE 1988

EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT NOISE AND SONIC BOOMS ON FISH AND WILDLIFE: RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENDANGERED SPECIES AND ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICES, REFUGES, HATCHERIES, AND RESEARCH CENTERS

 

 

Fish and Wildlife Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


NERC-88/30

June 1988

EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT NOISE AND SONIC BOOMS ON FISH AND WILDLIFE

RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENDANGERED SPECIES AND ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICES, REFUGES, HATCHERIES, AND RESEARCH CENTERS

Douglas N. Gladwin
Duane A. Asherin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Ecology Research Center
2627 Redwing Road
Fort Collins, CO 80526

and

Karen M. Manci
TGS Technology, Inc.
2627 Redwing Road
Fort Collins, CO 80526

 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Ecology Research Center
Fort Collins, CO 80526-2899

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Suggested citation:

Gladwin, D.N., D.A. Asherin, and K.M. Manci. 1987. Effects of aircraft noise and sonic booms on fish and wildlife: results of a survey of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species and Ecological Services Field Offices, Refuges, Hatcheries, and Research Centers. NERC-88/30. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., National Ecology Research Center, Fort Collins, CO. 24 pp.

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


PREFACE

This report was produced as the result of a cooperative research project between the National Ecology Research Center, Ft. Collins, Colorado and the Air Force Engineering and Services Center, Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on the effects of aircraft noise and sonic boom on animals. The effort was funded by the Air Force's Noise and Sonic Boom Impact Technology program, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

iii

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


INTRODUCTION

The National Ecology Research Center (Center), as part of an ongoing research study on the effects of low-altitude aircraft operations on fish and wildlife, conducted a survey in January 1987 of all U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) regional directors, research center directors, Ecological Services and Endangered Species field offices supervisors, refuge managers, and hatchery managers. The objective of the survey was to determine the nature and extent of aircraft-induced impacts on fish and wildlife species, populations, and habitat utilization.

Because many Service field installations are located near military and civilian airports and flight training areas, the results of the survey could be useful to Service personnel who must comment on proposed flight operations and for evaluating habitat in such areas. The field installation managers and biologists were asked to provide background information or data on fish and wildlife reactions to low-altitude aircraft disturbances, including physiological, behavioral, and reproductive/population effects. The survey stressed that because of the current lack of information on the effects of aircraft on fish and wildlife, any type of information the respondent could supply would be of interest.

Specifically, the survey asked for information such as:

(1) observations of animal reaction(s) to aircraft operations, e.g., desert bighorn sheep scare behavior in response to aircraft overflights or hatchery fish seizures and death following intense sonic booms;

(2) instances of areas where aircraft noise is known or believed to be responsible for reduced population size, e.g., areas along heavily used aircraft flight corridors where breeding waterfowl densities are lower than in similar habitat away from the noise area;

(3) descriptions of areas or sites where adequate background data on wildlife habitat and populations are available to compare impacted and nonimpacted sites;

(4) any other data or information that might be relevant or helpful in determining the direction and design of future aircraft impact studies; and

(5) expression of the importance of aircraft/wildlife impact information to the Service.

The 132 responses varied from no known adverse aircraft-induced effects on a given refuge or hatchery, to waterfowl leaving an area due to the presence of low-altitude aircraft overflights, to the death of fish at a hatchery due to intense sonic booms.

1

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Survey responses that contained information on the effects of aircraft on fish and wildlife were entered into a data base (Table 1 and Appendix 1), using the QUICKTEXT data base management system (Osborn and Strong 1984). QUICKTEXT is a user-friendly data management system that permits easy selection of keywords in fields to sort, list, and summarize responses by region, State, year, agency, location, type of aircraft, animal group, and problem/issue descriptors.

DATA BASE SUMMARY

Multiple responses from separate personnel came from Aransas National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) (6 responses), Bombay Hook NWR (2), Sacramento NWR (2), and Wichita Mountains NWR (2). Approximately 24% of the responding installations were in Region l, 23% in Region 2, 20% in Region 4, and less than 10% each in the other Service regions. The data base contains information received from installations in 30 States. The States with the highest number of installations reporting aircraft disturbance were Texas (11 installations), California (6), Nevada (5), Alaska (4), and North Carolina (4).

 

Table 1. Aircraft/wildlife impacts data base fields.

Field no.

Fieldname

Description

1

ITEM #

Assigned by QUICKTEXT.

2

REGION

Service region of installation.

3

STATE

State of installation.

4

YEAR

Year of response.

5

AGENCY

Government agency responding to survey (at present, data base only contains Service code).

6

LOCATION

Name of installation.

7

AIRCRAFT

Type of aircraft causing disturbance (e.g., MILITARY, COMMERCIAL HELICOPTER, SMALL JET).

8

ANIMAL

Animal group(s) being disturbed (e.g., BIRDS, WATERFOWL, UNGULATES).

9

ISSUE

Short description of problem(s)/ issue(s) .

2

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Aircraft causing disturbances at the installations were classified as military (60% of the installations), private (44%), and commercial (37%). Helicopters caused disturbance at 70% of the installations, small jets at 59%, small propeller aircraft at 50%, and large jets at 31%.

Installations reported a variety of birds, mammals, and fish disturbed by aircraft operations (Table 2).

Table 2. Animal groups reported by installations as being potentially affected by low-altitude aircraft operations.

Installations Reporting

Animal Group

Number

Percent

Birds

63

90

Waterfowl

44

63

Raptors

12

17

Shorebirds

8

11

Colonial nesting

7

10

Upland game

6

9

Waterbirds (e.g., cranes)

3

4

Seabirds

3

4

Cavity-nesting

1

1

Passerines

1

1

Other (unspecified)

7

10

Mammals

14

20

Ungulates

12

17

Marine mammals

1

1

Bats

1

1

Fish

5

7

3

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


 

DISCUSSION

The problem of aircraft disturbance to fish and wildlife exists over a wide geographic area. Various types of military, commercial, and private aircraft have been responsible for disturbing wildlife on and near Service installations. Several reports stated that helicopters appear to cause a greater flight/fright response in wildlife than fixed-wing aircraft. Waterfowl were by far the most frequently reported animal group disturbed by aircraft. Several installations reported that some species of waterfowl were completely driven off refuges by frequent aircraft activity (e.g., Texas Point NWR). Waterfowl are an extremely visible group of birds, and the incidence of reports of disturbance may be a reflection of this as well as the apparent greater sensitivity of the group to aircraft disturbance. Clearly, additional research is needed to determine if more secretive, less conspicuous bird species also are being adversely affected by aircraft.

The reported impacts on wildlife range from minor behavioral responses to severe changes in the use of an area (e.g., Texas Point NWR). Information on the relationship of the observed reactions to physiologic, population, and reproductive effects for most species and situations is currently unknown.

Several installations reported extreme aircraft disturbance to colonial nesting species. For example, the only United States colony of magnificent frigatebirds (Fregata magnificens) may be declining due to frequent low-altitude overflights by tour planes at Key West NWR. In addition, low-altitude military overflights are believed to be causing the endangered palila bird (Psittirostra bailleui) of Hawaii to underutilize a sizable portion of its critical habitat.

Several installations reported that low-altitude aircraft have caused ungulates to stampede [e.g., desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) at Desert NWR and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) at Hart Mountain NWR and Sheldon NWR]. Concern was expressed for potential adverse effects of low-altitude aircraft over fawning/calving grounds [e.g., endangered Sonoran pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis) at Cabeza Prieta NWR and barren ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus) at Selawik NWR].

Service refuges and Ecological Services and Endangered Species field offices currently lack an adequate knowledge base on the effects of low-altitude aircraft on fish and wildlife, and are consequently making assessments of the potential effects of proposed flight areas based on inadequate information. Field installation managers expressed a high level of frustration at their helplessness to stop or modify proposed projects that would increase the level of aircraft disturbance at or near their installations. Virtually all field installations responding to the survey expressed support for further research on the effects of aircraft noise and sonic booms on fish and wildlife. At this point, the number of other Service field installations that have aircraft problems, but failed to respond to the survey, is unknown.

 4

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


RECOMMENDATIONS

The following recommendations are made based on the survey results.

l. A formal mechanism should be established for refuges by which the majority of airspace intrusions and resultant animal responses can be documented. Violations of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) recommended 2,000 ft minimum flight altitude above ground level needs to be reported to the FAA for private and commercial aircraft, and to the military base of origin for military aircraft. Photographing the intruding aircraft may be necessary to document approximate height above ground level and to identify the aircraft for reporting purposes. Ideally, the sound level should be recorded using sound level meters, and animal responses should be quantified to the extent possible. For example, a report should contain information similar to the following: "A single pass over a refuge by a military aircraft bearing the letter designation HL (Hill Air Force Base, Utah) at approximately 200 ft above ground level at 1 p.m. on 2 July 1987 created a peak noise level of 105 decibels and caused virtually all refuge waterfowl to leave the area for approximately 2 hours." The documented complaint should be reported to the appropriate Commanding Officer at the base causing the violation and to the FAA. Some Service refuges are currently employing such a reporting system.

2. Because many of the Service field installations responding to the survey reported a lack of sufficient information on aircraft impacts when called upon to comment on proposed flight operations, all Service refuges and Ecological Services and Endangered Species field offices should be provided with a copy of the joint Center/Air Force publication entitled "Effects of Aircraft Noise and Sonic Booms on Domestic Animals and Wildlife."

3. A central clearinghouse for aircraft/wildlife impacts information should be established.

4. A follow-up study to this preliminary survey should be conducted to gather additional information from Service field installations. The results should be analyzed and summarized in a report similar to, but more detailed than, this one.

5. Service field installations should develop better working relations with airport operators, the FAA, and military bases regarding the effects of aircraft operations, both ongoing and proposed, on fish and wildlife.

 5

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


 

6. Formal field research on the effects of low-altitude aircraft operations on fish and wildlife, with emphasis on waterfowl, colonial nesting birds, and threatened and endangered species should be conducted. This research should be conducted to translate observed behavioral responses to low-altitude aircraft overflights to potential adverse reproductive/population effects. Studies should be conducted that compare the wildlife use and productivity of infrequently overflown refuges to those frequently overflown by low-altitude aircraft, but otherwise similar in location and resource availability.

7. An aircraft impact prediction capability should be defined and developed, and access to the capability should be made available to all Service field installations.

 

LITERATURE CITED

 Osborn, R.G., and P. Strong. 1984. SAGIS QUICKTEXT user manual. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., National Ecology Research Center, Fort Collins, CO. 80 pp.

 6

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


 

Appendix I. Survey results by FWS region.

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

1

1

CA

1987

USFWS/ Ridgefield NWR

Private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent overflights cause flushing of waterfowl, especially snow geese. The 2,000 ft above ground level minimum altitude for refuges is frequently violated.

2

1

CA

1987

USFWS/ Sacramento ES Office

Military/ commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ other

Cited the FWS need for an impact prediction capability for proposed low-altitude aircraft operations.

3

1

CA

1986

USFWS/ Sacramento NWR (2)

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent overflights are causing serious disturbance to Refuge waterfowl, especially geese. Helicopters are more disruptive than wing aircraft. Aircraft-induced stress is believed to be making waterfowl more susceptible to disease.

4

1

CA

1987

USFWS/ Sacramento SE Office

Military/ commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ other

Cited the FWS need for an impact prediction capability for proposed low-altitude aircraft operations.

5

1

CA

1987

USFWS/ San Luis NWR Complex

Commercial

Birds/ waterfowl

Numerous agricultural spray plant operations near the Refuge Complex are flushing waterfowl, especially geese, and are sometimes driving the animals off the Refuge. Aircraft-induced stress is believed to be making waterfowl more susceptible to disease, especially during winter.

6

1

HI

1987

USFWS/ Pacific Islands SE Area Office

Military/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ raptors/ passerines/ mammals/ bats

The Area Office initiated a formal Section 7 consultation for a proposed USAF low-altitude route in Hawaii. It is believed the route could have an adverse effect on endangered species including the Hawaiian hawk, Hawaiian goose, and Hawaiian hoary bat, as well as several species of passerine forest birds.

7

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

7

1

NV

1987

USFWS/ Anaho Island NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ colonial nesting

Infrequent low-altitude aircraft operations are flushing pelicans.

8

1

NV

1987

USFWS/ Desert NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates

A possible impact to desert bighorn sheep is suspected due to a declining population and extensive and intensive aircraft operations.

9

1

NV

1987

USFWS/ Fallon NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ other

Frequent low-altitude aircraft operations are constantly disturbing (flushing) waterfowl, shorebirds, and other Refuge birds.

10

1

NV

1987

USFWS/ Lahontan NFH

Military/ small propeller

Fish

An experiment done in cooperation with the U.S. Air Force showed that a mild sonic boom had no effect on fish eggs.

11

1

NV

1987

USFWS/ Stillwater NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ other

Frequent low-altitude aircraft operations are constantly flushing waterfowl, shorebirds, and other Refuge birds.

12

1

OR

1987

USFWS/ Hart Mountain NWR

Military/ small jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates

Antelope are exhibiting panic running behavior as the result of low-altitude jet fighter aircraft.

13

1

OR

1987

USFWS/ Malheur NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ waterfowl

Malheur NWR is now on the fringe of a new Military Operations Area and it is feared that low-altitude aircraft operations may displace Refuge wildlife.

14

1

OR

1987

USFWS/ Sheldon NWR

Military/ small jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates

Antelope are exhibiting panic running behavior as a result of overpasses by low-altitude jet fighter aircraft.

8

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

 

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

15

1

WA

1987

USFWS/ Conboy Lake NWR

Military/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Virtually all Refuge ducks, geese, an swans will take flight at the sound of approaching helicopters and remain airborne until the aircraft can no longer be heard. A formal written complaint has been made to the Military.

16

1

WA

1987

USFWS/ Washington Islands NWR

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ raptors/ seabirds/ mammals/ marine mammals

Frequent overflights are causing flushing of birds and stampeding of marine mammals. Identifiable aircraft numbers were turned over to law enforcement with no results.

17

1

WA

1987

USFWS/ Willapa NWR

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent overflights, even as high as 3,000-4,000 ft above ground level cause brant to panic flush and leave the area for hours, sometimes missing the next low-tide feeding opportunity.

18

2

AZ

1987

USFWS/ Cabeza Prieta NWR

Military/ small jet

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ upland game

Reactions to intense sonic booms vary from alert and startle in bighorn sheep, jumping and running in the endangered Sonoran pronghorn and frequent flushing by birds (including Gambel's quail, mourning doves, and white-winged doves}. Most wildlife of the Refuge appear to have habituated to the repetitive sights and sounds of low-altitude aircraft flights that have taken place in the area over the past 40 years. The Refuge is concerned about intense aircraft operations over lambing grounds of the Sonoran pronghorn. The effect of flights on population sizes and altered behavior of Refuge wildlife should be investigated.

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

 

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

19

2

AZ

1987

USFWS/ Phoenix ES Office

Private/ small propeller

Birds/ raptors

Overflights by small propeller aircraft and helicopters had no adverse effect on breeding bald eagles in a 4-year study.

20

2

AZ

1987

USFWS/ Willow Beach NFH

Military/ commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ fish

Aircraft noise and sonic booms are having no effect on fish at the hatchery. It is suspected that aircraft are having an adverse effect on desert bighorn sheep, especially at calving time.

21

2

NM

1987

USFWS/ Bosque del Apache NWR

Private/ small propeller

Birds/ waterfowl/ waterbirds

Infrequent overflights are creating "scare" behavior in waterfowl, sandhill cranes, and whooping cranes.

22

2

OK

1987

USFWS/ Wichita NWR

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/waterfowl

Waterfowl will flush and remain airborne for varying lengths of time when low-altititude aircraft are over the Refuge.

23

2

OK

1987

USFWS/ Wichita Mountains NWR (2)

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ waterfowl

Refuge animals are being startled by aircraft and are exhibiting alert behavior. Waterfowl will flush and remain airborne for varying lengths of time when low-altitude aircraft are in the vicinity. Buffalo, longhorn cattle, deer, and elk have apparently habituated to the aircraft. It was stated that the most serious impact is on the people visiting the Refuge whose experiences are damaged by frequent overflights.

24

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Anahuac NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

10

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

25

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Aransas NWR (6)

Commercial/ private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterbirds/ waterfowl/ raptors/ colonial nesting/ mammals/ ungulates

It is believed that whooping cranes have habituated to low-altitude light aircraft overflights during the last 30 years. Sandhill cranes will flush at the approach of light aircraft and have apparently not habituated. Whooping cranes are flushing at the approach of low-altitude helicopters and remaining away from the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient. A response threshold has been determined to be 500 ft minimum above ground level but the threshold is frequently violated by aircraft. Sandhill cranes, egrets, herons, raptors, other Refuge birds, and deer are also exhibiting flight/fright behavior at the approach of helicopters. Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

26

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Attwater's Prairie Chicken NWR

Military/ commercial/ private/small propeller/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ upland game

A study on the effects of low-altitude aircraft on Attwater's prairie chickens showed no adverse impact.

27

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Brazoria NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

11

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

28

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Corpus Christi ES field Office

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ colonial nesting

Low-altitude overflights flush breeding birds (particularly brown pelicans) and can cause panic reactions that result in lost eggs and young. Repeated flushing can cause abandonment of the rookery. Private aircraft over the rookery has been a considerable management problem because ownership of the planes cannot easily be identified. The military have been cooperative when contacted about flights disturbing rookeries.

29

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Laguna Atascosa NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

30

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ McFadden NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

31

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ San Bernard NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights by commercial helicopters involved in oil and gas activities are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

32

2

TX

1987

USFWS/ Texas Point NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

The high frequency of low-altitude helicopters are causing severe impacts on waterfowl. The Refuge is virtually unused by waterfowl, particularly snow geese.

 12

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

33

3

IL

1987

USFWS/ Mark Twain NWR

Commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ large jet

Birds/ waterfowl/ raptors/ upland game

Geese on banding sites "spook" at merely hearing a small plane in the distance. Geese seem to raise their heads before a person can hear the noise. Red-tailed hawks, American kestrels, prairie chickens, and resident giant Canada geese near commercial airports appear to readily adjust to airport noise.

34

3

IN

1987

USFWS/ Bloomington ES Office

Military/ helicopter

Birds/colonial nesting

The Field Office commented on a proposed Air National Guard operation that would involve helicopters flying in close proximity to great blue heron rookeries. The Office stated that they lacked information on which to base their recommendations.

35

3

MI

1987

USFWS/ East Lansing ES Field Office

Military/ small jet

Birds/ raptors

In conjunction with a review of proposed military flights in the area, the East Lansing Office is in the process of reviewing bald eagle productivity data from a current jet flight path and comparing the data to State records for all of Michigan.

13

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

36

3

OH

1987

USFWS/ Ottawa NWR

Commercial/ private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Fixed-wing planes flying less than 2,000 ft above ground level over the Refuge several times a year have caused waterfowl and geese to flush. After a straight line flight of a plane, the birds usually settle back to resting and feeding within 5 to 10 minutes. Repeated passes drive birds off the area for hours. Birds are more likely to leave the area completely when disturbed by helicopters; they appear to be more sensitive to the chopping sound from a much greater distance than the sound of a fixed-wing aircraft.

37

4

AL

1987

USFWS/ Wheeler NWR

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude aircraft overflights are causing waterfowl to leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

38

4

AR

1987

USFWS/ Holla Bend NWR

Private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Various species of waterfowl, particularly geese, are flushing and leaving the Refuge in response to low-altitude aircraft overflights and do not return until the noise level returns to ambient.

39

4

AR

1987

USFWS/ Wapanocca NWR

Private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Various species of waterfowl, particularly geese, are flushing and leaving the Refuge in response to low-altitude aircraft overflights and do not return until the noise level returns to ambient.

40

4

FL

1987

USFWS/ Jacksonville SE Field Office

Military/ small jet

Birds/ colonial nesting

A study of wading bird colonies in Florida indicated that low-altitude overflights by military subsonic fighter jets had little or no adverse effects on reproductive success.

14

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

41

4

FL

1987

USFWS/ Key West NWR

Commercial/ small propeller

Birds/ colonial nesting

It is believed that the only known United States colony of magnificent frigatebirds is suffering a population decline due to frequent low-altitude overflights by tour planes.

42

4

FL

1987

USFWS/ Loxahatchee NWR

Commercial/ private/ small propeller/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds/ other

Frequent overflights by low-altitude aircraft (some less than 100 ft above ground level) are causing numerous species of birds to flush and leave the area while the aircraft are present. The Refuge has complained to the FAA without results.

43

4

GA

1987

USFWS/ Okefenokee NWR

Military/ large jet

Birds/ waterfowl

It is suspected that a proposed Air Force bombing range to be located immediately south of Banks Lake NWR will have an adverse effect on Refuge waterfowl.

44

4

LA

1987

USFWS/ Catahoula NWR

Military/ small jet

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude military fighter jet overflights are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the area while the planes are in the vicinity.

45

4

LA

1987

USFWS/ D'Arbonne NWR

Private/small propeller

Birds/ waterfowl

Low-altitude aircraft are causing startle and flushing behavior in Refuge waterfowl.

46

4

NC

1987

USFWS/ Asheville SE Field Office

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ cavity nesting/ raptors

The Endangered Species Field Office was conducting Section 7 consultations for red-cockaded woodpeckers, eagles, and peregrine falcons in response to proposed low-altitude military aircraft overflights. They requested and received information (data base printout) on the effects of low-altitude aircraft on fish and wildlife.

15

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


 Appendix I. (Continued)

 

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

47

4

NC

1987

USFWS/ Mackay Island NWR

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

48

4

NC

1987

USFWS/ Mattamuskeet NWR

Military/ large jet

Birds/ waterfowl/ shorebirds

Waterfowl and shorebirds are exhibiting startle and flushing behavior when low-altitude military bomber aircraft are in the vicinity.

49

4

NC

1987

USFWS/ Pee Dee NWR

Military/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

50

5

VA

1987

USFWS/ Back Bay NWR

Military/ small jet/large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Frequent low-altitude overflights are causing waterfowl to flush and leave the Refuge until the noise level returns to ambient.

51

5

DE

1987

USFWS/ Bombay Hook NWR (2)

Military/ commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/large jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ waterfowl/ upland game/ raptors/ fish/ shorebirds

Bombay Hook NWR is near Dover Air Force Base and receives heavy traffic by fighters, transports, helicopters, and other aircraft. Most commercial traffic is well above the Refuge (more than 10,000 ft). Sonic booms from military jets cause slight reactions (e.g., calling, alert) in pheasants and turkeys, some flushing of small birds, and startle and jumping reactions in fish. Helicopters appear to have a more pronounced impact on waterfowl and big game than repetitious plane overflights. Snow geese will invariable take flight well before a helicopter is visible or audible to a person. Raptors and game birds seem to watch aircraft much more than other terrestrial wildlife.

16

 Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

 

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

52

5

NJ

1987

USFWS/ Edwin B. Forsythe NWR

Commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Low level helicopters associated with the casino industry in Atlantic City, New Jersey, are extremely effective at hazing snow geese and brant. The birds' response to helicopters is much greater than their response to planes. The birds' response begins when the helicopter is over a mile away and the birds do not settle down until several minutes after the helicopter has cleared the area. The Refuge is a primary wintering area for brant and a stopover for snow geese, and is under the most direct route to the large metropolitan areas in northern New Jersey.

53

5

VT

1987

USFWS/ Missisquoi NWR

Private/ small propeller

Birds/ waterfowl

Migratory birds such as waterfowl are disturbed by low flying planes that in some instances may be a deliberate attempt to rally birds from unhunted areas toward hunters. The several miles of unpopulated beach and dunes also attract pilots that like to "barnstorm" areas, which has resulted in crash landings and human fatalities.

54

6

CO

1987

USFWS/ Grand Junction SE Field Office

Commercial/ private/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ raptors

The Endangered Species Field Office is involved in a Section 7 consultation for the FAA in regard to the proposed new Denver airport. If built as proposed, the new airport will result in frequent overflights (within 500 ft) of a wintering bald eagle communal roost.

17

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

55

6

MT

1987

USFWS/ Helena SE Field Office

Military/ small jet

Birds/ raptors

The Endangered Species Office is sometimes called upon to do formal or informal consultation for endangered species in response to proposed low-altitude flying operations. They cited their lack of information on the effects of low-altitude aircraft on fish and wildlife. Of particular concern was information on eagles.

56

6

MT

1987

USFWS/ Lee Metcalf NWR

Private/ small propeller

Birds/ raptors

It is believed that osprey in frequently overflown areas habituate to low-altitude aircraft. However, nesting osprey in seldom overflown areas do not appear to habituate and exhibit flight/fright behavior.

57

6

ND

1987

USFWS/ Lostwood NWR

Military/ small jet/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Low-altitude military aircraft are causing waterfowl to leave the Refuge. Waterfowl do not return to the Refuge until the aircraft leave the area.

58

6

NE

1987

USFWS/ Crescent Lake NWR

Private/ small propeller/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ upland game

It is believed that most low-altitude small aircraft have little effect on Refuge wildlife. Low-intensity sonic booms are causing fright/flight behavior in deer and pheasants.

59

6

SD

1987

USFWS/ South Dakota ES Field Office

Commercial/ private/ small propeller

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ waterfowl/ other

Low-altitude aircraft are eliciting fright/flight reactions in deer, pronghorns, waterfowl, and other migratory bi rds. In some instances, animals will react almost as soon as the aircraft is discerned.

18

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Continued)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

60

7

AK

1987

USFWS/ Anchorage ES Field Office

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Mammals/ ungulates/ birds/ seabirds

It is believed that low-altitude military aircraft are having an adverse effect on caribou, bighorn sheep, and cliff nesting birds. The Field Office is frequently called upon to comment on proposed low-altitude military aircraft operations but has no knowledge with which to adequately do so.

61

7

AK

1987

USFWS/ Arctic NWR

Commercial/ helicopter

Birds/ waterfowl

Helicopter disturbance associated with oil development has caused flushing/fright behavior in tundra swans and snow geese. Tundra swans have abandoned nests because of the disturbance.

62

7

AK

1987

USFWS/ Izembek NWR

Military/ commercial

Birds/ waterfowl

It is believed that low-altitude aircraft are having an adverse effect on waterfowl, particularly Pacific black brant.

63

7

AK

1987

USFWS/ Selawik NWR

Military/ commercial/ small propeller/ small jet

Birds/ waterfowl/ seabirds

A Corps of Engineers permit to construct an airstrip on St. Matthew Island was denied because of aircraft noise impact to adjacent seabird nesting cliffs. U.S. Air Force flight training near Lake Louise was objected to because of impact to calving caribou. Seabirds nesting 50 miles east of Nome had habituated to the frequent low overflights of commuter aircraft.

64

8

AL

1987

USFWS/ Southeastern Fish Cultural Laboratory

Commercial/ small jet

Fish

Intense,"focused" sonic booms resulted in the death of striped bass due to the fish jumping out of their tanks or dying of seizures in the water.

19

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


Appendix I. (Concluded)

Item #

Region

ST

Year

Agency/ Location

Aircraft

Animal

Issue

65

8

CA

1987

FWS/ Condor Research Center

Military/ commercial/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ raptors

It is believed that aircraft noise and sonic booms to some degree helped lead to the demise of the California Condor.

66

8

HI

1987

USFWS/ Mauna Loa Research Station

Military/ small jet/ large jet

Birds/ other

Low-altitude military overflights are believed to be causing the endangered palila bird to underutilize a sizable portion of its critical habitat. A research study has been initiated.

67

8

MO

1987

USFWS/ National Fishery Research Center

N/A

Fish

A study showed that mild simulated sonic boom had no effect on the survivability of salmonid fish eggs.

68

8

MO

1987

USFWS/ Northern Prairie WRC

Military/ private/ small propeller/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ colonial nesting

It is believed that low-altitude aircraft may be having an adverse effect on the reproduction and population of white pelicans at Chase Lake NWR in North Dakota.

69

8

TX

1987

USFWS/ Patuxent WRC: Gulf Coast Field Station

Military/ small jet/ large jet/ helicopter

Birds/ upland game

A study at Ellington Air Force Base, Texas, revealed low-altitude aircraft had no adverse effects on Attwater's prairie chicken.

20

Top of Page
Return to NPC Library 
Return to NPC Home Page


 

 

 As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration.


NPC Menu Bar NPC Home Page Support NPC Ask NPC Search the NPC Home Page NPC QuietNet NPC Resources NPC Hearing Loss and Occupational Noise Library NPC Noise News NPC Law Library NPC Library